Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Dataset from University of Idaho 2004, master's thesis [Littoral ecology of epilithic algae in the Rocky Reach Pool, Mid-Columbia River (Washington State) - The effects of reservoir fluctuations.]

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:edi.830.2
Title:Dataset from University of Idaho 2004, master's thesis [Littoral ecology of epilithic algae in the Rocky Reach Pool, Mid-Columbia River (Washington State) - The effects of reservoir fluctuations.]
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:
(Abstract from thesis) Epilithic algae, water column physical/chemical properties, and sediments were examined in the impounded Mid-Columbia River including the Rocky Reach Reservoir. Primary objectives included determination of the effects reservoir drawdown has on epilithic algae and potential nutrient enrichment via sediment. Epilithic algae were analyzed by pigment concentration, gravimetrically, and species composition. Reservoir elevation fluctuated at higher rates at tailrace sites (0.41-0.25 m/hr) compared to the forebay site (0.06-0.08 m/hr). Littoral exposure times were also greater at tailrace sites (mean of 8 hrs compared to 0 hr at the forebay site). Mean epilithic algae monochromatic chlorophyll a over all sampling periods at mainstem sites was 76.7 ± 4.8 mg/m2 (95 % C.I.). Epilithic algae monochromatic chlorophyll a in the zone of water fluctuation (0-1 m) was less at Wells tailrace (38.8 mg/m2) compared to Rocky Reach forebay (141.3 mg/m2) during summer, 2000 and 2001. Mean epilithic biofilm ash-free oven-dry weight over all sampling periods at mainstem sites was 25.6 ± 1.5 g/m2 (95 % C.I.). Mean autotrophic index across all mainstem locations was 439 indicating a large heterotrophic component within the epilithic biofilms. Epilithic algae communities were dominated by diatoms (50.2 %) and cyanobacteria (35.9 %), with some green algae (13.8 %). Canonical correlation analysis indicated that temperature, depth, site, and the water elevation change rate were important controllers of epilithic algae chlorophyll pigments. Mean textural characteristics of dredged sediment were 51.1 % sand, 43.2 % silt, and 5.7 % clay. Mean organic matter content in this sediment was 4.1 %. The mean seston sedimentation rate across mainstem locations was 11.3 g m-2 d-1 and organic matter comprised 14.7 % of the material collected from the water column.
Publication Date:2022-04-25
For more information:
Visit: DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period
Begin:
1999-11-04
End:
2001-09-02

People and Organizations
Contact:Scofield, Ben D  [  email ]
Creator:Scofield, Ben D 
Associate:Falter, C Michael (University of Idaho, Professor Emeritus, Major Professor )

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
rreach_sites
Description:
Rocky Reach study sites
Data Table Name:
rreach_samp_notes
Description:
Field sampling notes including conditions on sampling dates.
Data Table Name:
rreach_profs
Description:
Vertical profiles of water column physical and chemical measurements.
Data Table Name:
rreach_ABA
Description:
Epilithic algae biomass measures
Data Table Name:
rreach_sed_text
Description:
Dredged sediment characteristics
Data Table Name:
rreach_sed_trap
Description:
Sediment characteristics observed from sediment traps placed in littoral areas for ~30 days
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/830/2/0ab77a9ff8f8a6c507afeacf14759d3f
Name:rreach_sites
Description:Rocky Reach study sites
Number of Records:12
Number of Columns:6

Table Structure
Object Name:rreach_sites.csv
Size:1189 byte
Authentication:5f486019dc6a58e1a807fc6c0e5831a0 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 site_codelocationbanklatlondesc
Column Name:site_code  
location  
bank  
lat  
lon  
desc  
Definition:This is the site code for a littoral sampling site.This is a more descriptive name for the sampling site's location.This is the river bank that a sample was collected from. The river bank side is determined by looking downstream.Approximate latitude of a sampling site.Approximate longitude of a sampling siteGeneral description of a sampling site.
Storage Type:string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
string  
Measurement Type:nominalnominalnominalratiorationominal
Measurement Values Domain:
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1L
DefinitionLittoral site 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2L
DefinitionLittoral site 2
Source
Code Definition
Code3L
DefinitionLittoral site 3
Source
Code Definition
Code4L
DefinitionLittoral site 4
Source
Code Definition
Code5L
DefinitionLittoral site 5
Source
Code Definition
Code6L
DefinitionLittoral site 6
Source
DefinitionThis is a more descriptive name for the sampling site's location.
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeleft
Definitionleft bank
Source
Code Definition
Coderight
Definitionright bank
Source
Unitdegree
Typereal
Unitdegree
Typereal
DefinitionGeneral description of a sampling site.
Missing Value Code:          
CodeNA
Expldescription not available
Accuracy Report:            
Accuracy Assessment:            
Coverage:            
Methods:            

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/830/2/37aa5079327aa24a6629de396643ed36
Name:rreach_samp_notes
Description:Field sampling notes including conditions on sampling dates.
Number of Records:54
Number of Columns:16

Table Structure
Object Name:rreach_samp_notes.csv
Size:10274 byte
Authentication:cd286ccd98121f516473b0af18d967f5 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 uidsite_codedatetimedatetimeincid_d_luxincid_u_luxincid_luxsecchi_mcrewwater_descweathernoteentry_idlocationmonth_yr
Column Name:uid  
site_code  
date  
time  
datetime  
incid_d_lux  
incid_u_lux  
incid_lux  
secchi_m  
crew  
water_desc  
weather  
note  
entry_id  
location  
month_yr  
Definition:Unique sample identifier that's a concatenation of the site code and date (excel format).This is the site code for a littoral sampling sitesampling datesampling time in H M SDate and timeIncident light measurement at the beginning of water column profileIncident light measurement at the bottom of water column profileMean incident light measurementSecchi disk transparencyInitials of the field sampling crew.General description of river/reservoir conditions at the time of samplingDescription of weather conditions at the time of samplingNotes taken during the time of samplingSequential entry numberThis is a more descriptive name for the sampling site's location.Concatenation of sampling month abbreviation and year
Storage Type:string  
string  
dateTime  
string  
dateTime  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
string  
string  
Measurement Type:nominalnominaldateTimenominaldateTimeratioratioratiorationominalnominalnominalnominalrationominalnominal
Measurement Values Domain:
DefinitionUnique sample identifier that's a concatenation of the site code and date (excel format).
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1L
DefinitionLittoral site 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2L
DefinitionLittoral site 2
Source
Code Definition
Code3L
DefinitionLittoral site 3
Source
Code Definition
Code4L
DefinitionLittoral site 4
Source
Code Definition
Code5L
DefinitionLittoral site 5
Source
Code Definition
Code6L
DefinitionLittoral site 6
Source
FormatYYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ
Precision
Definitionsampling time in H M S
FormatYYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ
Precision
Unitlux
Typeinteger
Unitlux
Typereal
Unitlux
Typeinteger
Unitmeter
Typereal
DefinitionInitials of the field sampling crew.
DefinitionGeneral description of river/reservoir conditions at the time of sampling
DefinitionDescription of weather conditions at the time of sampling
DefinitionNotes taken during the time of sampling
Unitunitless
Typeinteger
DefinitionThis is a more descriptive name for the sampling site's location.
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeNov_1999
DefinitionNovember 1999
Source
Code Definition
CodeDec_1999
DefinitionDecember 1999
Source
Code Definition
CodeFeb_2000
DefinitionFebruary 2000
Source
Code Definition
CodeApr_2000
DefinitionApril 2000
Source
Code Definition
CodeJul_2000
DefinitionJuly 2000
Source
Code Definition
CodeAug_2000
DefinitionAugust 2000
Source
Code Definition
CodeJul_2001
DefinitionJuly 2001
Source
Code Definition
CodeAug_2001
DefinitionAugust 2001
Source
Code Definition
CodeSep_2001
DefinitionSeptember 2001
Source
Missing Value Code:            
CodeNA
Explnot available
 
CodeNA
Explnot available
 
CodeNA
Explnot available
CodeNA
Expldescription not available
CodeNA
Expldescription not available
     
Accuracy Report:                                
Accuracy Assessment:                                
Coverage:                                
Methods:                                

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/830/2/95d35fb304af5cdff2e4680cf7148a74
Name:rreach_profs
Description:Vertical profiles of water column physical and chemical measurements.
Number of Records:1066
Number of Columns:15

Table Structure
Object Name:rreach_profs.csv
Size:120508 byte
Authentication:4da92aea84f3a848b2fad38703d2dfc5 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 uidsite_codedatedepth_mtemp_Clight_d_luxlight_u_luxlight_luxcond_uS.cmDO_mg.Llocationincid_d_luxmonth_yrperc_translight_cond
Column Name:uid  
site_code  
date  
depth_m  
temp_C  
light_d_lux  
light_u_lux  
light_lux  
cond_uS.cm  
DO_mg.L  
location  
incid_d_lux  
month_yr  
perc_trans  
light_cond  
Definition:Unique sample identifier that's a concatenation of the site code and date (excel format).This is the site code for a littoral sampling sitesampling dateMeasurement depthwater temperatureLight intensity at depth sampling down into the water columnLight intensity at depth sampling back up the water columnMean light intensity sampling up and down the water columnSpecific conductance at depthDissolved oxygen concentration at depthThis is a more descriptive name for the sampling site's location.Incident light measurement at the beginning of water column profileConcatenation of sampling month abbreviation and yearPercent of incident light transmission at depthLight condition for substrate at depth i.e. within the photic or aphotic zone
Storage Type:string  
string  
dateTime  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
float  
string  
float  
string  
Measurement Type:nominalnominaldateTimeratioratioratioratioratioratiorationominalrationominalrationominal
Measurement Values Domain:
DefinitionUnique sample identifier that's a concatenation of the site code and date (excel format).
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1L
DefinitionLittoral site 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2L
DefinitionLittoral site 2
Source
Code Definition
Code3L
DefinitionLittoral site 3
Source
Code Definition
Code4L
DefinitionLittoral site 4
Source
Code Definition
Code5L
DefinitionLittoral site 5
Source
Code Definition
Code6L
DefinitionLittoral site 6
Source
FormatYYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ssZ
Precision
Unitmeter
Typereal
Unitcelsius
Typereal
Unitlux
Typereal
Unitlux
Typereal
Unitlux
Typereal
Unitmicrosiemens per centimeter
Typereal
UnitmilligramPerLiter
Typereal
DefinitionThis is a more descriptive name for the sampling site's location.
Unitlux
Typeinteger
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeNov_1999
DefinitionNovember 1999
Source
Code Definition
CodeDec_1999
DefinitionDecember 1999
Source
Code Definition
CodeFeb_2000
DefinitionFebruary 2000
Source
Code Definition
CodeApr_2000
DefinitionApril 2000
Source
Code Definition
CodeJul_2000
DefinitionJuly 2000
Source
Code Definition
CodeAug_2000
DefinitionAugust 2000
Source
Code Definition
CodeJul_2001
DefinitionJuly 2001
Source
Code Definition
CodeAug_2001
DefinitionAugust 2001
Source
Code Definition
CodeSep_2001
DefinitionSeptember 2001
Source
Unitpercent
Typereal
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codephotic
DefinitionPhotic zone
Source
Code Definition
Codeaphotic
DefinitionAphotic zone
Source
Code Definition
Codenan
DefinitionNot available
Source
Missing Value Code:        
CodeNA
Explnot available
CodeNA
Explnot available
CodeNA
Explnot available
CodeNA
Explnot available
CodeNA
Explnot available
CodeNA
Explnot available
     
CodeNA
Explnot available
CodeNA
Explnot available
Accuracy Report:                              
Accuracy Assessment:                              
Coverage:                              
Methods:                              

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/830/2/941d782993720a7afbf5f7a4b09e7d56
Name:rreach_ABA
Description:Epilithic algae biomass measures
Number of Records:992
Number of Columns:18

Table Structure
Object Name:rreach_ABA.csv
Size:101757 byte
Authentication:d513239e2e1d90db2391b2763ec97a37 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 idyrseasonmonthdatetimesite_codebankzonedredge_nomchlapheotchlatchlbtchlcodwafodwAI_mchlaAI_tchla
Column Name:id  
yr  
season  
month  
datetime  
site_code  
bank  
zone  
dredge_no  
mchla  
pheo  
tchla  
tchlb  
tchlc  
odw  
afodw  
AI_mchla  
AI_tchla  
Definition:Sample ID numberYearSeason that sample was collected insampling monthsampling dateThis is the site code for a littoral sampling siteThis is the river bank that a sample was collected from. The river bank side is determined by looking downstream.Water level drawdown zoneSample dredge (grab) numbermonochromatic chlorophyll apheophytintrichromatic chlorophyll atrichromatic chlorophyll btrichromatic chlorophyll cover dry weightash free oven dry weightautotrophic index (afodw/mchla)autotrophic index (afodw/tchla)
Storage Type:float  
string  
string  
string  
dateTime  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:ratiorationominalnominaldateTimenominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
Unitunitless
Typeinteger
Unitunitless
Typereal
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codefall
Definitionfall
Source
Code Definition
Codespring
Definitionspring
Source
Code Definition
Codesummer
Definitionsummer
Source
Code Definition
Codewinter
Definitionwinter
Source
Definitionsampling month
FormatYYYY-MM-DD hh:mm:ss
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1L
DefinitionLittoral site 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2L
DefinitionLittoral site 2
Source
Code Definition
Code3L
DefinitionLittoral site 3
Source
Code Definition
Code4L
DefinitionLittoral site 4
Source
Code Definition
Code5L
DefinitionLittoral site 5
Source
Code Definition
Code6L
DefinitionLittoral site 6
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeL
Definitionleft bank
Source
Code Definition
CodeR
Definitionright bank
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeA
DefinitionDrawdown zone where water levels can fluctuate daily from power peaking flows. Periphyton in this zone can become exposed to air.
Source
Code Definition
CodeB
DefinitionPermanently wetted zone. Periphyton in this zone does get exposed
Source
Unitunitless
Typeinteger
UnitmilligramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
UnitmilligramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
UnitmilligramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
UnitmilligramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
UnitmilligramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
UnitgramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
UnitgramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
Unitunitless
Typereal
Unitunitless
Typereal
Missing Value Code:                                    
Accuracy Report:                                    
Accuracy Assessment:                                    
Coverage:                                    
Methods:                                    

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/830/2/1400b4ecb6dd05bd3d329e0a4051b980
Name:rreach_sed_text
Description:Dredged sediment characteristics
Number of Records:44
Number of Columns:13

Table Structure
Object Name:rreach_sed_text.csv
Size:3334 byte
Authentication:ede0bc30ebd987dd50e9d80fee10fc02 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 datesite_codedepth_mbankdredgeredox_mVtemp_Cper_omper_sandper_siltper_clay
Column Name:date  
site_code  
depth_m  
bank  
dredge  
redox_mV  
temp_C  
odw  
afodw  
per_om  
per_sand  
per_silt  
per_clay  
Definition:sampling dateThis is the site code for a littoral sampling sitesampling depth of dredgeThis is the river bank that a sample was collected from. The river bank side is determined by looking downstream.dredge number / composite sampleSediment reduction oxidation potentialdredged sediment temperatureover dry weightash free oven dry weightpercent organic matterpercent sandpercent siltpercent clay
Storage Type:string  
string  
float  
string  
string  
float  
float  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:dateTimenominalrationominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1L
DefinitionLittoral site 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2L
DefinitionLittoral site 2
Source
Code Definition
Code3L
DefinitionLittoral site 3
Source
Code Definition
Code4L
DefinitionLittoral site 4
Source
Code Definition
Code5L
DefinitionLittoral site 5
Source
Unitmeter
Typereal
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeaug. '01 tran.
DefinitionAugust 2001 transect
Source
Code Definition
Codedeep water #2
Definitiondeep water (mid channel)
Source
Code Definition
Codejuly '01 tran.
DefinitionJuly 2001 transect
Source
Code Definition
CodeL
Definitionleft bank
Source
Code Definition
CodeR
Definitionright bank
Source
Definitiondredge number / composite sample
Unitmillivolt
Typereal
Unitcelsius
Typereal
Unitgram
Typereal
Unitgram
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Missing Value Code:                          
Accuracy Report:                          
Accuracy Assessment:                          
Coverage:                          
Methods:                          

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/830/2/8d34b0072c62f7e76a0fd836ac08f53d
Name:rreach_sed_trap
Description:Sediment characteristics observed from sediment traps placed in littoral areas for ~30 days
Number of Records:78
Number of Columns:13

Table Structure
Object Name:rreach_sed_trap.csv
Size:6649 byte
Authentication:f38f708817a25592cc1ca611f2716595 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 monthyeardepl_dateretr_datesite_codetrap_typebankzonedepth_modw_g.m2.dafodw_g.m2.dper_omnote
Column Name:month  
year  
depl_date  
retr_date  
site_code  
trap_type  
bank  
zone  
depth_m  
odw_g.m2.d  
afodw_g.m2.d  
per_om  
note  
Definition:deployment monthdeployment yearsediment trap deployment startsediment trap retrieval date This is the site code for a littoral sampling sitesediment trap subsample typeriver bank where sediment trap was placedwater level drawdown zonesediment trap deployment depthover dry weightash free oven dry weightpercent organic matterField observations noted during sediment trap retrieval
Storage Type:string  
float  
dateTime  
dateTime  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
Measurement Type:nominalratiodateTimedateTimenominalnominalnominalnominalratioratioratiorationominal
Measurement Values Domain:
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeaug
DefinitionAugust deployment
Source
Code Definition
Codejul
DefinitionJuly deployment
Source
Unitdeployment year
Typereal
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1L
DefinitionLittoral site 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2L
DefinitionLittoral site 2
Source
Code Definition
Code3L
DefinitionLittoral site 3
Source
Code Definition
Code4L
DefinitionLittoral site 4
Source
Code Definition
Code5L
DefinitionLittoral site 5
Source
Code Definition
Code6L
DefinitionLittoral site 6
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codecontrol
Definitioncollection pipe turned upside down i.e. open side facing toward sediment
Source
Code Definition
Codeopen
Definitioncollection pipe open to collect settling sediment
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeL
Definitionleft bank facing downstream
Source
Code Definition
CodeR
Definitionright bank facing downstream
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeB
DefinitionPermanently wetted zone, where sediments are not exposed from fluctuating water levels
Source
Unitmeter
Typereal
UnitgramPerMeterSquaredPerDay
Typereal
UnitgramPerMeterSquaredPerDay
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
DefinitionField observations noted during sediment trap retrieval
Missing Value Code:                          
Accuracy Report:                          
Accuracy Assessment:                          
Coverage:                          
Methods:                          

Data Package Usage Rights

This data package is released to the "public domain" under Creative Commons CC0 1.0 "No Rights Reserved" (see: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). It is considered professional etiquette to provide attribution of the original work if this data package is shared in whole or by individual components. A generic citation is provided for this data package on the website https://portal.edirepository.org (herein "website") in the summary metadata page. Communication (and collaboration) with the creators of this data package is recommended to prevent duplicate research or publication. This data package (and its components) is made available "as is" and with no warranty of accuracy or fitness for use. The creators of this data package and the website shall not be liable for any damages resulting from misinterpretation or misuse of the data package or its components. Periodic updates of this data package may be available from the website. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
(No thesaurus)epilithic algae, littoral ecology, sediment, reservoir fluctuation, Columbia River, periphyton, attached benthic algae
LTER Controlled Vocabularylimnology

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:
(Methods from thesis) Limnologic Parameters Physical, chemical, and biological aspects of the study area were sampled on the following dates: November 4-5, 1999; December 7-9, 1999; February 17-18, 2000; April 20-21, 2000; July 14-15, 2000; August 15-17, 2000; July 7-12, 2001; August 4-6, 2001 and; September 1-2, 2001. Seasons were defined as: December and February (Winter); April (Spring); July and August (Summer); and September and November (Fall). River flow and reservoir hydraulic retention times (total volume / outflow rate) were calculated using USGS gauging station data at Rocky Reach Dam (station 12453700). Reservoir water level elevations were downloaded from the “DART River Environment” website (DART 2002). Temperature (YSI ® 57), dissolved oxygen (YSI ® 57), and specific conductance (YSI ® 30) were measured with calibrated meters and probes. Transparency and light penetration were measured with a standard 20 cm Secchi disk and calibrated LiCor ® photometer. Flow measurements were taken with a Marsh-McBirney ® flowmeter. Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP), nitrate (NO3), nitrite (NO2), ammonia / ammonium (NH4 + NH3), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and pH measurements of the water column were obtained from a concurrent pelagic study (Rensel et al. 2001). Nutrient concentrations were determined from composite samples taken with an integrated sampling tube from depths of 1 m to mid-water column. Epilithic Algae Epilithic algae were sampled from littoral rocks (natural substrates) along with water column parameters. At one sampling event, 10 epilithic algae samples were taken from each riverbank (20 samples per site) for a total of 120 epilithic algae samples per time. At each riverbank, nine of the samples were used for pigment / biomass analysis and one was used for taxonomic identification. Riverbanks were designated left or right when facing downstream. Samples at each bank were split into two depth zones, five replicates from the A zone and five replicates from the B zone. The A zone was defined as the zone of water level fluctuation relative to full pool (0-1 m) and the B zone was defined as the permanently wetted zone (>1 m water depth relative to full pool). Within each depth zone epilithic algae samples were obtained from relatively flat stones by random dredging (Petite Ponar and Petersen dredges). Epilithic algae was scraped from a 0.0220 m2 area from the top of the stone, then carefully washed into a clean centrifuge tube. The area scraped was determined following past epilithic algae studies on the Mid-Columbia and Lower Snake River (Falter and Kraemer 2000; Kraemer 2000). All epilithic algae samples were stored on ice and in the dark. Epilithic algae composition samples were stored in 50 ml centrifuge tubes and preserved with Lugol’s iodine solution at a ratio of one part iodine solution to five parts water / epilithic algae. Composition samples were stored at 4º C. The night following collection, the pigment and biomass samples were membrane-filtered onto Whatman (GF/C 47mm diameter, 1.2 µm pore size) ashless filters and stored at 4º C in the dark. Upon returning from the field, pigment and biomass samples were frozen and stored for a maximum of six months before processing. Pigment / biomass samples were individually cut in two equal portions using a template. One half was macerated with a tissue grinder and steeped in MgCO3 saturated acetone for 24 hrs before pigment analysis. Chlorophyll and pheophytin were measured with a Beckman ® Model DU-640 spectrophotometer. Monochromatic chlorophyll a, pheophytin, trichromatic chlorophyll a, b, and c were determined according to APHA (1992) standard method 10200 H (1-2). The other half of the split sample was used for gravimetric biomass analysis. Oven-dry weight (ODW) and ash-free oven-dry weight (AFODW) were determined using the gravimetric method described by APHA (1992) standard method 10200 I (5). This method does not indicate photoautotrophic biomass as directly as chlorophyll analysis since organic material from epilithic heterotrophs or decomposing organics is included in the AFODW. For this reason the term epilithic biofilm is used to describe AFODW and ODW. The autotrophic index was calculated by dividing the AFODW of a sample by its corresponding chlorophyll a (monochromatic or trichromatic) content. Algal species composition was determined to genus or nearest taxon (Prescott 1964) with a Wild ® M20-704479 compound light microscope at 150 times magnification. Using APHA (1992) standard method 10200 F (b) for intermediate magnification, algal cells were enumerated and identified. This was done with a Palmer-Maloney counting chamber and Whipple disk with micrometer-calibrated fields of vision. Chlorophyll accrual rates on artificial substrates were used as a surrogate for rates of epilithic algae primary production. These were deployed in July and August of 2001. The artificial substrates were allowed to incubate for 30 days in the permanently wetted littoral of each site on both riverbanks. Three artificial substrates were deployed near each riverbank. An artificial substrate consisted of one, square (15 cm × 15 cm), unglazed, terra cotta tile fastened to the top of a masonry brick resting on the bottom. The three artificial substrates were placed to have similar flow, aspect, and depth. Artificial substrates were deployed and retrieved with snorkeling gear. After slow retrieval to minimize current scouring, the light-exposed tile surface (0.0225 m2) was scraped with a razor blade and attached growth dispensed into a centrifuge tube as before. Area scraped again determined by following previous attached algae work by Kraemer (2000). Analysis of chlorophyll pigments and biomass proceeded as described for natural substrates. Sub-Littoral and Pelagic Zone Sediments Dredged sediment samples were collected on: July 14-15, 2000; August 15-17, 2000; July 11-12, 2001; and August 4-5, 2001. In 2000, sediments were sampled in suspected depositional zones (eddies and thalweg) at each site. During 2000 sampling, every site except the tributary site (Entiat River) had dredges taken in three areas. Two were suspected depositional areas near each riverbank and the other was the channel thalweg. At one of these sampling points, dredging was continued until three successful dredges were taken. A dredge was considered successful when the dredge hit the bottom squarely, closed properly, and yielded either a totally empty or full dredge sample. Some sediment and benthic substrate was too large to collect (stones > 0.25 m). Some of the 2000 sediment samples were combined into a composite sample and homogenized before storage because of a small sediment return with some dredges. In 2001 a systematic sampling approach was used by dredging along a transect perpendicular to the shoreline at 10 m increments at each site except for the Entiat River where dredges were taken every 3 m. Since sampling procedures differed during summer 2000 and 2001, some results from both years were combined. All sediment dredging was done with a weighted, petite Ponar dredge (225 cm2 surface area) and electric winch. Upon retrieval of dredges, in the field, particle size was estimated by the modified Wentwoth scale (Cummins 1962); observation of any organisms present (aquatic macrophytes or benthic in-fauna); sediment color pattern; and sediment smell (no smell, putrid, or H2S). Along with those qualitative characteristics, the oxidation / reduction (redox) potential, temperature, and pH of the fine sediments were measured according to chapter 5.2.1 of Murdoch and Azcue (1995). These sediment characteristics where measured with an Orion ® pH / Eh meter with temperature probe. Calibrated Orion ® Pt / AgCl2 redox and Orion Sureflow ® pH probes were immediately inserted into an undisturbed dredged sample and allowed to equilibrate for 5 to 10 minutes. Field redox potentials were corrected for temperature and electrode response to Zobell’s standard reading (Kehew 2001). After field measurements, dredged samples were stirred and placed into a quart size sealable plastic freezer bag. Sediment samples were stored at 4º C for up to 72 hr until freezing at lab for later processing. In preparation for analysis, sediment samples were thawed and oven-dried at 65º C for at least 24 hr. After drying, samples were hand ground and separated into two portions, one for particle size analysis and the other for gravimetric biomass analysis. Particle size was determined using 100 g of sieved, dispersed, and temperature-compensated sediment by the Bouyoucos method (1962). Particle size was reported as percent sand (2.0-0.05 mm), silt (0.05-0.002 mm), and clay (< 0.002 mm). Gravimetric biomass analysis included oven drying ≈ 15 g of previously dried and ground sediment at 105º C for 14 hr or until constant ODW. This was followed by combusting all organic matter in a muffle furnace at 505º C for one hr (AFODW). AFODW divided by ODW gave percent organic matter. In addition to dredged sediments, sediment traps were deployed in July and August, 2001. In July, one sediment trap was deployed at each site near shore in 2-3 m of water. In August three sediment traps were deployed at Wells tailrace and Daroga Park. Sediment traps were placed in low velocity (≈ 0 m/s) water at 2-3 m depth near shore by snorkeling divers. Care was taken to avoid suspending sediments during deployment and recovery. Sediment traps consisted of a steel rack containing six PVC cylinders (35.6 cm × 8.1 cm) with plate bottoms (Falter and Burris 1996). Five cylinders were placed upright to measure the sedimentation rate from the water column. One cylinder faced down to act as a control for attached growth on the inside of the cylinder and upward flux of sediment. Sediment traps were in place for 30 days. Upon retrieval, the cylinders were capped and brought to the surface. Most of the water was drained from cylinders then the remaining sediments were resuspended. The resuspended sediment was completely drained into a 1 L Cubitainer ® and placed on ice until freezing. Gravimetric biomass analysis was performed on the trapped sediment as described with dredged sediment. All trapped sediment was oven-dried and combusted to calculate deposition rates for ODW, AFODW, and percent organic matter.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@environmentaldatainitiative.org
Web Address:
https://environmentaldatainitiative.org
Id:https://ror.org/0330j0z60
Creators:
Individual: Ben D Scofield
Email Address:
bdscofield.wrk@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-1555
Contacts:
Individual: Ben D Scofield
Email Address:
bdscofield.wrk@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-1555
Associated Parties:
Individual: C Michael Falter
Organization:University of Idaho
Position:Professor Emeritus
Role:Major Professor

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
1999-11-04
End:
2001-09-02
Geographic Region:
Description:Central Washington State, Columbia River
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  47.91744Southern:  47.47014
Western:  -120.31928Eastern:  -119.88844
Altitude Minimum:611.0Altitude Maximum:721.0

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Rocky Reach Attached Benthic Algae
Personnel:
Individual: Ben D Scofield
Email Address:
bdscofield.wrk@gmail.com
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-1555
Role:Graduate Student
Individual: C Michael Falter
Organization:University of Idaho
Position:Professor Emeritus
Role:Major Professor

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:The dataset is provided "as is" upon completion of the thesis.
Frequency:
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'unitless'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'unitless'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'Ratio of afodw to chlorophyll a'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'microsiemens per centimeter'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'microsiemens per centimeter'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'deployment year'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'deployment year'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'emlEditor'
        |     |        \___attribute 'app' = 'ezEML'
        |     |        \___attribute 'release' = '2022.04.25'
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo