This data package was submitted to a staging environment for testing purposes only. Use of these data for anything other than testing is strongly discouraged.

Data Package Summary    View Full Metadata

  • A Comparison of Recreational and Survey-Grade Side-Scan Sonar Systems in Mapping Reservoir Fish Habitat in 3 Southwest Ohio Reservoirs
  • Booth, Michael T; Assistant Professor - Research; University of Cincinnati
    Fletcher, Taher; Graduate Research Assistant; University of Cincinnati
    Pritt, Jeremy; Fisheries Biologist; Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Wildlife, Inland Fisheries Research Unit
  • 2024-08-23
  • Booth, M.T., T. Fletcher, and J. Pritt. 2024. A Comparison of Recreational and Survey-Grade Side-Scan Sonar Systems in Mapping Reservoir Fish Habitat in 3 Southwest Ohio Reservoirs ver 1. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/DOI_PLACE_HOLDER (Accessed 2024-12-27).
  • Littoral zone aquatic habitat is thought to play an important driver of aquatic organism population dynamics, but historically has been difficult to obtain at the whole waterbody scale because it is costly and time-consuming to collect with traditional aquatic habitat sampling methods. Here we used side-scan sonar to quantification of habitat features over large areas using two levels of equipment: recreational (consumer-grade) and professional (survey-grade). Our goal was to compare performance of the different side-scan sonars by analyzing their ability to map shoreline habitat features (wood, vegetation, and substrate) in three southwest Ohio reservoirs that contain the range of habitat features of interest to fisheries biologists.

    We used a low-cost Lowrance Active Imaging 3-in-1 system (≈$2,000 USD) recreational sonar and an EdgeTech 6205 system (≈$150,000 USD) survey-grade sonar to collect imagery along the shoreline of three reservoirs in Ohio. Using imagery from each system, We manually delineated patches of submerged woody debris, standing timber, aquatic vegetation, and benthic substrate in GIS. We also compared the size of uniquely identifiable submerged wood from paired imagery to understand potential biases between the systems.

  • N: 39.59      S: 39.17      E: -83.42      W: -84.8
  • edi.1757.1  (Uploaded 2024-08-23)  
  • This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.
  • DOI PLACE HOLDER
  • Analyze this data package using:           

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo