Data Package Metadata View Summary

Interlaboratory testing of CuSO4 toxicity in the “Standardized Aquatic Microcosm” protocol consisting of multiple phytoplankton and animals in a chemically defined medium.

General Information

Data Package:

Local Identifier:

edi.1083.1

Title:

Interlaboratory testing of CuSO4 toxicity in the “Standardized Aquatic Microcosm” protocol consisting of multiple phytoplankton and animals in a chemically defined medium.

Alternate Identifier:

DOI PLACE HOLDER

Abstract:

Four different laboratories conducted a total of ten experiments of the “Standardized Aquatic Microcosm” to test the reproducibility of results to control, low, medium, and high concentrations of CuSO4. In nine experiments, treatments consisted of six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++. One experiment, ME74, used 0, 127, 255, 509 ppb. The purpose was to test a chemically defined medium (thus negating differences due to local water supplies) and the same 10 species of phytoplankton and 5 animals, including Daphnia. Microbes were undefined. The protocol included the weekly re-introduction of small numbers of each species to allow potential recovery from toxicity. Control microcosms had a “spring algal bloom” terminated by zooplankton grazing and multiple competitive interactions. The copper inhibited some phytoplankton more than others and killed many grazers, especially Daphnia.

The data set presented several interesting statistical properties that would yield new insights.

(a) The results were very similar, but the timing varied— the higher the concentration of copper, the longer the inhibition and mortality of organisms, so those at 500 ppb recovered earlier, the 1000 ppb recovered later, and at 2000 ppb most never recovered. But if compared on each sampling day, e.g., 10, 14, … to 64, results appear highly variable.
(b) In at least one experiment, the toxicity of copper was challenging to demonstrate statistically because high variability in the timing of recovery of the intermediate concentration increased pooled variances.
(c) The elimination of highly-sensitive dominant organisms allowed less-sensitive organisms to increase in abundance. Within natural environments, the observation that some species increase in the presence of toxic substances has been used to discredit toxicity testing without considering the relative sensitivities of competing or predatory species.
(d) The competitive interactions among organisms, e.g., cyanobacteria and green algae, may provide new insights.

More data are available than fit the format, and those interested should contact taub@uw.edu.

Related papers

Conquest, L. L., and F. B. Taub. 1989. Repeatability and reproducibility of the standardized aquatic microcosm: Statistical properties. Pages 159-177 in A. S. 1027, editor. Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: 12th Volume. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

Harrass, M. C., and F. B. Taub. 1985. Comparison of laboratory microcosms and field responses to copper. Pages 57-74 in T. P. Boyle, editor. Validation and Predictability of Laboratory Methods for Assessing the Fate and Effects of Contaminants in Aquatic Ecosystems, ASTM STP 865. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

Kindig, A. C., F. B. Taub, and L. L. Conquest. 1984. Interlaboratory repeatability of experimental effects in laboratory microcosms.in 8th ASTM Symposium on Aquatic Toxicology, Fort Mitchell, Kentucky.

Meador, J. P. 1988. The Chemical and Biological Factors Associated with Ecosystem Recovery from Copper Stress as Exemplified by Microcosms. University of Washington https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/chemical-biological-factors-associated-with/docview/303592933/se-2?accountid=14784

Meador, J. P., T. H. Sibley, G. L. Swartzman, and F. B. Taub. 1998. Resistance to copper toxicity by the freshwater algal species Oocystis pusilla and its ability to alter free ion copper. Aquatic Toxicology 44:69-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-445X(98)00067-8

Meador, J. P., F. B. Taub, and T. H. Sibley. 1993. Copper dynamics and the mechanism of ecosystem level recovery in a standardized aquatic microcosm. Ecological Applications 3:139-155. https://doi.org/1941797

Rose, K. A., G. L. Swartzman, A. C. Kindig, and F. B. Taub. 1988. Stepwise iterative calibration of a multispecies phytoplankton-zooplankton simulation model using laboratory data. Ecological Modelling 42:1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(88)90089-0

Swartzman, G. L., F. B. Taub, J. Meador, C. Huang, and A. C. Kindig. 1990. Modeling the effect of algal biomass on multispecies aquatic microcosms response to copper toxicity. Aquatic Toxicology 17:93-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(90)90025-K

Taub, F. 1989. Standardized aquatic microcosm development and testing. Pages 47-94 in A. Boudou and F. Ribeyre, editors. Aquatic Ecotoxicology. CRC Press, Inc. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781351069854-3/standardized-aquatic-microcosm-development-testing-taub

Taub, F. 1983. Direct and indirect effects of test chemicals displayed by synthetic, aquatic microcosms. Presented at the Society of Enivronmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC), 2nd Annual Meeting, Arlington, Virginia.

Taub, F. B. 1985. Toward interlaboratory (round-robin) testing of a standardized aquatic microcosm. Pages 165-186 in J. Cairns Jr, editor. Multispecies Toxicity Testing. Pergamon Press, U.K.

Taub, F. B. 1993. Standardizing an Aquatic Microcosm Test. Pages 159-188 in A. Soares and P. Calow, editors. Progress in Standardization of Aquatic Toxicity Tests. Pergamon Press.

Taub, F. B. 1997a. Are ecological studies relevant to pesticide registration decisions? Ecological Applications 7:1083-1085. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2641194

Taub, F. B. 1997b. Unique information contributed by multispecies systems: Examples from the standardized aquatic microcosm. Ecological Applications 7:1103-1110. https://doi.org/2641198

Taub, F. B., A. C. Kindig, and L. L. Conquest. 1986. Preliminary results of interlaboratory testing of a standardized aquatic microcosm. Pages 93-120 in J. Cairns Jr, editor. Community Toxicity Testing. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia.

Taub, F. B., A. C. Kindig, and L. L. Conquest. 1988a. Interlaboratory testing of a standardized aquatic microcosm. Pages 384-405 in W. J. Adams, G. A. Chapman, and W. G. Landis, editors. Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia.

Taub, F. B., A. C. Kindig, L. L. Conquest, and J. P. Meador. 1988b. STANDARDIZED AQUATIC MICROCOSMS - ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES TO TOXICANTS. Aquatic Toxicology 11:422-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(88)90124-5

Taub, F. B., A. C. Kindig, L. L. Conquest, and J. P. Meador. 1989. Results of interlaboratory testing of the standardized aquatic microcosm protocol. Pages 368-394 in G. W. Suter II and M. A. Lewis, editors. Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment, ASTM STP 1007. American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia.

Taub, F. B., A. C. Kindig, J. P. Meador, and G. L. Swartzman. 1991. Effects of â seasonal successionâ nand grazing on copper toxicity in aquatic microcosms. SIL Proceedings, 1922-2010 24:2205-2214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03680770.1989.11899926

Taub, F. B., P. L. Read, A. C. Kindig, M. C. Harrass, H. J. Hartmann, L. L. Conquest, F. J. Hardy, and P. T. Munro. 1983. Demonstration of the ecological effects of streptomycin and malathion on synthetic aquatic microcosms. Pages 5-25 in W. E. Bishop, R. D. Cardwell, and B. B. Heidolph, editors. Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: Sixth Symposium. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA.

Publication Date:

2022-02-17

For more information:
Visit:	DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period

Begin:

1983-12-02

End:

1986-07-18

People and Organizations
Contact:	Taub, Frieda B (School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences - University of Washington, Professor Emeritus) [ email ]
Contact:	Matheson, John (US FDA retired) [ email ]
Contact:	Meador, James (NOAA Fisheries, Aquatic Toxicologist) [ email ]
Creator:	Taub, Frieda B (University of Washington, Professor Emeritus)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:	Experiment Specific Metadata
Description:	Experiment specific data such as location, personal, start and end data, and lab notes.
Data Table Name:	ME64
Description:	All data for experiment 64 from the University of Washington in Seattle with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.
Data Table Name:	ME65
Description:	All data for experiment 65 from EPA Duluth Laboratory in Minnesota with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.
Data Table Name:	ME67
Description:	All data for experiment 67 from EPA Duluth Laboratory in Minnesota with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.
Data Table Name:	ME69
Description:	All data for experiment 69 from the University of Washington in Seattle with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.
Data Table Name:	ME72
Description:	All data for experiment 72 from the University of Washington in Seattle with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.
Data Table Name:	ME74
Description:	All data for experiment 74 from the Aberdeen-Army lab in Maryland with six replicates of 0, 127, 255, and 509 ppb Cu++.
Data Table Name:	ME79
Description:	All data for experiment 79 from the Marine Bioassay Laboratories, Inc. in California with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.
Data Table Name:	ME82
Description:	All data for experiment 82 from the University of Washington in Seattle with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.
Data Table Name:	ME87
Description:	All data for experiment 87 from the Army Aberdeen lab in Maryland with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++. This experiment does not contain nutrient data.
Data Table Name:	ME89
Description:	All data for experiment 89 from the University of Washington in Seattle with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.

Detailed Metadata

Data Entities

Data Table


Data:	https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1083/1/a035923ae7674314e001853634ae30a3
Name:	Experiment Specific Metadata
Description:	Experiment specific data such as location, personal, start and end data, and lab notes.
Number of Records:	10
Number of Columns:	7

Table Structure

Object Name:

Metadata by Experiment.csv

Size:

12702 byte

Authentication:

3a5b25f65a75fbf959fbaf5b1ee52afa Calculated By MD5

Text Format:

Number of Header Lines:

Record Delimiter:

\r\n

Orientation:

column

Simple Delimited:

Field Delimiter:	,
Quote Character:	"

Table Column Descriptions

Experiment Number

Treatment

Start Date

End Date

Personnel

Location

Lab Notes

Column Name:

Experiment Number

Treatment

Start Date

End Date

Personnel

Location

Lab Notes

Definition:

Assigned experiment number as labeled.

Description of treatments used on each experiment and if the experiment was replaced with another.

Day zero of the experiment.

Day 63 of the experiment.

A list of personnel who worked on a given experiment.

Location of the lab were the experiment was done.

Notes taken during the experiment.

Storage Type:

float

string

dateTime

string

Measurement Type:

nominal

dateTime

nominal

Measurement Values Domain:

Definition

Assigned experiment number as labeled.

Definition

Description of treatments used on each experiment and if the experiment was replaced with another.

Format	YYYY-MM-DD
Precision

Format	YYYY-MM-DD
Precision

Definition

A list of personnel who worked on a given experiment.

Definition

Location of the lab were the experiment was done.

Definition

Notes taken during the experiment.

Missing Value Code:

Accuracy Report:

Accuracy Assessment:

Coverage:

Methods:

Data Table


Data:	https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1083/1/deaea71fee9891a3dace23ca37013d90
Name:	ME64
Description:	All data for experiment 64 from the University of Washington in Seattle with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.
Number of Records:	456
Number of Columns:	56

Table Structure

Object Name:

ME64.csv

Size:

188794 byte

Authentication:

8b442f4e5b52f9235eb4622383b9a2f5 Calculated By MD5

Text Format:

Number of Header Lines:

Record Delimiter:

\r\n

Orientation:

column

Simple Delimited:

Field Delimiter:	,
Quote Character:	"

Table Column Descriptions

Day

Treatment

Microcosm Number

Selenastrum Density

Chlamydomonas Density

Scenedesmus Density

Ankistrodesmus Density

Chlorella Density

Nitzschia Kutzigiana Density

Anabaena Cell Density

Lyngbya Cell Desntiy

Stigeoclonium Density

Ulothrix Density

Unidentified Green Alga Density

Available Algae

Algal Biovolume

Daphnia Fecundity Ratio

Shannon-Weaver Weighted Algal Diversity

Shannon-Weaver Algal Species Diversity

Small Daphnia Concentration

Medium Daphnia Concentration

Large Daphnia Concentration

Daphnia Concentration

Small to Total Daphnia Concentration Ratio

Daphnia Biomass

Small Amphipods Concentration

Large Amphipods Concentration

Amphipods Concentration

Ostracods Concentration

Ephippia Presence

Rotifer Concentration

Small Rotifer Concentration

Hypotrichs Concentration

Miscellaneous Protozoan Concentration

Vorticella Cocentration

Nemertines Concentration

First Dissolved Oxygen Measurement

Second Dissolved Oxygen Measurement

Third Dissolved Oxygen Measurement

Dissolved Oxygen Gain

Dissolved Oxygen Loss

Dissolved Oxygen Change Over 24 Hours

Net Photosynthesis-Respiration Ratio

In vivo Fluorescence

pH Immediately After Lights On

pH at 1130-1200 Hours

Phosphate Concentration

Silicate Concentration

Nitrate Concentration

Nitrite Concentration

Ammonia Concentration

Nitrate to Phosphate ratio

(Nitrate + Nitrite) to Phosphate Ratio

Total Nitrogen to Phosphate Ratio

Column Name:

DAY

TRT

MIC

SELAN

CHLAMY

SCENED

ANKIS

CHLOR

D216

ANABENA

LYNGBYA

STIG

ULOTH

UNKALG1

AVALGAE

ABIOVOL

DFECUND

DVRSFD

DVRSALG

SDAPHNIA

MDAPHNIA

LDAPHNIA

DAPHNIA

PSDAPHN

MDSIZE

DBIOMAS

SAMPH

LAMPH

AMPH

OSTRACOD

EPHIPPIA

PHILODIN

ROTIFER

HYPO

MISCEL

VORT

NEMER

TURBAB

DO1

DO2

DO3

DDOAM

DDOPM

DELDO

RATIOPR

FLUOR

PH1

PH2

PO4

SIO4

NO3

NO2

NH3

RATIO1

RATIO2

RATIO3

Definition:

Day since experiment started the sample was taken

The treatment number assigned to microcosm the data was collected from

Microcosm number (identifier)

Selenastrum abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Chlamydomonas abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Scenedesmus abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Ankistrodesmus abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Chlorella abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Nitzschia Kutzigiana abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Anabaena abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Lyngbya abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Stigeoclonium abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Ulothrix abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

Unidentified green alga abundance, counted in a 1mm x 1mm x 0.1mm hemocytometer.

A measurement of the algae available for Daphnia to feed on based on the biomass of algae and their feeding availability.

The measurement of the total algal biovolume of the algae in each microcosm determined by algae count and cell volume.

Daphnia Fecundity Ratio. Calculated by SDAPHNIA/LDAPHNIA.

An estimate of the diversity of algal cells that are available to the Daphnia for feeding

Diversity measurements of all algal species from the Shannon-Weaver equation.

Small Daphnia(~0.7mm) count per 100mL

Medium Daphnia(0.7mm-1.8mm) count per 100mL

Large Daphnia(>1.8mm) count per 100mL

Daphnia count per 100mL

The ratio of small to total daphnia

Mean Daphnia Length

Daphnia Biomass per 100ML

Small Amphipods(<4mm) per 100 mL

Large Amphipods(>4mm) per 100 mL

Amphipods per 100 mL

Ostracods per 100mL

Ephippia presence in Daphnia

Philodina acuticornis (rotifer) per mL

Small Rotifers per mL

Hypotrichs (protozoa) counts per mL

Miscellaneous Protozoan per mL

Vorticella(Protozoa) counts per mL

Nemertines per mL

Absorbance at 440nM in Spectrophotometer Model 20, which provides a measure of turbidity.

First measurement of dissolved oxygen taken in the a.m. before the lights are turned on.

Second measurement of dissolved oxygen taken in the p.m. before the lights are turned off.

Third measurement of dissolved oxygen taken in the a.m. before the lights are turned on.

The amount of gained dissolved oxygen during the light period. This is calculated by subtracting DO1 from DO2.

The amount of lost dissolved oxygen during the dark period. This is calculated by subtracting DO3 from DO2.

The change in dissolved oxygen over 24 hours. This is calculated by subtracting DO1 from DO3.

The ratio of photosynthesis(gain of oxygen) and respiration(loss of oxygen). The equation is as follows: (DO2-DO1)/(DO2-DO3) = (DDOAM)/(DDOPM)

In vivo Fluorescence measured in 1-cm diameter tube. Measured using Turner Model #111 fluorometer.

pH taken immediately after lights are turned on at 930 hours.

pH taken between 1130-1200 hours.

Phosphate(PO4) concentration

Silicate(SiO4) concentration

Nitrate NO3 Concentration

Nitrite(NO2) Concentration

Ammonia(NH3) Concentration

Ratio of Nitrate to Phosphate. Calculated by NO3/PO4.

Ratio of Nitrate and Nitrite to Phosphate. Calculated by (NO3 + NO2)/PO4.

Total Nitrogen to Phosphate Ratio. Calculated by (NO3+NO2+NH3)/PO4.

Storage Type:

float

string

float

string

float

string

float

string

float

Measurement Type:

ratio

nominal

ratio

nominal

ratio

Measurement Values Domain:

Unit	nominalDay
Type	real

Allowed Values and Definitions

Enumerated Domain

Code Definition

Code	1
Definition	Control
Source

Code Definition

Code	2
Definition	500 ppb Cu^++
Source

Code Definition

Code	3
Definition	1000 ppb Cu^++
Source

Code Definition

Code	4
Definition	2000 ppb Cu^++
Source

Definition

Microcosm number (identifier)

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberPer0.1MillimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	numberMicrometerCubedPer0.1Mililiter
Type	real

Unit	numberMicrometerCubedPer0.1MilimeterCubed
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	numberPer100Milliliters
Type	real

Unit	numberPer100Milliliters
Type	real

Unit	numberPer100Milliliters
Type	real

Unit	numberPer100Milliliters
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	millimeter
Type	real

Unit	numberPer100Milliliters
Type	real

Unit	numberPer100Milliliters
Type	real

Unit	numberPer100Milliliters
Type	real

Unit	numberPer100Milliliters
Type	real

Unit	numberPer100Milliliters
Type	real

Allowed Values and Definitions

Enumerated Domain

Code Definition

Code	-99
Definition	Data is not available
Source

Code Definition

Code	0
Definition	Ephippia is not present
Source

Code Definition

Code	1
Definition	Ephippia is present
Source

Unit	numberPerMilliliter
Type	real

Unit	numberPerMilliliter
Type	real

Unit	numberPerMilliliter
Type	real

Unit	numberPerMilliliter
Type	real

Unit	numberPerMilliliter
Type	real

Unit	numberPerMilliliter
Type	real

Unit	opticalDensity
Type	real

Unit	partsPerMillion
Type	real

Unit	partsPerMillion
Type	real

Unit	partsPerMillion
Type	real

Unit	partsPerMillion
Type	real

Unit	partsPerMillion
Type	real

Unit	partsPerMillion
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	microgramPerLiter
Type	real

Unit	microgramPerLiter
Type	real

Unit	microgramPerLiter
Type	real

Unit	microgramPerLiter
Type	real

Unit	microgramPerLiter
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Unit	dimensionless
Type	real

Missing Value Code:

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Code	-99.0000
Expl	data is not available

Accuracy Report:

Accuracy Assessment:

Coverage:

Methods:

Data Table


Data:	https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1083/1/3bfbd30603c63c2c9ed4ed9f6c1ef12f
Name:	ME65
Description:	All data for experiment 65 from EPA Duluth Laboratory in Minnesota with six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++.
Number of Records:	456
Number of Columns:	56

Table Structure

Object Name:

ME65.csv

Size:

189055 byte

Authentication:

f44e06b4835bfca680e3a9d64a452bd3 Calculated By MD5

Text Format:

Number of Header Lines:

Record Delimiter:

\r\n

Orientation:

column

Simple Delimited:

Field Delimiter:	,
Quote Character:	"