Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Habitat fragmentation mite data, South Carolina, 2018

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:edi.1549.1
Title:Habitat fragmentation mite data, South Carolina, 2018
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

These csv files contain mite abundance and richness data, fungal abundance data, and leaf characteristics used in the paper "The impact of habitat fragmentation on domatia-dwelling mites and a mite-plant-fungus tritrophic interaction" published in Landscape Ecology in 2022. The project was conducted at the Savannah River Site, near Aiken, South Carolina, United States during the summer of 2018. The goal of the project was to assess the impacts of landscape-level habitat fragmentation on communities of mites and fungi on leaf surfaces growing on Quercus nigra oak trees within landscape patches. To investigate this, we counted and morphotyped mites found on leaves taken from oaks located in habitat patches manipulated to have different edge-to-area ratios and connectivity statuses. We also manipulated mite access to domatia on oak leaves using a tar treatment, and assessed whether mite exclusion and landscape fragmentation variables influenced levels of fungal hyphae on oak leaves. We found a significant positive effect of patch edge proximity on mite abundance and richness, as well as fungal hyphae abundance, indicating that landscape-level habitat fragmentation can impact microscopic foliar communities.

Publication Date:2024-01-18
For more information:
Visit: DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period
Begin:
2018-06-27
End:
2018-08-14

People and Organizations
Contact:Graham, Carolyn D. K. (Michigan State University) [  email ]
Contact:Warneke, Christopher R (Michigan State University) [  email ]
Creator:Graham, Carolyn D. K. (Michigan State University)
Creator:Warneke, Christopher R (Michigan State University)
Creator:Weber, Marjorie G (Michigan State University)
Creator:Brudvig, Lars A (Michigan State University)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
cw_mite_data_for_release
Description:
Mite morphospecies and domatia count data from experimentally manipulated oaks collected at the SRS Corridor Project in 2018
Data Table Name:
fungal_data_for_release
Description:
Fungal abundance on leaves from experimentally manipulated oaks collected at the SRS Corridor Project in 2018
Data Table Name:
cg_mite_data_for_release
Description:
Mite morphospecies abundance and domatia count data taken from oak leaves at the SRS Corridor Project in 2018
Data Table Name:
leaf_area_data_2022
Description:
Leaf area data from pressed experimental oak leaves originally collected at the SRS Corridor Project in 2018
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1549/1/e0bd10e9614dfa4b5a87710140a9cdd3
Name:cw_mite_data_for_release
Description:Mite morphospecies and domatia count data from experimentally manipulated oaks collected at the SRS Corridor Project in 2018
Number of Records:331
Number of Columns:25

Table Structure
Object Name:cw_mite_data_for_release.csv
Size:31668 byte
Authentication:05375c816bed7df75281bbb9b701a7b1 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 date.collecteddate.processedobserversitepatchdistancetreatmentid.treeleafid.leafn.tarn.domnotesdstdllwbbbhdlmischhwhnymphp.typetot.counttot.spp
Column Name:date.collected  
date.processed  
observer  
site  
patch  
distance  
treatment  
id.tree  
leaf  
id.leaf  
n.tar  
n.dom  
notes  
dstd  
ll  
wb  
bb  
hdl  
misc  
hh  
wh  
nymph  
p.type  
tot.count  
tot.spp  
Definition:date.collected is the day the leaves were collected in the fielddate processed is the date the leaves were processed in the labresearcher who collected the data in the rowsite where the leaves were collectedhabitat patch were the leaves were collectedlocation within the habitat patch were the data was collectedwhether the oak the leaves were collected from was a treatment oak or a control oaka unique code for each experimental oak tree in the studyindividual leaf sampledan individual code for each leaf sampled in the studynumber of tar spots applied to the leafnumber of domatia on the leafnotes columnmite morphospecies dstd abundancemite morphospecies ll abundancemite morphospecies wb abundancemite morphospecies bb abundancemite morphospecies hdl abundancemiscellaneous unidentified mite abundancemite morphospecies hh abundancemite morphospecies wh abundancemite nymph abundancetype of habitat patchtotal mite count on leaftotal number of unique mite species on the leaf
Storage Type:dateTime  
dateTime  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
string  
float  
float  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:dateTimedateTimenominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalrationominalratiorationominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratiorationominalratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Definitiontext
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code10
Definitionsite 10
Source
Code Definition
Code52
Definitionsite 52
Source
Code Definition
Code53N
Definitionsite 53N
Source
Code Definition
Code53S
Definitionsite 53S
Source
Code Definition
Code54S
Definitionsite 54S
Source
Code Definition
Code57
Definitionsite 57
Source
Code Definition
Code8
Definitionsite 8
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeB
Definitionpatch B
Source
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitionpatch C
Source
Code Definition
CodeD
Definitionpatch D
Source
Code Definition
CodeE
Definitionpatch E
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitioncenter
Source
Code Definition
CodeE
Definitionedge
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitioncontrol
Source
Code Definition
CodeT
Definitiontreatment
Source
Definitiontext
Unitcount
Typeinteger
Definitiontext
Unitspots
Typeinteger
Unitdomatia
Typeinteger
Definitiontext
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typeinteger
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeconnected
Definitionpatch connected to the center A patch via a corridor
Source
Code Definition
Coderectangle
Definitionrectangular patch
Source
Code Definition
Codewing
Definitionpatch with winged corridors on either side of it
Source
Unitmites
Typeinteger
Unitspecies
Typereal
Missing Value Code:                                                  
Accuracy Report:                                                  
Accuracy Assessment:                                                  
Coverage:                                                  
Methods:                                                  

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1549/1/66c326aa5a0f5a0a830df569164c14c7
Name:fungal_data_for_release
Description:Fungal abundance on leaves from experimentally manipulated oaks collected at the SRS Corridor Project in 2018
Number of Records:331
Number of Columns:14

Table Structure
Object Name:fungal_data_for_release.csv
Size:16530 byte
Authentication:53eccd2a9edc0c75d3bfb3fde77a43c7 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 observersitepatchdistancetreatmentid.treeleafid.leafupperside.fungal.countlowerside.fungal.countp.typetotal.fungal.counttotal.mite.countn.dom
Column Name:observer  
site  
patch  
distance  
treatment  
id.tree  
leaf  
id.leaf  
upperside.fungal.count  
lowerside.fungal.count  
p.type  
total.fungal.count  
total.mite.count  
n.dom  
Definition:researcher who collected fungal abundance data on the leafexperimental site the leaves were collected fromexperimental patch the leaves were collected fromlocation of experimental oak within the patchwhether the oak had the mite exclusion treatment applied to itunique code for each experimental oak treeleaf on which fungal data was collectedunique code for each experimental leafnumber of hyphae that crossed a standard transect on the upper leaf surfacenumber of hyphae that crossed a standard transect on the lower leaf surfacehabitat patch typetotal fungal hyphae count for the leaftotal number of mites on the leafnumber of domatia on the leaf
Storage Type:string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
string  
float  
float  
string  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:nominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalrationominalratiorationominalratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
Definitiontext
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code10
Definitionsite 10
Source
Code Definition
Code52
Definitionsite 52
Source
Code Definition
Code53N
Definitionsite 53N
Source
Code Definition
Code53S
Definitionsite 53S
Source
Code Definition
Code54S
Definitionsite 54S
Source
Code Definition
Code57
Definitionsite 57
Source
Code Definition
Code8
Definitionsite 8
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeB
Definitionpatch B
Source
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitionpatch C
Source
Code Definition
CodeD
Definitionpatch D
Source
Code Definition
CodeE
Definitionpatch E
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitioncenter
Source
Code Definition
CodeE
Definitionedge
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitioncontrol
Source
Code Definition
CodeT
Definitiontreatment
Source
Definitiontext
Unitleaf
Typereal
Definitiontext
Unithyphae
Typeinteger
Unithyphae
Typeinteger
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeconnected
Definitionpatch connected to the center A patch via a corridor
Source
Code Definition
Coderectangle
Definitionrectangular patch
Source
Code Definition
Codewing
Definitionpatch with winged corridors on either side of it
Source
Unithyphae
Typeinteger
Unitmites
Typeinteger
Unitdomatia
Typeinteger
Missing Value Code:                            
Accuracy Report:                            
Accuracy Assessment:                            
Coverage:                            
Methods:                            

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1549/1/a079c4bb2efae4a492981c92784dfbde
Name:cg_mite_data_for_release
Description:Mite morphospecies abundance and domatia count data taken from oak leaves at the SRS Corridor Project in 2018
Number of Records:1100
Number of Columns:33

Table Structure
Object Name:cg_mite_data_for_release.csv
Size:116664 byte
Authentication:5dd0a8b6adc6fe881943d58936c565e8 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 date.collecteddate.processedobserversitepatchdistanceplantid.plantleafLBCLCBDSTDLLHDRHWBBBDBRLBHHDLYLBCOBPCRmiscnymphn.domNotesp.typetot.counttot.spp
Column Name:date.collected  
date.processed  
observer  
site  
patch  
distance  
plant  
id.plant  
leaf  
LB  
CL  
CB  
DSTD  
LL  
HD  
RH  
WB  
BB  
DB  
RL  
BH  
HDL  
YLB  
CO  
BP  
CR  
misc  
nymph  
n.dom  
Notes  
p.type  
tot.count  
tot.spp  
Definition:date the leaves were collected in the fielddate the leaves were processed for mites in the labresearcher who collected the dataexperimental site the leaves were collected fromexperimental patch the leaves were collected fromexperimental oak location within the patchexperimental oak treeunique code for each experimental oak treeleaf on which mite abundance data was collectedmite morphospecies LB abundancemite morphospecies CL abundancemite morphospecies CB abundancemite morphospecies DSTD abundancemite morphospecies LL abundancemite morphospecies HD abundancemite morphospecies RH abundancemite morphospecies WB abundancemite morphospecies BB abundancemite morphospecies DB abundancemite morphospecies RL abundancemite morphospecies BH abundancemite morphospecies HDL abundancemite morphospecies YLB abundancemite morphospecies CO abundancemite morphospecies BP abundancemite morphospecies CR abundancemiscellaneous unidentified mite abundancemite nymph abundancenumber of domatia on the leafnotes columnhabitat patch typetotal number of mites on the leafnumber of unique mite species on the leaf
Storage Type:dateTime  
dateTime  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
string  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:dateTimedateTimenominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratiorationominalnominalratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Definitiontext
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code10
Definitionsite 10
Source
Code Definition
Code52
Definitionsite 52
Source
Code Definition
Code53N
Definitionsite 53N
Source
Code Definition
Code53S
Definitionsite 53S
Source
Code Definition
Code54S
Definitionsite 54S
Source
Code Definition
Code57
Definitionsite 57
Source
Code Definition
Code8
Definitionsite 8
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeB
Definitionpatch B
Source
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitionpatch C
Source
Code Definition
CodeD
Definitionpatch D
Source
Code Definition
CodeE
Definitionpatch E
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitioncenter
Source
Code Definition
CodeE
Definitionedge
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1
Definitiontree 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definitiontree 2
Source
Definitiontext
Unitleaf
Typeinteger
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typeinteger
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitmites
Typereal
Unitdomatia
Typereal
Definitiontext
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeconnected
Definitionpatch connected to the center A patch via a corridor
Source
Code Definition
Coderectangle
Definitionrectangular patch
Source
Code Definition
Codewing
Definitionpatch with winged corridors on either side of it
Source
Unitmites
Typeinteger
Unitspecies
Typereal
Missing Value Code:                                                        
CodeNA
Explmissing value
       
Accuracy Report:                                                                  
Accuracy Assessment:                                                                  
Coverage:                                                                  
Methods:                                                                  

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/1549/1/e0681c45c7e31e3c33e90f5588c2f593
Name:leaf_area_data_2022
Description:Leaf area data from pressed experimental oak leaves originally collected at the SRS Corridor Project in 2018
Number of Records:280
Number of Columns:10

Table Structure
Object Name:leaf_area_data_2022.csv
Size:11577 byte
Authentication:af0fb34f88c7614747d18a0df7d0a3f3 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 date.collobserversitepatchdistanceplantidleafareanotes
Column Name:date.coll  
observer  
site  
patch  
distance  
plant  
id  
leaf  
area  
notes  
Definition:date the leaf area data was collectedresearcher who collected the dataexperimental site where the leaves were collectedexperimental patch where the leaves were collectedexperimental oak location within the patchexperimental oak numberunique code for each experimental oak treeleaf on which area data was collectedleaf area in pixelsnotes column
Storage Type:dateTime  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
string  
string  
Measurement Type:dateTimenominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalrationominalnominal
Measurement Values Domain:
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Definitiontext
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code10
Definitionsite 10
Source
Code Definition
Code52
Definitionsite 52
Source
Code Definition
Code53N
Definitionsite 53N
Source
Code Definition
Code53S
Definitionsite 53S
Source
Code Definition
Code54S
Definitionsite 54S
Source
Code Definition
Code57
Definitionsite 57
Source
Code Definition
Code8
Definitionsite 8
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitionpatch C
Source
Code Definition
CodeD
Definitionpatch D
Source
Code Definition
CodeE
Definitionpatch E
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitioncenter
Source
Code Definition
CodeE
Definitionedge
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1
Definitionoak 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definitionoak 2
Source
Definitiontext
Unitleaf
Typeinteger
Definitiontext
Definitiontext
Missing Value Code:                
Codena
Explmissing value
 
Accuracy Report:                    
Accuracy Assessment:                    
Coverage:                    
Methods:                    

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
(No thesaurus)habitat fragmentation, domatia, landscape corridor, edge effect, trophic interactions, defense-mutualism, SRS corridor project
LTER Controlled Vocabularymites

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Methods copied directly from:

Graham, C.D.K., Warneke, C.R., Weber, M. et al. The impact of habitat fragmentation on domatia-dwelling mites and a mite-plant-fungus tritrophic interaction. Landsc Ecol 37, 3029–3041 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-022-01529-2

STUDY SITE

We worked within a long-running fragmentation experiment at the Savannah River Site (SRS), a

National Environmental Research Park located near New Ellenton, South Carolina. The experiment consists of seven replicated experimental landscapes (blocks), each of which is 50 ha in size and includes five ~ 1.4 ha longleaf pine savanna patches surrounded by longleaf (Pinus palustris Mill.) and/or loblolly (Pinus taeda L.) pine plantation with limited herbaceous ground cover (Fig. 1A). Savanna patches were originally created by clearing mature pine plantation forests and managing the clearings with prescribed fire every 2–3 years to maintain open patch structure, as is typical for longleaf pine savanna system (Jose et al. 2006). Six of the

seven blocks had been burned in the winter of 2017–2018 (the winter prior to our work), with the remaining block burned during the previous winter of 2016–2017. This design results in experimental patches of open savanna habitat surrounded by a forested matrix.

The design of the experiment isolates the effects of patch shape and connectivity while holding constant the area of individual patches and the total habitat area within each block. Each block includes a 100×100 m center patch with four peripheral patches each 150 m away from the center patch (Fig. 1A). A corridor (25 m wide and 150 m long) connects the center patch and one of the peripheral patches, and is included in the area of this “connected patch”. The unconnected patches are “rectangular” or “winged,” with equal areas (~ 1.4 ha, with the extra 0.4 ha area being the wings or back of the rectangle patch). Each experimental block has at least one rectangular and one winged patch and the remaining patch in each block was randomly assigned to be either a rectangular patch or a winged patch. Effects of connectivity can be distinguished through comparisons of connected and winged patches (which differ only in their connectivity), while patch shape is distinguished through comparing winged and rectangle patches (which differ only in their edge-to-area ratio).

FOCAL PLANT SPECIES

Quercus nigra (Fagaceae) is a deciduous oak tree species native to North America. This species is widespread within the experimental landscapes and has conspicuous mite domatia which take the form of

clusters of trichomes located at the junctions of major veins on the lower leaf surface. While this is the first

study to examine the mite communities associated with the domatia of Q. nigra, studies in other species (including oaks) have demonstrated that domatia are occupied by a group of largely fungivorous, but sometimes also predacious, mites from families such as Tydeidae and Phytoseiidae, which are considered plant mutualists (O’Dowd and Willson 1997). Due to recent prescribed fire, our sampled oaks were resprouting and relatively short (40–220 cm in height).

Q1 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

To test for fragmentation effects on mite communities, we sampled mites on leaves of Q. nigra plants

from across all treatments in the field experiment. We sampled four Q. nigra individuals in the peripheral patches of each of the seven replicate blocks (Fig. 1A) in late June through early August of 2018 (n=110

oaks in 28 patches, due to one patch that lacked the requisite number of oaks). We sampled two oaks

in each of two zones within each patch (Fig. 1B): the edge (within 12.5 m of the patch edge) and the

center (the patch area greater than 37.5 m from the patch edge). Within the two zones, we located oaks

that were healthy and similar in size. After selecting trees, we haphazardly sampled 10 fully-expanded,

undamaged leaves from each oak, and immediately placed these leaves in plastic bags containing moistened paper-towels for transport on ice from the field to the laboratory. Within the plastic bags, leaves did not come in contact with each other. Within 48 h of collection, we examined the undersides of all leaves with a dissection microscope, counting the number of domatia per leaf and the total number of mites per leaf. Additionally, we sorted mites into morphospecies; representatives of which were stored in 95% ethanol and stored at −20 °C for later DNA extraction and identification. The methods for mite DNA extraction and barcoding can be found in the supplement (Appendix S1).

Q2 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

To investigate whether fragmentation effects altered plant-mite-fungus interactions, we applied a mite exclusion treatment to two pairs of Q. nigra individuals, resulting in one control and one treatment oak

at both the edge and center of the patches (n=109 oak individuals among 28 patches, due to one mortality event and one patch that lacked the requisite number of oaks). We selected focal Q. nigra individuals for this experiment using the same edge and center zones and strategy as the mite diversity survey (Fig. 1B), although different individual plants were used. We excluded mites by blocking domatia with pruning tar, a standard manipulative technique for nearly eliminating domatia-dwelling mites on plant leaves (Norton et al. 2000, 2001; Monks et al. 2007). We applied pruning tar (TreeKote Wound Dressing, Walter E. Clark & Son, Inc., Orange, CT) to all of the domatia on the underside of every leaf of two treated trees in each patch, randomly assigned to the mite-exclusion treatment. For the remaining two Q. nigra trees in each patch, we conducted a control treatment to account for the presence of pruning tar (and any potential effects of the tar itself), by applying approximately the same number of tar spots that would have been applied to the domatia, but elsewhere on the lower leaf surface, such that the domatia were still available for mite colonization and use. Before applying the tar treatment, we pruned all focal Q. nigra individuals to a consistent size. We maintained the treatment on all leaves for six weeks, following initial tar application. Any new leaves that were produced during this time were removed, in order to maintain the treatment across the whole plant. After the six-week treatment period, we haphazardly sampled three fully-expanded, undamaged leaves from each oak. We immediately placed these leaves in plastic bags containing moistened paper towels for transport on ice from the field to the laboratory. All leaves were processed within 24 h of collection. For each leaf, we examined the leaf undersides under a dissection microscope, counting all domatia and the number of mites. To quantify fungal abundance on the leaf surface, we used established fungal peel methods (Harris 2000; Monks et al. 2007). In brief, following the counting of mites and domatia, we pressed the sticky side of a 19 mm wide piece of Matte Finish tape to the lower leaf surface (Skilcraft, Alexandria, Virginia, USA). We then placed the tape

on a slide and dyed the fungal hyphae on the slide mount using a solution of 0.5% (w/v) trypan blue in lactoglycerol (1:1:1 lactic acid, glycerol and water flitered at 0.45 μm). We counted the number of times hyphal threads crossed a transect from a standardized area of tape (that being the whole width of the tape,

from one side of the slide mount to the other).

Description:

References

Harris JL (2000) Safe, low-distortion tape touch method for fungal slide mounts. J Clin Microbiol 38:4683–4684. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.38.12.4683-4684.2000

Jose S, Jokela EJ, Miller D (2006) The longleaf pine ecosystem: Ecology, silviculture, and restoration. Springer, New York City, New York

Monks A, O’Connell DM, Lee WG et al (2007) Benefits associated with the domatia mediated tritrophic mutualism in the shrub Coprosma lucida. Oikos 116:873–881. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.2007.0030-1299.15654.x

Norton AP, English-Loeb G, Belden E (2001) Host plant manipulation of natural enemies: Leaf domatia protect beneficial mites from insect predators. Oecologia 126:535–542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000556

Norton AP, English-Loeb G, Gadoury D, Seem RC (2000) Mycophagous mites and foliar pathogens: Leaf domatia mediate tritrophic interactions in grapes. Ecology 81:490–499. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000) 081[0490:MMAFPL]2.0.CO;2

O’Dowd DJ, Willson MF (1997) Leaf domatia and the distribution and abundance of foliar mites in broadleaf deciduous forest in Wisconsin. Am Midl Nat 137:337–348

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@edirepository.org
Web Address:
https://edirepository.org
Id:https://ror.org/0330j0z60
Creators:
Individual: Carolyn D. K. Graham
Organization:Michigan State University
Email Address:
cdkgraham@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-1913
Individual: Christopher R Warneke
Organization:Michigan State University
Email Address:
crwarneke@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-4273
Individual: Marjorie G Weber
Organization:Michigan State University
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8629-6284
Individual: Lars A Brudvig
Organization:Michigan State University
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-2165
Contacts:
Individual: Carolyn D. K. Graham
Organization:Michigan State University
Email Address:
cdkgraham@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-1913
Individual: Christopher R Warneke
Organization:Michigan State University
Email Address:
crwarneke@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-4273
Metadata Providers:
Individual: Carolyn D. K. Graham
Organization:Michigan State University
Email Address:
cdkgraham@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-1913
Individual: Christopher R Warneke
Organization:Michigan State University
Email Address:
crwarneke@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-4273

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2018-06-27
End:
2018-08-14
Geographic Region:
Description:Data was collected at the Savannah River Site, near Aiken, South Carolina, United States.
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  33.372281Southern:  33.185567
Western:  -81.757081Eastern:  -81.508008
Taxonomic Range:
Classification:
Rank Name:Kingdom
Rank Value:Viridiplantae
Common Name:green plants
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 33090 (Viridiplantae)
Classification:
Rank Name:Phylum
Rank Value:Streptophyta
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 35493 (Streptophyta)
Classification:
Rank Name:Subphylum
Rank Value:Streptophytina
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 131221 (Streptophytina)
Classification:
Rank Name:Class
Rank Value:Magnoliopsida
Common Name:flowering plants
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 3398 (Magnoliopsida)
Classification:
Rank Name:Order
Rank Value:Fagales
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 3502 (Fagales)
Classification:
Rank Name:Family
Rank Value:Fagaceae
Common Name:beech family
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 3503 (Fagaceae)
Classification:
Rank Name:Genus
Rank Value:Quercus
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 3511 (Quercus)
Classification:
Rank Name:Species
Rank Value:Quercus nigra
Common Name:water oak
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 262615 (Quercus nigra)
Taxonomic Range:
General Coverage:Mites were sorted into morphospecies, and vouchers of as many morphospecies as possible were identified to the family level using genetic barcoding.
Classification:
Rank Name:Kingdom
Rank Value:Metazoa
Common Name:metazoans
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 33208 (Metazoa)
Classification:
Rank Name:Phylum
Rank Value:Arthropoda
Common Name:arthropods
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6656 (Arthropoda)
Classification:
Rank Name:Subphylum
Rank Value:Chelicerata
Common Name:chelicerates
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6843 (Chelicerata)
Classification:
Rank Name:Class
Rank Value:Arachnida
Common Name:arachnids
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6854 (Arachnida)
Classification:
Rank Name:Subclass
Rank Value:Acari
Common Name:mites and ticks
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6933 (Acari)
Classification:
Rank Name:Superorder
Rank Value:Acariformes
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6946 (Acariformes)
Classification:
Rank Name:Order
Rank Value:Trombidiformes
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 83136 (Trombidiformes)
Classification:
Rank Name:Suborder
Rank Value:Prostigmata
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6947 (Prostigmata)
Classification:
Rank Name:Infraorder
Rank Value:Eleutherengona
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 83145 (Eleutherengona)
Classification:
Rank Name:Superfamily
Rank Value:Tarsonemoidea
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 133228 (Tarsonemoidea)
Classification:
Rank Name:Family
Rank Value:Tarsonemidae
Common Name:white mites
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 133229 (Tarsonemidae)
Taxonomic Range:
General Coverage:Mites were sorted into morphospecies, and vouchers of as many morphospecies as possible were identified to the family level using genetic barcoding.
Classification:
Rank Name:Kingdom
Rank Value:Metazoa
Common Name:metazoans
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 33208 (Metazoa)
Classification:
Rank Name:Phylum
Rank Value:Arthropoda
Common Name:arthropods
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6656 (Arthropoda)
Classification:
Rank Name:Subphylum
Rank Value:Chelicerata
Common Name:chelicerates
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6843 (Chelicerata)
Classification:
Rank Name:Class
Rank Value:Arachnida
Common Name:arachnids
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6854 (Arachnida)
Classification:
Rank Name:Subclass
Rank Value:Acari
Common Name:mites and ticks
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6933 (Acari)
Classification:
Rank Name:Superorder
Rank Value:Parasitiformes
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6934 (Parasitiformes)
Classification:
Rank Name:Order
Rank Value:Mesostigmata
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 34634 (Mesostigmata)
Classification:
Rank Name:Suborder
Rank Value:Monogynaspida
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 281668 (Monogynaspida)
Classification:
Rank Name:Infraorder
Rank Value:Gamasina
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 1723665 (Gamasina)
Classification:
Rank Name:Superfamily
Rank Value:Phytoseioidea
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 1253825 (Phytoseioidea)
Classification:
Rank Name:Family
Rank Value:Phytoseiidae
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 34636 (Phytoseiidae)
Taxonomic Range:
General Coverage:Mites were sorted into morphospecies, and vouchers of as many morphospecies as possible were identified to the family level using genetic barcoding.
Classification:
Rank Name:Kingdom
Rank Value:Metazoa
Common Name:metazoans
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 33208 (Metazoa)
Classification:
Rank Name:Phylum
Rank Value:Arthropoda
Common Name:arthropods
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6656 (Arthropoda)
Classification:
Rank Name:Subphylum
Rank Value:Chelicerata
Common Name:chelicerates
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6843 (Chelicerata)
Classification:
Rank Name:Class
Rank Value:Arachnida
Common Name:arachnids
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6854 (Arachnida)
Classification:
Rank Name:Subclass
Rank Value:Acari
Common Name:mites and ticks
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6933 (Acari)
Classification:
Rank Name:Superorder
Rank Value:Acariformes
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6946 (Acariformes)
Classification:
Rank Name:Order
Rank Value:Trombidiformes
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 83136 (Trombidiformes)
Classification:
Rank Name:Suborder
Rank Value:Prostigmata
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6947 (Prostigmata)
Classification:
Rank Name:Superfamily
Rank Value:Tydeoidea
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 708319 (Tydeoidea)
Classification:
Rank Name:Family
Rank Value:Tydeidae
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 708320 (Tydeidae)
Taxonomic Range:
General Coverage:Mites were sorted into morphospecies, and vouchers of as many morphospecies as possible were identified to the family level using genetic barcoding.
Classification:
Rank Name:Kingdom
Rank Value:Metazoa
Common Name:metazoans
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 33208 (Metazoa)
Classification:
Rank Name:Phylum
Rank Value:Arthropoda
Common Name:arthropods
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6656 (Arthropoda)
Classification:
Rank Name:Subphylum
Rank Value:Chelicerata
Common Name:chelicerates
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6843 (Chelicerata)
Classification:
Rank Name:Class
Rank Value:Arachnida
Common Name:arachnids
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6854 (Arachnida)
Classification:
Rank Name:Subclass
Rank Value:Acari
Common Name:mites and ticks
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6933 (Acari)
Classification:
Rank Name:Superorder
Rank Value:Acariformes
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6946 (Acariformes)
Classification:
Rank Name:Order
Rank Value:Trombidiformes
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 83136 (Trombidiformes)
Classification:
Rank Name:Suborder
Rank Value:Prostigmata
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 6947 (Prostigmata)
Classification:
Rank Name:Superfamily
Rank Value:Eupodoidea
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 94819 (Eupodoidea)
Classification:
Rank Name:Family
Rank Value:Eupodidae
Identifer:National Center for Biotechnology Information - Taxonomy (NCBI)
Info for ID: 393868 (Eupodidae)

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:The impact of habitat fragmentation on domatia‑dwelling mites and a mite‑plant‑fungus tritrophic interaction
Personnel:
Individual: Carolyn D. K. Graham
Organization:Michigan State University
Email Address:
cdkgraham@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7221-1913
Role:REU Student Researcher
Individual: Christopher R Warneke
Organization:Michigan State University
Email Address:
crwarneke@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-4273
Role:Graduate Student Researcher
Individual: Marjorie G Weber
Organization:Michigan State University
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8629-6284
Role:Principal Investigator
Individual: Lars A Brudvig
Organization:Michigan State University
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-2165
Role:Principal Investigator
Additional Award Information:
Funder:National Science Foundation
Number:1354085
Title:Collaborative Research LTREB: Understanding the strength, duration, and stability of connectivity effects on community diversity
Additional Award Information:
Funder:National Science Foundation
Number:1819026
Title:REU Supplemental Funding
Additional Award Information:
Funder:National Science Foundation
Number:1912729
Title:LTREB Renewal: Collaborative Research: Understanding the strength, duration, and stability of connectivity effects on community diversity
Additional Award Information:
Funder:National Science Foundation
Number:1913501
Title:LTREB Renewal: Collaborative Research: Understanding the strength, duration, and stability of connectivity effects on community diversity
Additional Award Information:
Funder:National Science Foundation
Number:1831164
Title:Dimensions: The causes and consequences of leaf trait evolution for hidden life on the phyllosphere: Phylogeny, function, and the genome

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:

The corresponding manuscript for this data has been published, so it is unlikely the data will be changed or added to at all moving forward.

Frequency:
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n      '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n         '
        |     |___element 'unitList'
        |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'count'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'count'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n               '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'spots'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'spots'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n               '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'domatia'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'domatia'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n               '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'mites'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'mites'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n               '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'species'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'species'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n               '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'leaf'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'leaf'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n               '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'hyphae'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'hyphae'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n               '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n            '
        |     |     |___text '\n         '
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |___text '\n   '

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n      '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n         '
        |     |___element 'emlEditor'
        |     |        \___attribute 'app' = 'ezEML'
        |     |        \___attribute 'release' = '2024.01.12'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |___text '\n   '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo