Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Periphyton Functional and Species Composition following Simulated Saltwater and Phosphorus Groundwater Intrusions, in Southeastern FL Everglades

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:edi.90013.1
Title:Periphyton Functional and Species Composition following Simulated Saltwater and Phosphorus Groundwater Intrusions, in Southeastern FL Everglades
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

This dataset is a record of the field and lab measurements I have made of my field manipulation trials, in which I am simulating groundwater intrusions of salt and phosphorus via controlled releases in the field and measuring the responses of the local environmental conditions and periphyton communities. Experimental manipulations were established on Sept. 22, 2020 and field collections subsequently occurred between Oct. 6 – Nov 16, 2020. The study site was in the FP&L Model Lands, just north of the E-137 canal. GPS coordinates 25º20’34.7” N, 80º24’41.2” W. Local environmental conditions were oligotrophic fresh waters in a shallow marl prairie with remarkably high calcareous periphyton growth. The manipulations were set up so that natural periphyton communities could colonize controlled substrate tiles which would expose the periphyton to four levels of concentrations of salt, phosphorus, both, and neither (control). After the manipulations were deployed, data and samples were collected on the environmental and periphyton conditions every two weeks for the next two months (four sampling events total). [4 ion concentrations x 4 exposure types x 4 sampling events = 64 samples, plus 2 samples of the non-disturbed natural periphyton community collected each time = 74 total samples]. My baseline data include records of the type and concentration of ions released for each plot, and each subsequent sampling event sampled the local water electrical conductivity (salt proxy), plus the periphyton biomass, community composition, and phosphorus content at each plot.

Publication Date:2021-03-02

Time Period
Begin:
2020-10-06
End:
2020-11-16

People and Organizations
Contact:Shannon, Thomas P (Florida International University, Graduate Student) [  email ]
Creator:Shannon, Thomas P (Florida International University, Graduate Student)
Creator:Gaiser, Evelyn E (Florida International University, Endowed George Barley Eminent Scholars Chair; Professor)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
Peri_Pilot_Data_Shannon
Description:
Data table containing field and lab measurements associated with periphyton field manipulation pilot study
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/90013/1/1a24f71be582aa772f289308be2a26f7
Name:Peri_Pilot_Data_Shannon
Description:Data table containing field and lab measurements associated with periphyton field manipulation pilot study
Number of Records:74
Number of Columns:13

Table Structure
Object Name:Peri_Pilot_Data_Shannon.csv
Size:3570
Authentication:ea6dbe63a6a428bd659e9736285dfec2 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 Sample_IDDate_SampledWeekTreatment_MethodExposure_TypeAFDM_empty_dishesAFDM_total_gAFDM_post_ignition_gTotal wet biovolume in mLWater electrical conductivityTotal phosphorusChlorophyll-aNotes
Column Name:Sample_ID  
Date_Sampled  
Week  
Treatment_Method  
Exposure_Type  
AFDM_empty_dishes  
AFDM_total_g  
AFDM_post_ignition_g  
Total_vol_ml  
Cond_us  
P_ug  
Chl_a  
Notes  
Definition:Unique sample ID code. Contains (in order) the sampling week, treatment method, and exposure type.Date that samples were collected in the fieldNumber representing the sequential biweekly sampling event in which a sample was collected. Allows me to not deal with dates when analyzing data.The method for ion release and the concentration (conc) of ions releasedThe chemical treatment type that the periphyton were exposed to in a given sampleThe weight of the empty tin tray used in laboratory ash-free dry mass measurements of collected periphyton. Measured to account for the addition and variation of tin tray weight when comparing pre- and post- ashed periphyton samples.The weight of the dried periphyton sub-sample to be ashed, in the tin tray, prior to ashing. The sub-sample taken is 40 mL of the total liquid sample (homogenized)The weight of the periphyton sub-sample that was ashed, in the tin tray, after ashing in the oven. Loss on ignition (representative of the mass of organic carbon in the sample) can be calculated by subtracting the AFDM_total_g from this value.The total liquid biovolume of the periphyton sample collected from each tile, containing a minimal amount of DI water needed to wash the periphyton off the tile.The water electrical conductivity of the surface water 1-3 cm directly above each experimental tile, measured in the field directly prior to tile collection.Total phosphorus content of the collected periphyton mat itself. Sub-sample is 120 mL of the total liquid sample (homogenized). Represented as per gram of periphyton, where grams of periphyton is extrapolated from the proportion of AFDM_total_g subsample volume relative to the total liquid periphyton biovolume. Chlorophyll-a content of periphyton. Measured from 2 mL sub-sample of total liquid sample, and made proportional to the dry mass.Notes column for detailing any observations or issues associated with the collection or processing of samples.
Storage Type:string  
dateTime  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
Measurement Type:nominaldateTimenominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratiorationominal
Measurement Values Domain:
DefinitionUnique sample ID code. Contains (in order) the sampling week, treatment method, and exposure type.
FormatMM-DD-YYYY
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definitionwhen samples were deployed
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definitionfirst collection
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definitionsecond collection
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definitionthird collection
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definitionfourth and final collection
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeA
Definitionsoaked tile, baseline conc
Source
Code Definition
CodeB
Definitionsoaked tile, boosted conc
Source
Code Definition
CodeD
Definitionsoaked tile, overkill conc
Source
Code Definition
CodeE
Definitionpellet bed, boosted conc
Source
Code Definition
CodeX
Definitionno treatment, baseline sample
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeB
Definitionnatural community baseline; no added chemicals and no collection tile.
Source
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitioncontrol tile; no added chemicals
Source
Code Definition
CodeP
Definitionphosphorus
Source
Code Definition
CodeS
Definitionsalt
Source
Code Definition
CodeSP
Definitionsalt and phosphorus
Source
Unitgram
Typereal
Unitgram
Typereal
Unitgram
Typereal
Unitmilliliter
Typereal
UnitmicroSiemenPerCentimeter
Typereal
UnitmicrogramsPerGramPeriphyton
Typereal
UnitmicrogramsPerGramPeriphyton
Typereal
DefinitionNotes column for detailing any observations or issues associated with the collection or processing of samples.
Missing Value Code:          
CodeBlank
ExplData not yet entered
CodeBlank
ExplData not yet entered
CodeBlank
ExplData not yet entered
CodeBlank
ExplData not yet entered
CodeNA
Expldata was not collected. Only applicable to baseline samples, which did not have a tile.
CodeBlank
ExplData not yet entered
CodeBlank
ExplData not yet entered
CodeBlank
Explno notes of note were noted
Accuracy Report:                          
Accuracy Assessment:                          
Coverage:                          
Methods:                          

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
LTER Controlled Vocabularyperiphyton, diatoms, wetlands, groundwater, soil water content, total phosphorus, seawater, community dynamics, biogeochemical processes, disturbance
(No thesaurus)nutrient diffusing substrates, Everglades, FCE LTER

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Setup:

All parts of this portion of the study which were conducted indoors took place in CASE 262 or CASE 186b. All appropriate COVID-19 precautions were taken when on campus. 4x4" limestone tiles were used as periphyton settlement plates in order to provide a standardized control colonization substrate and surface area which mimics the natural substrate of the Everglades exposed bedrock. In order to determine the best method for creating a consistent rate of release and in-water concentrations of ions, a field-based methodological study of the submerged pellet, pellet bed, and soaked tile treatment methods were conducted. Three ion concentrations (baseline, boosted overkill) of each method (soaked tile, pellet bed, buried pellet) and treatment type, (P, S, S+P, Control), were deployed, with a tile of each type retrieved every two weeks for two months. Each of those methods is described below. The three levels of deployed ion concentrations are designed to find the amount of P or salt necessary to deploy in order to maintain consistent long-term ion release for the whole duration of the study, while maintaining as close as possible to the target ion release rate concentrations of 0.01 mg P /L/day and 1 g NaCl /L/day.

For the initial field test, in order to conserve project resources and funds, only the three concentrations of soaked tiles and one (intermediate) concentration of the pellet bed methodology were deployed. {{tiles for P, S, S+P, and Control x [3 conc. @ soaked tile + 1 conc @ submerged] x 4 bi-weekly sampling occasions = 4x4x4 = 64 tiles total.}} If one of these methods proves successful in maintaining a long-term ion release over the duration of the study, that method will be used in further study. If none of the methods are successful, a second round of methods field testing will occur with methods altered based on the results of the first trial; higher or lower starting ion concentrations or use of the buried pellet method are the planned candidates for that second trial, should it be needed.

Methods were field tested in the FP&L restored natural lands, in the periphyton marshes near the intersection of Card Sound Rd. and the L-31E canal road.

Description:

Treatments:

Submerged pellet: Sensu Douglas et al. (2016), slow-release P nutrient pellets are deployed 7 cm below the sediment surface using a hand corer. Tiles are placed directly above the deposited pellets on the sediment surface. Pellet amounts are designed to elicit 1) baseline concentration, 2) boosted ion concentration to account for limestone sorptive capacity, and 3) very high ion concentrations to overcome all possible uptakes from limestone tile, marl soil, and soil biota, plus possible higher-than-expected ion release rate to ambient water from the source:

• Baseline:

o P target concentration of 10 ppb, or 0.01 mg (10 ug) P /L/day

 1.5 mg of slow-release P nutrient pellets deployed

o Salt target concentration of 1 ppt, or 1 g NaCl /L/day

 30 grams of rock salt pellets deployed

• Boosted:

o P target concentration of 20 ppb, or 0.02 mg (20 ug) P /L/day

 3 mg of slow-release P nutrient pellets deployed

o Salt target concentration of 5 ppt, or 5 g NaCl /L/day

 150 grams of rock salt pellets deployed

• Overkill:

o P target concentration of 40 ppb, or 0.04 mg (40 ug) P /L/day

 6 mg of slow-release P nutrient pellets deployed

o Salt target concentration of 10 ppt, or 10 g NaCl /L/day

 300 grams of rock salt pellets deployed

Pellet bed: Following the same target ion concentrations as above, slow-release P nutrient pellets and/or rock salt pellets are put in a fine plastic mesh bag and placed on the sediment interface. Tiles are placed directly on top of the pellet bed.

Soaked tile: Limestone tiles are soaked in a solution of each treatment type at ten times the desired release concentration (P = 0.1 mg/L, NaCl = 10 g/L), since it is expected that ion release via passive diffusion will release 90% of the ions in the first 3 days of deployment in non-solution water (Pringle and Bowers 1984, Rugenski et al. 2008). P solution is made from a dilution of 85% phosphoric acid (H3PO4), sensu (Servais et al. 2018). The salt solution is made using pure granulated sea salt, dissolved and diluted sensu (Mazzei et al. 2020). At high salt concentrations, solution should be heated on a hot plate to ensure complete crystal dissolution into solution. Tiles are soaked in each solution in plexiglass tubs for at least 1 week's time. Tiles are transported to the field in individual ziploc bags to prevent cross-contamination.

Special attention to P release will be paid to this method, due to concern that P may adsorb too tightly to the limestone and marl and release poorly, or, in S+P trial, will not adsorb to the tile enough to begin with due to the high concentration of salt ions (Flower et al. 2017, Flower et al. 2016).

• Baseline:

o P soaking concentration of 0.1 mg P /L/

o Salt soaking concentration of 1 ppt, or 10 g NaCl /L

• Boosted:

o 0.2 mg P / L soaking concentration

o 50 g NaCl / L soaking concentration (5 ppt)

• Overkill:

o 0.4 mg P / L soaking concentration

o 100 g NaCl / L soaking concentration (10 ppt)

Description:

Deployment:

Tiles are placed on the slow-release substrate bed or directly on the substrate, depending on the method chosen in Phase 1. If periphyton mats are already established at the point of tile deployment, that mat was removed to allow for novel periphyton establishment and growth on the tiles. Each treatment tile was placed 3 m from the others in its 4-tile treatment suite (S, P, S+P, C), and treatment suites were randomly distributed within the site. Tile locations and type specifics were marked with labeled flags. The natural condition of each site was recorded (a natural periphyton sample for composition and baseline P).

Description:

Collection:

Each two weeks after deployment, for eight weeks, a suite of treatment tiles of each method and concentration was retrieved. Periphyton from each tile is being processed and analyzed for community composition, AFDM, chl-a, and per-gram biomass P content using standard lab techniques. Each time tiles were retrieved, periphyton directly adjacent to each of the two distinct method types (soaked tile and pellet bed) was collected for a qualitative analysis of the representativeness of community composition on the control tiles in relation to the natural community, and to account for the degree of natural community succession over the course of the experiment. Additionally, to better understand how the treatments affect the local ambient water and porewater chemistry in a natural setting at the time of tile deployment and when each tile is collected, directly prior to tile collection the water directly adjacent to each tile was sampled for specific conductance via an Orion Star A222 conductivity portable meter. Data was recorded and analyzed for over-time trends in concentrations to determine release rates and concentration accuracy. The best-fit method type will be selected to be used in future work.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@environmentaldatainitiative.org
Web Address:
https://environmentaldatainitiative.org
Creators:
Individual: Thomas P Shannon
Organization:Florida International University
Position:Graduate Student
Address:
Miami, FL USA
Email Address:
tshan018@fiu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5446-093X
Individual: Evelyn E Gaiser
Organization:Florida International University
Position:Endowed George Barley Eminent Scholars Chair; Professor
Email Address:
gaisere@fiu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2065-4821
Contacts:
Individual: Thomas P Shannon
Organization:Florida International University
Position:Graduate Student
Address:
CASE 186B, 11200 SW 8th St,
Miami, FL 33199
Email Address:
tshan018@fiu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5446-093X
Metadata Providers:
Individual: Thomas P Shannon
Organization:Florida International University
Position:Graduate Student
Email Address:
tshan018@fiu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5446-093X

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2020-10-06
End:
2020-11-16
Sampling Site: 
Description:An ~5m section of marl prairie located appx. 75m N and E of the gated entrance to the L31-E Canal.
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): 80.411444Latitude (degree): 25.342972
Taxonomic Range:
Classification:
Rank Name:Class
Rank Value:bacillariophyceae

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Periphyton Functional and Species Composition following Simulated Saltwater and Phosphorus Groundwater Intrusions, in Southeastern FL Everglades
Personnel:
Individual: Thomas P` Shannon
Organization:Florida International University
Position:Graduate Student
Email Address:
tshan018@fiu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5446-093X
Role:Lead organizer, field worker, and lab analyst.

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:

All field samples are collected. Lab analysis of variables of interest is ongoing. Samples have been triaged by date to prioritize earliest weeks of treatment. If manipulation effects are detected, the other weeks will be processed as well. Dataset will be updated as analysis results are made available.

Frequency:
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'microSiemenPerCentimeter'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'microSiemenPerCentimeter'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'microgramsPerGramPeriphyton'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'microgramsPerGramPeriphyton'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'emlEditor'
        |     |        \___attribute 'app' = 'ezEML'
        |     |        \___attribute 'release' = '2021.02.23'
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo