This data package was submitted to a staging environment for testing purposes only. Use of these data for anything other than testing is strongly discouraged.

Data Package Summary    View Full Metadata

  • Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: Data for Stream bryophytes promote cryptic productivity, 2018-2021
  • Thellman, Audrey N; Duke University
    Wooster, Tammy; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
    Malcom, Heather M; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
    Rosi, Emma J; Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
    Bernhardt, Emily S; Duke University
  • 2024-09-19
  • Thellman, A.N., T. Wooster, H.M. Malcom, E.J. Rosi, and E.S. Bernhardt. 2024. Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest: Data for Stream bryophytes promote cryptic productivity, 2018-2021 ver 1. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/DOI_PLACE_HOLDER (Accessed 2024-12-27).
  • This is the data and code associated with "Stream bryophytes promote 'cryptic' productivity in highly oligotrophic headwaters. Recent observations document increased abundance of algae and bryophytes in headwater streams of Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF). It is possible that this 'greening up' of HBEF streams may be due to climate change with rising temperatures, altered terrestrial phenology, and shifting hydrologic regimes induced. Alternatively, stream 'greening' could be due to the slow recovery of stream chemistry from decades of acid rain, which have led to rising stream water pH, declining concentrations of toxic Al3+ and extremely low solute concentrations (Likens and Buso, 2012; Rosi-Marshall, Bernhardt, et al., 2016). Three years of weekly algal measurements on contrasting substrates, more than fifteen nutrient enrichment experiments, and detailed surveys of bryophyte cover over time reveal important new insights about the interactions between these two groups of autotrophs. We predicted that light availability, hydrologic disturbance and nutrient limitation were all important determinants of algal biomass in streams. To evaluate the relative strength and hierarchy of these limiting factors, we used nutrient diffusing substrates to investigate the role of nutrients for algae and compared algal accrual rate on artificial rock vs. moss substrates in stream channels vs. constructed weir ponds to assess the role of hydrologic disturbance and scour. Our surveys and experiments spanned across seasons and local light regimes. Algal biomass was substantially higher in protected weir ponds than in stream channels, and in both habitats, algal biomass was substantially higher on artificial moss substrates than on tiles. Taken together, these results suggest that moss can provide physical protection from flood scour. Algal biomass instream on both substrate types was higher in high light seasons (pre-leaf out) and well-lit habitats indicating strong light limitation. Results from a series of fifteen nutrient diffusing substrate experiments over the course of three years provided little evidence of nutrient limitation instream (observed in 3 of 10 experiments). The most striking finding of our investigation is the previously unsuspected role of stream bryophytes in providing critical refugia for algae in these steep, heavily shaded and oligotrophic headwaters. Shifts in stream productivity over time are likely to be closely tied to changes in bryophyte cover. These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.
  • N: 43.959      S: 43.914      E: -71.7022      W: -71.8062
  • knb-lter-hbr.383.1  (Uploaded 2024-09-19)  
  • This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.
  • DOI PLACE HOLDER
  • Analyze this data package using:           

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo