Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and iron-bound organic carbon in surficial sediment and settling particulate material from Falling Creek and Beaverdam Reservoirs in 2019 and 2021

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:edi.881.2
Title:Total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and iron-bound organic carbon in surficial sediment and settling particulate material from Falling Creek and Beaverdam Reservoirs in 2019 and 2021
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

This dataset includes measurements of sediment properties (total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and iron-bound organic carbon) in surficial sediment and sedimenting material from two reservoirs: Falling Creek and Beaverdam Reservoirs, both located in Vinton, VA, USA. To measure surficial sediment properties, sediment cores were collected at the deepest site in each reservoir using a gravity corer, and the top 1 cm was frozen then lyophilized. Sediment cores were collected approximately once per month in both reservoirs throughout the stratified period (May–November) in 2019 and 2021, though sampling frequency and duration varied by reservoir and year. Sedimenting material was sampled using sediment traps suspended approximately 1 m above the sediment in both reservoirs. Iron-bound organic carbon was measured using the citrate-bicarbonate-dithionite method, and we used a CN analyzer (Elementar VarioMax, Ronkonkoma, NY, USA) to determine the amount of OC per unit mass of sediment.

Publication Date:2022-06-28
For more information:
Visit: DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period
Begin:
2019-07-08
End:
2021-11-09

People and Organizations
Contact:Carey, Cayelan C. (Virginia Tech) [  email ]
Creator:Carey, Cayelan C. (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Lewis, Abigail S. L. (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Schreiber, Madeline E. (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Niederlehner, B. R. (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Das, Arpita (Virginia Tech)
Creator:Carey, Cayelan C. (Virginia Tech)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
Reservoir sediment dataset
Description:
Dataset of sediment organic carbon and iron-bound organic carbon extractions
Other Name:
Reservoir sediment code
Description:
Reservoir sediment data processing code
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/881/2/b659e7b16c67504da4554568abc9d841
Name:Reservoir sediment dataset
Description:Dataset of sediment organic carbon and iron-bound organic carbon extractions
Number of Records:222
Number of Columns:15

Table Structure
Object Name:Reservoir_sediment.csv
Size:19443 bytes
Authentication:851d7ad8ce70511cb39d2073fc24d202 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Reservoir  
Date_collected  
Sed_trap  
Rep  
Type  
Initial_sed_mg  
Vial_mg  
Vial_with_sed_mg  
Vial_with_sed_after_fumig_mg  
CN_mg  
N_mg  
C_mg  
Notes  
Flag_C  
Flag_N  
Definition:Three-letter code corresponding to sampled reservoirDate that sediment core or sedimenting material was collectedIs this a sediment trap sample? True = sediment trap, False = sediment coreReplicate numberStage of iron-bound organic carbon analysis. Init = initial, unextracted sediment. Con = control extraction. Ext = Dithionite extractionInitial amount of sediment used in iron-bound organic carbon extractionMass of 20-mL vial used for fumigationMass of dry sediment plus vial massMass of dry, fumigated sediment plus vial massMass of sediment used for carbon and nitrogen analysisMass of nitrogen (determined by carbon and nitrogen analysis)Mass of carbon (determined by carbon and nitrogen analysis)Miscellaneous notes about this sampleFlag for C analysis. 0 = not suspect. 1 = sample spilled during extraction and mass is incorrect. 2 = measurement suspect (reason described in notes column)Flag for N analysis. 0 = not suspect. 1 = sample spilled during extraction and mass is incorrect. 2 = measurement suspect (reason described in notes column)
Storage Type:string  
date  
string  
float  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:nominaldateTimenominalrationominalratioratioratioratioratioratiorationominalratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeb
DefinitionBeaverdam Reservoir
Source
Code Definition
Codef
DefinitionFalling Creek Reservoir
Source
Formatyyyy-mm-dd
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeFALSE
DefinitionThis sample is NOT a sediment trap sample
Source
Code Definition
CodeTRUE
DefinitionThis sample IS a sediment trap sample
Source
Unitdimensionless
Typenatural
Min
Max
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codecon
DefinitionControl (NaCl extraction)
Source
Code Definition
Codeext
DefinitionReduction (Dithionite extraction)
Source
Code Definition
Codeinit
DefinitionInitial sediment (not extracted)
Source
Unitmilligram
Typereal
Min10.9 
Max101.3 
Unitmilligram
Typereal
Min13395.17 
Max16707.3 
Unitmilligram
Typereal
Min13544.8 
Max16767.9 
Unitmilligram
Typereal
Min13479 
Max16755.55 
Unitmilligram
Typereal
Min10.34 
Max105.13 
Unitmilligram
Typereal
Min0.0867526 
Max2.4107391 
Unitmilligram
Typereal
Min0.9261538 
Max18.2616379 
DefinitionMiscellaneous notes about this sample
Unitdimensionless
Typewhole
Min
Max
Unitdimensionless
Typewhole
Min
Max
Missing Value Code:                              
Accuracy Report:                              
Accuracy Assessment:                              
Coverage:                              
Methods:                              

Non-Categorized Data Resource

Name:Reservoir sediment code
Entity Type:unknown
Description:Reservoir sediment data processing code
Physical Structure Description:
Object Name:Reservoir_sediment_clean_current.Rmd
Size:28085 bytes
Authentication:d335278b79ceb5c5a94811e4c642cbbe Calculated By MD5
Externally Defined Format:
Format Name:text/x-markdown
Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/881/2/2b27c0a5514046bbc2ff920cc360e3fa

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
carey lab controlled vocabularyVirginia Tech, Carey Lab, Western Virginia Water Authority, Falling Creek Reservoir, Beaverdam Reservoir, Sedimentation trap, Settling material, Iron-bound organic carbon, Citrate bicarbonate dithionite
cuahsi controlled vocabularySediment, Carbon, total organic, Nitrogen, organic, Lake, Reservoir, Organic matter, Core
lter controlled vocabularyBiogeochemistry, Sedimentation, Fe

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Surficial sediments

On each sampling date, we collected four replicate hypolimnetic sediment cores using a K-B gravity sediment corer (Wildlife Supply Company, Yulee, FL, USA). Cores were collected in the deepest part of each reservoir, approximately 20 m from where water samples were taken. In 2019, each core was capped and kept on ice while transported back to the lab, where the top 1 centimeter of sediment from each core was immediately extruded, collected, and frozen in scintillation vials for future analysis. In 2021, cores were extruded in the field, and the samples were kept on ice while being transported back to the lab.

Sediment traps

To determine the amount of Fe-OC and total OC in material sedimenting from the water column, we deployed 19-L buckets approximately 1 m above the sediments at the deepest point of each reservoir (8 m at FCR and 10 m at BVR). These sediment traps were deployed from June–December 2021 and sampled every two weeks by slowly bringing the bucket to the surface, decanting and discarding water from the bucket, collecting up to 5 L of the remaining water and sediment, and transporting this material back to the lab on ice. Upon arriving at the lab, we allowed the sediment to settle for approximately 5 minutes, before decanting and discarding as much water as possible and filling four 50-mL centrifuge tubes with the remaining material. The samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 3100 rpm, then combined into one vial and frozen for later analysis. No sediment traps were collected and analyzed for Fe-OC in 2019.

Fe-OC analysis

We analyzed the amount of Fe-OC in samples of sediment and settling material using the citrate bicarbonate dithionite (CBD) method. This method was first described for marine systems by Lalonde et al. (2012) and has since been adapted for freshwater lakes by Peter and Sobek (2018). It is important to note that our measurement of Fe-OC as the percentage of OC that is extractable using the CBD method is an operational definition (Fisher et al., 2021). We used this method to enable comparisons both between oxygen treatments and with other published work that used the same general approach (e.g., Lalonde et al., 2012; Peter & Sobek, 2018).

Following the CBD method, each sediment sample was freeze-dried and divided into three treatments: initial, reduction, and control. “Initial” samples received no treatment and were used to measure the OC content of the sediment. “Reduction” samples were treated with a metal-complexing agent (trisodium citrate) and reducing agent (sodium dithionite) in a buffered solution (sodium bicarbonate) to measure how much Fe and OC were released as a result of Fe reduction. Control samples were used to account for the release of Fe and OC in the reduction treatment that resulted from processes other than Fe reduction. They were treated with the same buffer (sodium bicarbonate) and sodium chloride in the same ionic strength as the trisodium citrate and sodium dithionite of the reduction treatment.

For both the control and reduction treatments, we measured 100 mg of homogenized, freeze-dried sediment into 15-mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes (Falcon Blue, Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). We then added 6 mL of either control or reduction buffer solution (0.11 M sodium bicarbonate) to each tube. The reduction buffer contained 0.27 M trisodium citrate, while the control buffer contained 1.6 M sodium chloride. After heating samples to 80ºC in an oven, 0.1 g sodium dithionite was added to the reduction samples and 0.088 g sodium chloride was added to control samples, and samples were kept at 80ºC for an additional 15 min. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 3100 RPM, and the supernatant was collected in a 50-mL centrifuge tube. This extraction process was repeated two more times for both treatments (Peter and Sobek, 2018). Finally, samples were rinsed three times using artificial lake water, which was prepared by diluting Artificial Hard Water from Marking and Dawson (1973) to 12.5% with Type I reagent grade water.

After extraction, all sediment samples (including those in the initial treatment) were dried and acid-fumigated for 48 hours to remove remaining citrate and bicarbonate (Harris et al., 2001). Samples were then run on a CN analyzer (Elementar VarioMax, Ronkonkoma, NY, USA) to determine the amount of OC per unit mass of sediment. We adjusted sediment mass to account for Fe loss during control and reduction treatments. The amount of OC removed with Fe reduction (CBD-extractable OC) was calculated as the difference between the OC content of the control and reduction samples and expressed as a percentage of the initial OC content of the sediment.

Microcosm_sediment.Rmd provides the calculations associated with these sediment properties. We adjusted sediment mass to account for Fe loss during control and reduction treatments. The amount of OC removed with Fe reduction (CBD-extractable OC) was calculated as the difference between the OC content of the control and reduction samples and expressed as a percentage of the initial OC content of the sediment.

References

Fisher, B. J., Faust, J. C., Moore, O. W., Peacock, C. L., & März, C. (2021). Technical Note: Uncovering the influence of methodological variations on the extractability of iron bound organic carbon, 20.

Harris, D., Horwáth, W. R., & Kessel, C. van. (2001). Acid fumigation of soils to remove carbonates prior to total organic carbon or CARBON-13 isotopic analysis. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65(6), 1853–1856. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.1853

Lalonde, K., Mucci, A., Ouellet, A., & Gélinas, Y. (2012). Preservation of organic matter in sediments promoted by iron. Nature, 483(7388), 198–200. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10855

Marking, L. L., & Dawson, V. K. (1973). Toxicity of quinaldine sulfate to fish (Report No. 48) (pp. 0–8). La Crosse, WI. Retrieved from http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/2001015

Peter, S., & Sobek, S. (2018). High variability in iron-bound organic carbon among five boreal lake sediments. Biogeochemistry, 139(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-018-0456-8

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@edirepository.org
Web Address:
https://edirepository.org
Id:https://ror.org/0330j0z60
Creators:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Individual: Abigail S. L. Lewis
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
aslewis@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-4542
Individual: Madeline E. Schreiber
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
arpitadas@vt.edu
Individual: B. R. Niederlehner
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
bniederl@vt.edu
Individual: Arpita Das
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
mschreib@vt.edu
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Contacts:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2019-07-08
End:
2021-11-09
Geographic Region:
Description:Beaverdam Reservoir is located in Vinton, Virginia, USA
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  37.322865Southern:  37.311961
Western:  -79.824834Eastern:  -79.813848
Geographic Region:
Description:Falling Creek Reservoir is located in Vinton, Virginia, USA
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  37.309589Southern:  37.30266
Western:  -79.839249Eastern:  -79.836009

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:N/A
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: Western Virginia Water Authority N/A
Related Project:
Title:N/A
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: Virginia Tech Global Change Center N/A
Related Project:
Title:N/A
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: Fralin Life Sciences Institute N/A
Related Project:
Title:SCC-IRG Track 2: Resilient Water Systems: Integrating Environmental Sensor Networks and Real-Time Forecasting to Adaptively Manage Drinking Water Quality and Build Social Trust
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C.� Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation 1737424
Related Project:
Title:Collaborative Research: Consequences of changing oxygen availability for carbon cycling in freshwater ecosystems
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation 1753639
Related Project:
Title:Collaborative Research: CIBR: Cyberinfrastructure Enabling End-to-End Workflows for Aquatic Ecosystem Forecasting
Personnel:
Individual: Cayelan C. Carey
Organization:Virginia Tech
Email Address:
Cayelan@vt.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8835-4476
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation 1933016
Related Project:
Title:Collaborative Research: CIBR: Cyberinfrastructure Enabling End-to-End Workflows for Aquatic Ecosystem Forecasting
Personnel:
Individual: Renato J. Figueiredo
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9841-6060
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation 1933102

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:ongoing
Frequency:

Additional Info

Additional Information:
 

In 2012, FCR was equipped with a side-stream supersaturation hypolimnetic oxygenation (HOx) system to improve water quality in the reservoir (Gerling et al., 2014). This type of HOx system functions by withdrawing water from the bottom of the reservoir, adding concentrated, pressurized oxygen gas to supersaturate the water with dissolved oxygen (DO), and then returning the oxygenated water at the same depth and temperature. Previous work in FCR has shown that the HOx system effectively increases DO concentrations throughout the hypolimnion without altering temperature or decreasing thermal stability (Gerling et al., 2014). From 2013–2019, the HOx system in FCR was operated at variable rates, maintaining an oxygenated hypolimnion for at least part of the summer (Carey et al., 2022). Conversely, oxygenation was reduced in 2020 and 2021, maintaining primarily hypoxic conditions throughout the summer stratified period.

To assess how short-term changes in hypolimnetic DO concentrations impact Fe-OC on a whole-ecosystem scale, we operated the HOx in FCR on a variable schedule throughout the summer of 2019 (Carey et al., 2022). Oxygen was added in approximately two-week intervals at a rate of 25 kg O2 day-1 to the whole hypolimnion. Between oxygenation periods, we allowed the hypolimnion to become hypoxic over periods of at least two weeks without oxygenation. Because hypolimnetic volume varied throughout the summer (generally decreasing throughout the summer as the thermocline deepened), the mean concentration of oxygen added to the whole hypolimnion throughout an oxygenation period in 2019 ranged from 0.80 mg L-1 day-1 to 0.90 mg L-1 day-1.

References

Carey, C. C., Thomas, R. Q., & Hanson, P. C. (2022). General Lake Model-Aquatic EcoDynamics model parameter set for Falling Creek Reservoir, Vinton, Virginia, USA 2013-2019 [Data set]. Environmental Data Initiative.

Gerling, A. B., Browne, R. G., Gantzer, P. A., Mobley, M. H., Little, J. C., & Carey, C. C. (2014). First report of the successful operation of a side stream supersaturation hypolimnetic oxygenation system in a eutrophic, shallow reservoir. Water Research, 67, 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.09.002

Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'emlEditor'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'app'
        |     |     |     |___text 'EMLassemblyline'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'release'
        |     |     |     |___text '3.5.4'
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo