Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Field cover at the Edwin S. George Reserve, Southeastern Michigan in 1957

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:edi.367.1
Title:Field cover at the Edwin S. George Reserve, Southeastern Michigan in 1957
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

Raunkiaer's well known system of plant life-form classification shows relationships between relative importance of certain life-form classes and major world climatic zones. Recent investigations have shown that there are also differences in life-form distribution related to climatic variations within the larger "phytoclimates." Several reviews (Adamson 1939; Cain 1950; Cain & Castro 1959) have summarized our understanding of these life-form concepts.

Relationships between life-forms and microclimate, however, have not been intensively investigated. Cain (1950) suggests that "Although life-form spectra have been employed mostly for general climatic analysis, there are enough studies available to suggest that they may be even more useful for the analysis of climatic variants and microclimates." The limited data available in the literature provide enough evidence that life-form distribution varies with differences in topography and microclimate to warrant further investigation of the subject.

The possible indicator significance of variations in community life-form composition also have received little attention. Whittaker (1954) points out that "composition of vegetation in terms of life-forms and growth-forms may indicate position along local gradients." Furthermore, the fact that a plant's life-form represents, in theory, a fundamental adaptation to environment makes community life-form composition of greater potential value than community species composition for use as an indicator of site (microenvironmental) conditions.

This study was an intensive investigation of the vegetation and microclimates of north- and south- facing (henceforth referred to as north and south) slopes on the E. S. George Reserve in southeastern Michigan. The data obtained were used to demonstrate relationships between Raunkiaerian life-forms and microclimate and to illustrate the value of community life-form data as indicators of habitat conditions.

The metadata for this dataset are taken from Cooper et. al 1961 ("Relationships Between Plant Life-Forms and Microclimate", https://doi.org/10.2307/1950745). This dataset includes the life-form data but not microclimate data.

Publication Date:2021-07-12

Time Period
Begin:
1957-08-26
End:
1957-09-07

People and Organizations
Contact:Tallant, Jason (University of Michigan Biological Station) [  email ]
Creator:Cooper, Arthur (University of Michigan Department of Botany)
Associate:Tallant, Jason (University of Michigan Biological Station, Data Manager)
Associate:Pawlik, Alexandria (University of Michigan Biological Station, Data Curator)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
Field Cover Density
Description:
Density of herbs, trees, and shrubs in horizontal regions of sloped plots
Data Table Name:
Plot Summary
Description:
Plot numbers and key plot properties
Data Table Name:
Tree and Shrub DBH Measurements
Description:
DBH measurements and status for trees and shrubs in each plot
Data Table Name:
Tree and Shrub Reproduction Counts
Description:
Reproduction counts for trees and shrubs in each plot
Other Name:
R Code
Description:
R scripts for data and metadata cleaning
Other Name:
Source
Description:
Source data for R scripts
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/367/1/0a1fe3d621e65e8e1f3e78c43b806ba4
Name:Field Cover Density
Description:Density of herbs, trees, and shrubs in horizontal regions of sloped plots
Number of Records:2838
Number of Columns:5

Table Structure
Object Name:field_cover.csv
Size:114803 bytes
Authentication:7e0cfc47a21796422717deee880d742c Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Plot_ID  
Cover_Type  
Species  
Subplot_Zone  
Centimeters_Diagonal_Cover  
Definition:Identifier for the 30m x 30m plot within the Edwin S. George Reserve (1-19, excluding 5).Specifies whether the measured species is considered woody or herb.Genus and species of measured vascular plant, as determined from both summer and winter observation.Specifies which zone of the plot is being measured, where top is the top of the hill in the specified plot.Centimeters of cover comprised of the specified species in the specified subplot zone. Coverage was determined in each 100m2 subplot along the central 10m diagonal strip in the subplot, meaning each zone has a total diagonal 30m being measured. See methods for a more complete description.
Storage Type:float  
string  
string  
string  
float  
Measurement Type:rationominalnominalnominalratio
Measurement Values Domain:
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max19 
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeHERB
DefinitionRecorded plant species is an herb.
Source
Code Definition
CodeWOODY
DefinitionRecorded plant species is a tree or shrub.
Source
DefinitionGenus and species of measured vascular plant, as determined from both summer and winter observation.
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeBOTTOM
DefinitionBottom of slope. Includes subplots 1-3.
Source
Code Definition
CodeMIDDLE
DefinitionMiddle of slope. Includes subplots 4-6.
Source
Code Definition
CodeTOP
DefinitionTop of slope. Includes subplots 7-9.
Source
Unitcentimeter
Typenatural
Min
Max2189 
Missing Value Code:          
Accuracy Report:          
Accuracy Assessment:          
Coverage:          
Methods:          

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/367/1/17118d3686d6616fc28974303bc30e0d
Name:Plot Summary
Description:Plot numbers and key plot properties
Number of Records:18
Number of Columns:9

Table Structure
Object Name:plot_summary.csv
Size:1333 bytes
Authentication:51fb70eccaaf773724658a74713318f8 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Measurement_Date  
Plot_ID  
Direction_Facing  
Protected_or_Open  
Approximate_Latitude_N  
Approximate_Longitude_W  
Slope_Percent  
Topographic_Position  
Downhill_Compass_Bearing  
Definition:Date that all measurements for the specified plot were collected.Identifier for the 30m x 30m plot within the Edwin S. George Reserve (1-19, excluding 5).Cardinal direction of downhill on the plot.Presence or absence of plot protection as afforded by a facing slope within 500 ft.Approximate latitude of plot, estimated based on drawn map provided by Art Cooper.Approximate longitude of plot, estimated based on drawn map provided by Art Cooper.Slope of plot as a percent of full-vertical, i.e. 0% means horizontal and 100% means vertical.Position of plot with respect to the Edwin S. George Reserve topography.Exact quadrant bearing of downhill on plot.
Storage Type:date  
float  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
string  
string  
Measurement Type:dateTimerationominalnominalratioratiorationominalnominal
Measurement Values Domain:
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max19 
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeE
DefinitionEast
Source
Code Definition
CodeN
DefinitionNorth
Source
Code Definition
CodeS
DefinitionSouth
Source
Code Definition
CodeW
DefinitionWest
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeO
DefinitionOpen
Source
Code Definition
CodeP
DefinitionProtected
Source
Unitdegree
Typereal
Min42.4578 
Max42.4646 
Unitdegree
Typereal
Min-84.0146 
Max-83.9993 
Unitpercent
Typenatural
Min31 
Max60 
DefinitionPosition of plot with respect to the Edwin S. George Reserve topography.
DefinitionExact quadrant bearing of downhill on plot.
Missing Value Code:      
CodeNA
ExplPlot protection unknown.
CodeNA
ExplPlot location unknown.
CodeNA
ExplPlot location unknown.
CodeNA
ExplPlot slope unknown.
CodeNA
ExplPlot location unknown.
CodeNA
ExplExact compass bearing unknown.
Accuracy Report:                  
Accuracy Assessment:                  
Coverage:                  
Methods:                  

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/367/1/fa90c32812d359b851b48abe117b22c3
Name:Tree and Shrub DBH Measurements
Description:DBH measurements and status for trees and shrubs in each plot
Number of Records:1738
Number of Columns:5

Table Structure
Object Name:tree_shrub_dbh.csv
Size:51937 bytes
Authentication:c9e1cefc1a5f53a51d2e55e331ddd61d Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Plot_ID  
Species  
Subplot_ID  
DBH  
Status  
Definition:Identifier for the 30m x 30m plot within the Edwin S. George Reserve (1-19, excluding 5).Genus and species of measured tree.Specifies which subplot is being measured out of 9 possible 10m x 10m subplots. Subplots are numbered left to right, downhill to uphill.The diameter at breast height of all trees over 1 inch dbh.Specifies whether the tree was dead or alive when measured.
Storage Type:float  
string  
float  
float  
string  
Measurement Type:rationominalratiorationominal
Measurement Values Domain:
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max19 
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeAcer rubrum
DefinitionCommon name: red maple
Source
Code Definition
CodeAmelanchier arborea
DefinitionCommon name: common serviceberry
Source
Code Definition
CodeAmelanchier laevis
DefinitionCommon name: allegheny serviceberry
Source
Code Definition
CodeAmelanchier sanguinea
DefinitionCommon name: roundleaf serviceberry
Source
Code Definition
CodeCarya ovalis
DefinitionCommon name: red hickory
Source
Code Definition
CodeCarya ovata
DefinitionCommon name: shagbark hickory
Source
Code Definition
CodeCrataegus spp.
DefinitionUnknown species of the genus crataegus
Source
Code Definition
CodeFraxinus americana
DefinitionCommon name: white ash
Source
Code Definition
CodeHamamelis virginiana
DefinitionCommon name: witch hazel
Source
Code Definition
CodeJuniperus virginiana
DefinitionCommon name: red cedar, red juniper
Source
Code Definition
CodePopulus grandidentata
DefinitionCommon name: bigtooth aspen
Source
Code Definition
CodePrunus americana
DefinitionCommon name: American plum
Source
Code Definition
CodePrunus serotina
DefinitionCommon name: black cherry
Source
Code Definition
CodePrunus virginiana
DefinitionCommon name: chokecherry
Source
Code Definition
CodeQuercus alba
DefinitionCommon name: white oak
Source
Code Definition
CodeQuercus rubra
DefinitionCommon name: northern red oak
Source
Code Definition
CodeQuercus velutina
DefinitionCommon name: black oak
Source
Code Definition
CodeSassafras albidum
DefinitionCommon name: sassafras
Source
Code Definition
CodeTilia americana
DefinitionCommon name: basswood
Source
Code Definition
CodeUlmus americana
DefinitionCommon name: American elm
Source
Code Definition
CodeVaccinium spp.
DefinitionUnknown species of the genus vaccinium
Source
Code Definition
CodeVitis spp.
DefinitionUnknown species of the genus vitis
Source
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max
Unitinch
Typereal
Min0.1 
Max29 
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeA
DefinitionAlive
Source
Code Definition
CodeD
DefinitionDead
Source
Missing Value Code:      
CodeNA
ExplTree was noted but DBH was not recorded.
 
Accuracy Report:          
Accuracy Assessment:          
Coverage:          
Methods:          

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/367/1/a51a780baa9cd2857900e727adae3b19
Name:Tree and Shrub Reproduction Counts
Description:Reproduction counts for trees and shrubs in each plot
Number of Records:249
Number of Columns:4

Table Structure
Object Name:tree_shrub_reproduction.csv
Size:6514 bytes
Authentication:577e72e484434e9a46e7dc0f5de74f45 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Plot_ID  
Species  
Subplot_ID  
Reproduction_Count  
Definition:Identifier for the 30m x 30m plot within the Edwin S. George Reserve (1-19, excluding 5).Genus and species of measured vascular plant, as determined from both summer and winter observation.Specifies which subplot is being measured out of 9 possible 10m x 10m subplots. Subplots are numbered left to right, downhill to uphill.Number of saplings of the specified species observed in the subplot. All shrubs and trees below 1 inch dbh and over 4.5 ft high were recorded.
Storage Type:float  
string  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:rationominalratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max19 
DefinitionGenus and species of measured vascular plant, as determined from both summer and winter observation.
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max101 
Missing Value Code:        
Accuracy Report:        
Accuracy Assessment:        
Coverage:        
Methods:        

Non-Categorized Data Resource

Name:R Code
Entity Type:unknown
Description:R scripts for data and metadata cleaning
Physical Structure Description:
Object Name:code.zip
Size:3698 bytes
Authentication:d167799a9de3699987ef63e203fcea1b Calculated By MD5
Externally Defined Format:
Format Name:application/zip
Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/367/1/4e50f447afd6b191f9ae61b007934ee5

Non-Categorized Data Resource

Name:Source
Entity Type:unknown
Description:Source data for R scripts
Physical Structure Description:
Object Name:raw.zip
Size:446133 bytes
Authentication:10a9d009a61a7f1f236dee2dcf7d9ba2 Calculated By MD5
Externally Defined Format:
Format Name:application/zip
Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/367/1/f31bbdd1b3e85bccd652680e16935819

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
http://vocab.lternet.edu/vocab/vocab/index.phpforest ecology, community composition, vascular plants, trees, shrubs, herbs
(No thesaurus)ESGR, University of Michigan Edwin S. George Reserve

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

North- and south-facing slopes were chosen as sites for this study because of the great environmental and vegetational differences shown for such slopes in other studies (Potzger 1939, Shanks & Norris 1950, Cantlon 1953). Microenvironmental and vegetational sampling was carried out from March 17 to November 3, 1957. Data were obtained from 17 slopes, 9 north-facing and 8 south-facing. Slopes ranged from 31-60% in angle and deviated not more than 20 degrees from true north or true south. Vegetation was sampled on 16 of these slopes, but microenvironmental data were recorded for only 4 north and 4 south slopes.

Although efforts were made to minimize all variables with the exception of topographic orientation, they were not entirely successful. In addition to orientation, an important variable was the presence or absence of protection as afforded by a facing slope. Thus, 4 groups of slopes were available: protected north slopes, open north slopes, protected south slopes, and open south slopes. The following data summarize the specific topographic characteristics of the sample sites:

Protected north slopes (Stations 1, 5, 6, 10, 16). Station 1 was on the side of an esker facing into a kettle whereas Stations 5, 6, 10, and 16 were on the sides of kettles. Contours at all stations were concave.

Open north slopes (Stations 8, 11, 13, 15). Station 8 was on the side of a large kettle but, as the opposite side was over 500 ft distant, the facing slope offered no protection. Stations 11 and 15 were on the edge of an outwash fan and Station 13 was on the side of an esker. Contours at Stations 8 and 11 were concave and those at Station 13 were straight. Contours at Station 15 were slightly convex.

Protected south slopes (Stations 7, 14). Both of these stations were on the sides of kettles with concave contours.

Open south slopes (Stations 2, 3, 4, 9, 12, 17). These stations were all on the sides of eskers. Stations 2 and 12 actually faced into a large kettle but, as the opposite slope was approximately 500 ft distant, there was no real protection. Contours at Stations 2, 3, and 12 were essentially straight. At Stations 4 and 9 contours were slightly convex whereas at Station 17 contours were somewhat concave.

Although no historical data were available for the sample sites, it appeared that there had been no selective effects of grazing or lumbering on any slope or group of slopes. Thus, it was assumed that the microclimatic and vegetational differences recorded were the results of real habitat differences rather than the past cultural practices of man.

Vegetational sampling was carried out during July and August of 1957. On each of the 16 slopes sampled a plot 900 m2, consisting of three tiers of three 100 m2 plots, was laid out. Subplots with IDs 1-3 are in the bottom tier, 4-6 in the middle tier, and 7-9 in the top tier. Presence of all vascular plant species occurring in each subplot was recorded. Coverage of species in the field layer (within 4.5 feet of the ground) was determined by the line-intercept method. As plots were laid out on the horizontal and plant cover was recorded on the horizontal by means of two meter sticks arranged so that one was placed perpendicular to the horizontal and the other moved up or down along it until it was horizontal. The central 10 m of both diagonals of each of the subplots were measured with this device. Thus, 180 m of line-intercept data were available for each slope sample plot. The diameter at breast height of all trees over 1 inch d.b.h. and density of all shrubs and transgressives below 1 inch d.b.h. and over 4.5 ft high were determined in each subplot. In addition, the total canopy cover of species over 1 inch d.b.h. was determined by pacing the four 30 m across-slope boundaries of the 3 tiers of subplots. The life-form of all species encountered was determined from winter and summer field observation during a part of 1956 and all of 1957 and by consulting other life-form studies of similar areas (Ennis 1928, McDonald 1937). Voucher specimens of all species are deposited either in the Reserve herbarium or in the author's collection. Nomenclature is that of Fernald (1950). Representative leaves were chosen from the voucher specimens and their areas determined both by tracings on millimeter graph paper and by the 2/3 length times width rule of Cain et al. (1956). The entire species list, showing both lifeforms and leaf-size, may be found in Cooper (1958).

Description:
This provenance metadata does not contain entity specific information.
Data Source
Relationships between Plant Life-Forms and Microclimate in Southeastern Michigan

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@environmentaldatainitiative.org
Web Address:
https://environmentaldatainitiative.org
Creators:
Individual: Arthur Cooper
Organization:University of Michigan Department of Botany
Email Address:
awcooper1953@gmail.com
Contacts:
Individual: Jason Tallant
Organization:University of Michigan Biological Station
Email Address:
jtallant@umich.edu
Associated Parties:
Individual: Jason Tallant
Organization:University of Michigan Biological Station
Email Address:
jtallant@umich.edu
Role:Data Manager
Individual: Alexandria Pawlik
Organization:University of Michigan Biological Station
Email Address:
apawlik@umich.edu
Role:Data Curator

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
1957-08-26
End:
1957-09-07
Sampling Site: 
Description:University of Michigan Edwin S. George Reserve in Pinckney, Michigan
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -84.00Latitude (degree): 42.46

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Relationships between Plant Life-Forms and Microclimate in Southeastern Michigan
Personnel:
Individual: Arthur Cooper
Organization:University of Michigan Department of Botany
Email Address:
awcooper1953@gmail.com
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: Rackham School of Graduate Studies
Related Project:
Title:Relationships between Plant Life-Forms and Microclimate in Southeastern Michigan
Personnel:
Individual: Arthur Cooper
Organization:University of Michigan Department of Botany
Email Address:
awcooper1953@gmail.com
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: H. H. Bartlett Fund

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:complete
Frequency:

Additional Info

Additional Information:
 

The author is indebted for financial assistance to the Rackham School of Graduate Studies and to the H. H. Bartlett Fund, both of the University of Michigan. The Department of Meteorology assisted with the microclimatic instrumentation and the School of Natural Resources permitted use of their soils laboratory. Dr. Rogers MeVaugh, University of Michigan, assisted with identification of unknown plants and Dr. Irving J. Cantrall, Curator of the E. S. George Reserve, provided information on the history of the Reserve and made available its numerous facilities. Special thanks are due Dr. Stanley A. Cain and Dr. William S. Benninghoff for their assistance and guidance.

Other Metadata

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo