Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Water chemistry time series for Beaverdam Reservoir, Carvins Cove Reservoir, Falling Creek Reservoir, Gatewood Reservoir, and Spring Hollow Reservoir in southwestern Virginia, USA 2013-2023

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:edi.1025.15
Title:Water chemistry time series for Beaverdam Reservoir, Carvins Cove Reservoir, Falling Creek Reservoir, Gatewood Reservoir, and Spring Hollow Reservoir in southwestern Virginia, USA 2013-2023
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

Depth profiles of dissolved organic and inorganic carbon and total and dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus were sampled from 2013-2023 in five drinking water reservoirs in southwestern Virginia, USA. The five drinking water reservoirs are: Beaverdam Reservoir (Vinton, Virginia), Carvins Cove Reservoir (Roanoke, Virginia), Falling Creek Reservoir (Vinton, Virginia), Gatewood Reservoir (Pulaski, Virginia), and Spring Hollow Reservoir (Salem, Virginia). Beaverdam, Carvins Cove, Falling Creek, and Spring Hollow Reservoirs are owned and operated by the Western Virginia Water Authority as primary or secondary drinking water sources for Roanoke, Virginia, and Gatewood Reservoir is a drinking water source for the town of Pulaski, Virginia. The dataset consists of depth profiles of water chemistry samples measured at the deepest site of each reservoir adjacent to the dam. Additional water chemistry samples were collected at a gauged weir on Falling Creek Reservoir's primary inflow tributary, as well as surface samples at multiple upstream and inflow sites in Falling Creek Reservoir 2014-2023 and Beaverdam Reservoir in 2019 and 2020. One upstream site at Beaverdam Reservoir was sampled at depth in 2022. Inflow sites at Carvins Cove Reservoir were sampled from 2020-2023. The water column samples were collected approximately fortnightly from March-April, weekly from May-October, and monthly from November-February at Falling Creek Reservoir and Beaverdam Reservoir, approximately fortnightly from May-August in most years at Carvins Cove Reservoir, and approximately fortnightly from 2014-2016 in Gatewood and Spring Hollow Reservoirs, though sampling frequency and duration varied among reservoirs and years.

Publication Date:2024-04-12
For more information:
Visit: DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period
Begin:
2013-04-04
End:
2023-12-04

People and Organizations
Contact:Carey, Cayelan C. (Virginia Tech) [  email ]
Creator:Carey, Cayelan C. (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Howard, Dexter W. (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Hoffman, Kathryn K. (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Wander, Heather L. (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Breef-Pilz, Adrienne (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Niederlehner, B. R. (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Haynie, George (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Keverline, Ryan (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Kricheldorf, Michael (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Tipper, Evelyn (Virginia Tech)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
Chemistry_2013_2023_final.csv
Description:
Reservoir water chemistry dataset
Data Table Name:
reservoir_site_descriptions.csv
Description:
Description, latitude, and longitude of reservoir sampling sites
Other Name:
Chemistry_QAQC_2023_2023.R
Description:
Nutrient QAQC script for 2023 data
Other Name:
Chemistry_inspection_2013_2023.Rmd
Description:
Data compilation and visualization script
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1025/15/8cd729706327d142934758219537dbdc
Name:Chemistry_2013_2023_final.csv
Description:Reservoir water chemistry dataset
Number of Records:5415
Number of Columns:24

Table Structure
Object Name:Chemistry_2013_2023_final.csv
Size:499340 bytes
Authentication:204a0b4871d60b5dd6da38fd38bc9255 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Reservoir  
Site  
DateTime  
Depth_m  
Rep  
TN_ugL  
TP_ugL  
NH4_ugL  
NO3NO2_ugL  
SRP_ugL  
DOC_mgL  
DIC_mgL  
DC_mgL  
DN_mgL  
Flag_DateTime  
Flag_TN_ugL  
Flag_TP_ugL  
Flag_NH4_ugL  
Flag_NO3NO2_ugL  
Flag_SRP_ugL  
Flag_DOC_mgL  
Flag_DIC_mgL  
Flag_DC_mgL  
Flag_DN_mgL  
Definition:Three-letter code corresponding to sampled reservoirSampling site at each reservoirDate and time of sampling. All data were collected in the eastern time zone of the U.S.A., with daylight savings time observedWater depth where the sample was collected or sensor reading was measuredField replicates collected at the same site, date, and depthTotal nitrogen concentrationTotal phosphorus concentrationAmmonium concentrationNitrate-nitrite concentrationSoluble reactive phosphorus concentrationDissolved organic carbon concentrationDissolved inorganic carbon concentrationDissolved carbon concentrationDissolved nitrogen concentrationData flag for DateTimeData flag for total nitrogen (TN); measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit numberData flag for total phosphorus (TP); measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit numberData flag for ammonium (NH4); measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit numberData flag for nitrate nitrite (NO3NO2); measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit numberData flag for soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP); measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit numberData flag for dissolved organic carbon (DOC); measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit numberData flag for dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC); measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit numberData flag for dissolved carbon (DC); measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit numberData flag for dissolved nitrogen (DN); measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit number
Storage Type:string  
float  
date  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
Measurement Type:nominalratiodateTimeratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratiorationominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominal
Measurement Values Domain:
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeBVR
DefinitionBeaverdam Reservoir
Source
Code Definition
CodeFCR
DefinitionFalling Creek Reservoir
Source
Code Definition
CodeCCR
DefinitionCarvins Cove Reservoir
Source
Code Definition
CodeSHR
DefinitionSpring Hollow Reservoir
Source
Code Definition
CodeGWR
DefinitionGatewood Reservoir
Source
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max501 
FormatYYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss
Precision
Unitmeter
Typereal
Min0.1 
Max31 
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max
UnitmicrogramsPerLiter
Typereal
Min
Max4757.1 
UnitmicrogramsPerLiter
Typereal
Min
Max329 
UnitmicrogramsPerLiter
Typewhole
Min
Max3960 
UnitmicrogramsPerLiter
Typewhole
Min
Max1150 
UnitmicrogramsPerLiter
Typewhole
Min
Max71 
UnitmilligramsPerLiter
Typereal
Min
Max18.3 
UnitmilligramsPerLiter
Typereal
Min0.1 
Max15.1 
UnitmilligramsPerLiter
Typereal
Min1.9 
Max17.9 
UnitmilligramsPerLiter
Typereal
Min
Max4.866 
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = Time recorded
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Time not recorded and set to 12:00
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = no flag
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Sample not taken
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2 = instrument malfunction
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3 = Sample below detection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4 = negative value set to zero
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5 = demonic intrusion
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 = non-standard method
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definition9 = suspect sample
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = no flag
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Sample not taken
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2 = instrument malfunction
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3 = Sample below detection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4 = negative value set to zero
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5 = demonic intrusion
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 = non-standard method
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definition9 = suspect sample
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = no flag
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Sample not taken
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2 = instrument malfunction
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3 = Sample below detection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4 = negative value set to zero
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5 = demonic intrusion
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 = non-standard method
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definition9 = suspect sample
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = no flag
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Sample not taken
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2 = instrument malfunction
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3 = Sample below detection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4 = negative value set to zero
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5 = demonic intrusion
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 = non-standard method
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definition9 = suspect sample
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = no flag
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Sample not taken
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2 = instrument malfunction
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3 = Sample below detection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4 = negative value set to zero
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5 = demonic intrusion
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 = non-standard method
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definition9 = suspect sample
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = no flag
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Sample not taken
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2 = instrument malfunction
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3 = Sample below detection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4 = negative value set to zero
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5 = demonic intrusion
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 = non-standard method
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged
Source
Code Definition
Code8
Definition8 = sample run using NPOC method due to high IC values
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definition9 = suspect sample
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = no flag
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Sample not taken
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2 = instrument malfunction
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3 = Sample below detection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4 = negative value set to zero
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5 = demonic intrusion
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 = non-standard method
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definition9 = suspect sample
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = no flag
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Sample not taken
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2 = instrument malfunction
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3 = Sample below detection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4 = negative value set to zero
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5 = demonic intrusion
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 = non-standard method
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definition9 = suspect sample
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 = no flag
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 = Sample not taken
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2 = instrument malfunction
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3 = Sample below detection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4 = negative value set to zero
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5 = demonic intrusion
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 = non-standard method
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged
Source
Code Definition
Code8
Definition8 = sample run using NPOC method due to high IC values
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definition9 = suspect sample
Source
Missing Value Code:
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
Accuracy Report:                                                
Accuracy Assessment:                                                
Coverage:                                                
Methods:                                                

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1025/15/827ba6e64c468dd35740db707de8873e
Name:reservoir_site_descriptions.csv
Description:Description, latitude, and longitude of reservoir sampling sites
Number of Records:38
Number of Columns:5

Table Structure
Object Name:reservoir_site_descriptions.csv
Size:5925 bytes
Authentication:79c4f459ed1592a5a1eff41357819ddc Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Reservoir  
Site  
Site_description  
Latitude  
Longitude  
Definition:Three-letter code corresponding to sampled reservoirSampling site at each reservoirDescription of where the reservoir site is locatedLatitude of the reservoir siteLongitude of the reservoir site
Storage Type:string  
float  
string  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:nominalrationominalratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeBVR
DefinitionBeaverdam Reservoir
Source
Code Definition
CodeFCR
DefinitionFalling Creek Reservoir
Source
Code Definition
CodeCCR
DefinitionCarvins Cove Reservoir
Source
Code Definition
CodeSHR
DefinitionSpring Hollow Reservoir
Source
Code Definition
CodeGWR
DefinitionGatewood Reservoir
Source
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max501 
DefinitionDescription of where the reservoir site is located
Unitdegree
Typereal
Min37.04435281 
Max37.4169 
Unitdegree
Typereal
Min-80.86329915 
Max-79.814012 
Missing Value Code:
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
CodeNA
Explvalue is missing
Accuracy Report:          
Accuracy Assessment:          
Coverage:          
Methods:          

Non-Categorized Data Resource

Name:Chemistry_QAQC_2023_2023.R
Entity Type:unknown
Description:Nutrient QAQC script for 2023 data
Physical Structure Description:
Object Name:Chemistry_QAQC_2023_2023.R
Size:24185 bytes
Authentication:520a726504005f370a0f55766bd417a4 Calculated By MD5
Externally Defined Format:
Format Name:text/plain
Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1025/15/e83763017aca1390846a26cf39bf8658

Non-Categorized Data Resource

Name:Chemistry_inspection_2013_2023.Rmd
Entity Type:unknown
Description:Data compilation and visualization script
Physical Structure Description:
Object Name:Chemistry_inspection_2013_2023.Rmd
Size:28389 bytes
Authentication:1bb699c6bbde201e4f841cd76d54352d Calculated By MD5
Externally Defined Format:
Format Name:text/x-markdown
Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1025/15/4b331013ee8218aa284a6e18cbf39d8f

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data (\"Data User\" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available \"as is.\" The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
carey lab controlled vocabularyCarey Lab, Virginia Reservoirs LTREB, Virginia Reservoirs, LTREB, FCR, BVR, CCR, SHR, GWR, Virginia Tech, Western Virginia Water Authority, Falling Creek Reservoir, Beaverdam Reservoir, Carvins Cove Reservoir, Gatewood Reservoir, Spring Hollow Reservoir, Stream Team
cuahsi controlled vocabularyReservoir, Lake
lter controlled vocabularyLakes, stream, streams, nitrate, soluble reactive phosphorus, phosphate, dissolved organic carbon, dissolved inorganic carbon, ammonium, total nitrogen, total dissolved nitrogen, total phosphorus, chemistry, water chemistry

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

We monitored water chemistry at five freshwater reservoirs and their tributaries from 2013 - 2023 at varying frequencies. The five drinking water reservoirs are: Beaverdam Reservoir (Vinton, Virginia), Carvins Cove Reservoir (Roanoke, Virginia), Falling Creek Reservoir (Vinton, Virginia), Gatewood Reservoir (Pulaski, Virginia), and Spring Hollow Reservoir (Salem, Virginia). Beaverdam, Carvins Cove, Falling Creek, and Spring Hollow Reservoirs are owned and operated by the Western Virginia Water Authority as primary or secondary drinking water sources for Roanoke, Virginia, and Gatewood Reservoir is a drinking water source for the town of Pulaski, Virginia. The dataset consists of depth profiles of water chemistry samples measured at the deepest site of each reservoir adjacent to the dam. Additional water chemistry samples were collected at a gauged weir on Falling Creek Reservoir's primary inflow tributary, as well as surface samples at multiple upstream and inflow sites in Falling Creek Reservoir 2014-2023 and Beaverdam Reservoir in 2019 and 2020. One upstream site at BVR was sampled at depth in 2022. Inflow sites at Carvins Cove Reservoir were sampled from 2020 - 2023. The water column samples were collected approximately fortnightly from March-April, weekly from May-October, and monthly from November-February at Falling Creek Reservoir and Beaverdam Reservoir, approximately fortnightly from May-August in most years at Carvins Cove Reservoir, and approximately fortnightly from 2014-2016 in Gatewood and Spring Hollow Reservoirs, though sampling frequency and duration varied among reservoirs and years. Water chemistry variables measured include: Total nitrogen and phosphorus, nitrate, ammonium, soluble reactive phosphorus, dissolved carbon, dissolved organic carbon, dissolved inorganic carbon, and total dissolved nitrogen.

In the methods, we describe collection methods, chemical analysis including equipment, QAQC methods, and additional references. We note that DIC and DC data may be suspect at certain times of year, see methods for more information regarding these variables.

SAMPLE COLLECTION AND EQUIPMENT

Most sampling occurred between the hours of 9:00 and 15:00 eastern standard time with daylight savings observed; however, some sampling occurred outside of these hours, including some overnight sampling. For more information about nighttime sampling, see Doubek et. al. (2018). Starting in 2018 to present, exact sampling times were included in the DateTime column starting in 2018 and are indicated in the DateTime column with a Flag_DateTime value of 0. Prior to 2018, if exact times were not recorded during sample collection, time was set to 12:00 and Flag_DateTime was set to 1.

Total nitrogen (TN) and total phosphorus (TP) unfiltered water samples were collected at specified depths for each reservoir using a 4L Van Dorn water sampler (Wildco, Yulee, Florida, USA). Samples were stored in acid-washed 125 mL polypropylene bottles and frozen within 12 hours. Total nutrient samples were generally analyzed within one year of collection date.

Soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP), nitrate (NO3), ammonium (NH4), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), and total dissolved nitrogen (DN) water samples were collected at specified depths for each reservoir using a Van Dorn water sampler and were filtered with a 0.7 um glass fiber filter (Sterlitech GF/F) before being stored in acid-washed 125 mL polypropylene bottles. Soluble/dissolved nutrient and carbon samples were generally analyzed within six months of collection date.

CHEMICAL ANALYSES AND EQUIPMENT

TN and TP samples were digested with alkaline persulfate (Patton and Kryskalla 2003) and then analyzed colorimetrically using flow injection analysis (APHA 2012). TN was analyzed using the cadmium reduction method (APHA 2012) and TP was analyzed using the ascorbic acid method (Murphy and Riley 1962) on a Lachat Instruments XYZ Autosampler ASX 520 Series and QuikChem Series 8500 (Lachat ASX 520 Series, Lachat Instruments, Loveland, Colorado, USA).

SRP, NO3, and NH4 samples were analyzed colorimetrically using flow injection analysis (APHA 2012). SRP was analyzed using the ascorbic acid method (Murphy and Riley 1962), NO3 was analyzed using the cadmium reduction method, where nitrate is reduced to nitrite (APHA 2012), and NH4 was analyzed using the Berthelot Reaction method (Solorzano 1969, APHA 2012) with a common modification as to the source of the hypochlorite ion, as described by Zhang et al. (1997), on a Lachat Instruments XYZ Autosampler ASX 520 Series and QuikChem Series 8500 (Lachat ASX 520 Series, Lachat Instruments, Loveland, Colorado, USA).

DOC was analyzed using the persulfate catalytic method (Brenton and Arnett 1993) on a TOCA 1010 from OI Analytical from 2013-2016 (OI Analytical 1010 Total Organic Carbon Analyzer with 1051 autosampler, College Station, TX USA) and on a Vario TOC Cube from Elementar from 2016-2023 (vario TOC cube, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany). Carbon in samples is oxidized to carbon dioxide (CO2) either by reaction with acid or by catalyzed combustion at 850 degrees C. The resulting carbon dioxide is detected by nondispersive infrared (NDIR) spectrometry. This method allowed for the measurement of total dissolved carbon, dissolved organic carbon, and dissolved inorganic carbon. A modified version of this method was used to measure dissolved organic carbon through the measurement of non-purgeable organic carbon (NPOC) in streams that had high inorganic carbon (IC) values. Organic carbon was still measured following the method above but the sample was first acidified and purged with air zero gas to remove inorganic carbon fractions. Samples measured with this method were flagged with an 8 in the Flag_DOC column.

We note that DIC and DC samples may be suspect from hypolimnetic samples due to rapid changes in hydrostatic pressure occurring during sample collection and storage that allows for changes in carbonate equilibrium. We have flagged all samples that were collected between April 1st and November 15th at depths less than or equal to 5m at FCR, BVR, and CCR (DIC samples were not collected at GWR or SHR). These samples were flagged with a value of 9 (see DATA FLAGS section for more information on interpreting flag columns). The depth of 5m was chosen as this depth and below in all reservoirs is often representative of the metalimnion or hypolimnion in each reservoir during stratification. If data users are interest in using this data and want a more precise classification stratification, we point users to our data products that contain both high-frequency and weekly monitoring of water temperature which could be used to calculate thermal stratification metrics (Carey et al. 2024a, 2024b, 2023a, 2023b, 2023c).

DN samples were combusted using the Vario TOC Cube from Elemantar at 850 degrees C. Total bound nitrogen in the combustion product is converted to nitrogen monoxide (NO) by oxidative pyrolysis and then reacts with an electrolyte in the electrochemical cell, producing a measurable current to calculate total dissolved nitrogen (organic and inorganic together).

For more details on instrument transitions and analytical chemistry methods performed during the study period, see Supporting Information Text 2 in Carey et al. (2022).

METHOD DETECTION LIMITS

Starting in 2020, we changed our Method Detection Limit (MDL) calculations and adopted those which are described in the USEPA second revision (USEPA 2020). The new analytical MDL calculations rely on data obtained from independent digestions over multiple runs, rather than that from a single day's run, to more accurately capture instrument performance and variability throughout the year.

QAQC SCRIPTS

Two scripts are used to QAQC and compile published data. 'QAQC_chemistry_2015_2023.R' is used to QAQC samples collected in 2023 that were analyzed between summer 2023 and winter 2024. This script applies data flags for MDLs and sets negative values to zero. 'Chemistry_inspection_2013_2023.Rmd' is used to combine 2023 data with the previous years' publication, review all data via visual inspection, and apply any additional QAQC needed for previous years' data.

DATA FLAGS

Flags for date time values were: 0 = exact time, 1 = no time recorded and set to noon

Flags for all chemistry values were the following with the exception of flag 8, which was only applied to DOC values: 1 = sample not taken, 2 = instrument malfunction, 3 = sample below detection, 4 = negative value set to zero, 5 = demonic intrusion, 6 = non-standard method, 7 = sample run multiple times and values averaged, 8 = sample run using NPOC method due to high IC values, 9 = suspect sample

We note that measurements with multiple flags are coded as a multiple-digit number (e.g., a flag of '43' indicates there was 4 = negative value set to zero and 3 = sample below detection). No delimiter was added to separate flag codes in those columns. For data with a '74' flag, data were set to 0 before averaging to get the final sample value.

PLEASE NOTE

When pulling the water chemistry data file via EDI's API in R, we recommend using the function "read.csv" instead of "read_csv". The function "read_csv" identifies the columns as "logical" instead of "double" due to >100 NA's at the beginning of the dataset. This is avoided when using the function "read.csv".

ADDITIONAL NOTES

Multiple whole-ecosystem experiments have been conducted at Falling Creek Reservoir, including intermittent operation of hypolimnetic oxygenation (HOx) and pulsed epilimnetic mixing (EM) engineering systems. We encourage you to contact the lead author of the data package for more information.

REFERENCES

APHA. 2012. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 22nd edn. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation.

Brenton R, Arnett T. 1993. Method of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory - Determination of dissolved organic carbon by UV-promoted persulfate oxidation and infrared spectrometry. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey.

Carey, C.C., A. Breef-Pilz, V. Daneshmand, A.D. Delany, and R.Q. Thomas. 2024a. Time series of high-frequency sensor data measuring water temperature, dissolved oxygen, pressure, conductivity, specific conductance, total dissolved solids, chlorophyll a, phycocyanin, fluorescent dissolved organic matter, and turbidity at discrete depths in Falling Creek Reservoir, Virginia, USA in 2018-2023 ver 8. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/7541e8d297850be7c613d116156735a9 (Accessed 2024-04-12).

Carey, C.C., A. Breef-Pilz, D.W. Howard, and A.D. Delany. 2024b. Time series of high-frequency sensor data measuring water temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, specific conductance, total dissolved solids, chlorophyll a, phycocyanin, and fluorescent dissolved organic matter at discrete depths in Carvins Cove Reservoir, Virginia, USA in 2020-2023 ver 2. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/5995542a893c73583a65f511463410cf (Accessed 2024-04-12).

Carey, C.C., A. Breef-Pilz, B.J. Bookout, R.P. McClure, and J.H. Wynne. 2023a. Time series of high-frequency sensor data measuring water temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, specific conductance, total dissolved solids, chlorophyll a, phycocyanin, fluorescent dissolved organic matter, and turbidity at discrete depths in Beaverdam Reservoir, Virginia, USA in 2016-2022 ver 3. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/4182de376fde52e15d493fdd9f26d0c7 (Accessed 2024-04-12).

Carey, C.C., A.S. Lewis, and A. Breef-Pilz. 2023b. Time series of high-frequency profiles of depth, temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, specific conductance, chlorophyll a, turbidity, pH, oxidation-reduction potential, photosynthetic active radiation, and descent rate for Beaverdam Reservoir, Carvins Cove Reservoir, Falling Creek Reservoir, Gatewood Reservoir, and Spring Hollow Reservoir in southwestern Virginia, USA 2013-2022 ver 13. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/5170b52f7514f54d834130db0efc5565 (Accessed 2024-04-12).

Carey, C.C., A. Breef-Pilz, H.L. Wander, B. Geisler, and G. Haynie. 2023c. Secchi depth data and discrete depth profiles of water temperature, dissolved oxygen, conductivity, specific conductance, photosynthetic active radiation, redox potential, and pH for Beaverdam Reservoir, Carvins Cove Reservoir, Falling Creek Reservoir, Gatewood Reservoir, and Spring Hollow Reservoir in southwestern Virginia, USA 2013-2022 ver 11. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/eb17510d09e66ef79d7d54a18ca91d61 (Accessed 2024-04-12).

Carey, C. C., Hanson, P. C., Thomas, R. Q., Gerling, A. B., Hounshell, A. G., Lewis, A. S. L., Lofton, M. E., McClure, R. P., Wander, H. L., Woelmer, W. M., Niederlehner, B. R., & Schreiber, M. E. (2022). Anoxia decreases the magnitude of the carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus sink in freshwaters. Global Change Biology, 28, 4861–4881. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16228

Patton CJ, Kryskalla JR. 2003. Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory--Evaluation of Alkaline Persulfate Digestion as an Alternative to Kjeldahl Digestion for Determination of Total and Dissolved Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Water. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey.

Revesz KM, Doctor DH. 2014. Automated determination of the stable carbon isotopic composition (d13C) of total dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) and total nonpurgeable dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in aqueous samples: RSIL lab codes 1851 and 1852: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 10, chap. C20, 38 p., http:// dx.doi.org/10.3133/tm10C20.

Solorzano, L. (1969) Determination of Ammonia in Natural Waters by the Phenolhypochlorite Method. Limnology and Oceanography, 14, 799-801.

USEPA. 2004. RSKSOP-175 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Sample Preparation and Calculations for Dissolved Gas Analysis in Water Samples Using a GC Headspace Equilibration Technique, Revision No.2 http://www.epa.gov/region1/info/testmethods/pdfs/RSKsop175v2.pdf Retrieved 20APR2015.

USEPA, E. 2020. Definition and procedure for the determination of the method detection limit, revision 2. Washington DC, USA: EPA; 2016.

Zhang, J.Z., Orter, P., Fisher, Ch. J. and Moore, L.D. 1997. Determination of ammonia in estuarine and coastal waters by gas segmented flow colorimetric analysis. Methods for determination of chemical substances in marine and estuarine environmental matrices. 2nd ed. EPA/7664-41-7.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@edirepository.org
Web Address:
https://edirepository.org
Id:https://ror.org/0330j0z60
Creators:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Individual: Dexter W. Howard
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
dwh1998@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6118-2149
Individual: Kathryn K. Hoffman
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
kkhoffman@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2063-8269
Individual: Heather L. Wander
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
hwander@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3762-6045
Individual: Adrienne Breef-Pilz
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
abreefpilz@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6759-0063
Individual: B. R. Niederlehner
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
bniederl@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6933-336X
Individual: George Haynie
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
georgeh0919@vt.edu
Individual: Ryan Keverline
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
rkeverline01@vt.edu
Individual: Michael Kricheldorf
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
mkricheldorf@vt.edu
Individual: Evelyn Tipper
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
etipper@vt.edu
Contacts:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2013-04-04
End:
2023-12-04
Geographic Region:
Description:Beaverdam Reservoir is located in Vinton, Virginia, USA
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  37.322865Southern:  37.311961
Western:  -79.824834Eastern:  -79.813848
Geographic Region:
Description:Carvins Cove Reservoir is located in Roanoke, Virginia, USA
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  37.409127Southern:  37.365345
Western:  -79.978642Eastern:  -79.944052
Geographic Region:
Description:Falling Creek Reservoir is located in Vinton, Virginia, USA
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  37.309589Southern:  37.30266
Western:  -79.839249Eastern:  -79.836009
Geographic Region:
Description:Gatewood Reservoir is located in Pulaski, Virginia, USA
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  37.054358Southern:  37.03819
Western:  -80.89188Eastern:  -80.858492
Geographic Region:
Description:Spring Hollow Reservoir is located in Salem, Virginia, USA
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  37.231092Southern:  37.217594
Western:  -80.179076Eastern:  -80.170407

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:No project title to report
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: Western Virginia Water Authority
Related Project:
Title:Collaborative Research: Consequences of changing oxygen availability for carbon cycling in freshwater ecosystems
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation 1753639
Related Project:
Title:Collaborative Research: URoL:ASC: Applying rules of life to forecast emergent behavior of phytoplankton and advance water quality management
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation 2318861
Related Project:
Title:LTREB: Integrating real-time open data pipelines and forecasting to quantify ecosystem predictability at day to decadal scales
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation 2327030
Related Project:
Title:Collaborative Research: CIBR: Cyberinfrastructure Enabling End-to-End Workflows for Aquatic Ecosystem Forecasting
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation 1933016
Related Project:
Title:Collaborative Research: CIBR: Cyberinfrastructure Enabling End-to-End Workflows for Aquatic Ecosystem Forecasting
Personnel:
Individual: Renato J. Figueiredo
Organization:University of Florida
Email Address:
renato@ece.ufl.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9841-6060
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation 1933102

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:ongoing
Frequency:

Additional Info

Additional Information:
 

Author contribution statement: CCC developed and led the reservoir monitoring program 2013-present. DWH co-led data publication and QAQC from 2021-2023. KKH co-led data publication and QAQC in 2023. HLW was the point person for running water chemistry analyses and QAQC from 2019-2022 and assisted with data publication in 2023. ABP led the field crew and contributed substantially to sampling from 2021-2023. BRN oversaw all sample analysis in 2020-2023, as well as developed analytical chemistry methods and QAQC procedures and oversaw analytical chemistry instrumentation and training of all co-authors throughout 2013-2023. GH, RK, MK, and ET assisted with field work and data digitization in 2023.

Acknowledgments and historical contributions:

This data package has been iteratively updated over time and builds on the many historical contributions of co-authors listed in previous revisions. We thank the Western Virginia Water Authority for providing access to these sites and the Reservoir Group for contributing to fieldwork. We also thank Mary Lofton for helpful reviews on this data product.

Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n      '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n         '
        |     |___element 'emlEditor'
        |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___element 'app'
        |     |     |     |___text 'EMLassemblyline'
        |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___element 'release'
        |     |     |     |___text '3.5.5'
        |     |     |___text '\n         '
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |___text '\n   '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo