Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Data for “Herbivory damage but not plant disease under experimental warming is dependent on weather for three subalpine grass species”, Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Gothic, Colorado, 2015-2017.

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:edi.978.2
Title:Data for “Herbivory damage but not plant disease under experimental warming is dependent on weather for three subalpine grass species”, Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Gothic, Colorado, 2015-2017.
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

Both theory and prior studies predict that climate warming should increase attack rates by herbivores and pathogens on plants. However, past work has often assumed that variation in abiotic conditions other than temperature (e.g., precipitation) do not alter warming responses of plant damage by natural enemies. Studies over short time periods span low variation in weather, and studies over long-time scales often neglect to account for fine-scale weather conditions. Here, we used a 20+ year field warming experiment to investigate if warming affects herbivory and disease are dependent on variation in ambient weather observed over three years. We studied three common grass species in a subalpine meadow in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. We visually estimated herbivory and disease every two-weeks during the growing season and evaluated weather conditions during the previous two- or four-week time interval (two-week average air temperature, two- and four-week cumulative precipitation) as predictors of the probability and amount of damage. Herbivore attack was 13% more likely and amount of damage was 29% greater in warmed plots than controls across the focal species, but warming treatment had little affect on plant disease. Herbivory presence and damage increased the most with experimental warming when preceded by wetter, rather than drier, fine-scale weather, but preceding ambient temperature did not strongly interact with elevated warming to influence herbivory. Disease presence and damage increased, on average, with warmer weather and more precipitation regardless of warming. The effect of warming over reference climate on herbivore damage is dependent on and amplified by fine-scale weather variation, suggesting more boom-and-bust damage dynamics with increasing climate variability. However, the mean effect of regional climate change is likely reduced monsoon rainfall, for which we predict a reduction in insect herbivore damage. Plant disease was generally unrelated to warming or weather, which may be a consequence of our coarse disease estimates that did not track specific pathogen species or guilds. The results point towards temperature as an important but not sufficient determinant and regulator of species interactions, where precipitation and other constraints may determine the effect of warming.

Publication Date:2022-11-16
For more information:
Visit: DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period
Begin:
2015-05-01
End:
2017-09-01

People and Organizations
Contact:Lynn, Joshua S.  (The University of Manchester, Lecturer in Global Change Ecology) [  email ]
Creator:Lynn, Joshua S.  (The University of Manchester, Lecturer in Global Change Ecology)
Creator:Abo-Sido, Nisreen (Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, REU student)
Creator:McCowen, Ian W. (Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, REU student)
Creator:Villanueva, Shermila B. (Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, REU student)
Creator:Harte, John (University of California Berkeley, Professor)
Creator:Rudgers, Jennifer A. (The University of New Mexico, Professor)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
HPdataset_LynnETAL
Description:
Data set for accepted pending revisions paper at Journal of Ecology by Lynn et al.
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/edi/978/2/87612874388b47e9d2e2969ecd07d8a2
Name:HPdataset_LynnETAL
Description:Data set for accepted pending revisions paper at Journal of Ecology by Lynn et al.
Number of Records:8459
Number of Columns:19

Table Structure
Object Name:HPdataset_LynnETAL.csv
Size:831960 byte
Authentication:c82a6dd49f4093a91286088a544c418a Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 dateyeardaysplotspeciestagcolorindividualtotalHdamaveHdamtotalDdamaveDdamper_HdamHdam_typeper_DdamDdam_typeWorCtavgsumprecipsumprecip_month
Column Name:date  
year  
days  
plot  
species  
tagcolor  
individual  
totalHdam  
aveHdam  
totalDdam  
aveDdam  
per_Hdam  
Hdam_type  
per_Ddam  
Ddam_type  
WorC  
tavg  
sumprecip  
sumprecip_month  
Definition:Date of observationYear of ObservationNumber of days since first sampling for a yearName designation for plot replication (10 replicates)Labels for one of three focal speciesReports the colors of a tag associated with a leaf tracked through the season for damage estimates Unique individual of a species observed per plotTotal percent amount of damage by herbivores to a leaf across types of damageAverage percent amount of leaf damage by herbivores per individual for a given dateTotal percent amount of damage by pathogens to a leaf across types of disease damageAverage percent amount of disease leaf damage by pathogens per individual for a given datePercent herbivore damage amount on a leaf broken down by damage type Type of herbivory damage for the “per_Hdam” columnPercent pathogen disease damage amount on a leaf broken down by damage typeType of pathogen disease damage for the “per_Ddam” columnFactor for the whether the plot treatment was warming or control Average temperature of the prior 14 days to sampling dateSummed precipitation of the prior 14 days to sampling dateSummed precipitation of the prior 28 days to sampling date
Storage Type:dateTime  
dateTime  
float  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
float  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:dateTimedateTimerationominalnominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratiorationominalrationominalnominalratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
FormatYYYY
Precision
Unitday
Typeinteger
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1
Definitionplot 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definitionplot 2
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definitionplot 3
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definitionplot 4
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definitionplot 5
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definitionplot 6
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definitionplot 7
Source
Code Definition
Code8
Definitionplot 8
Source
Code Definition
Code9
Definitionplot 9
Source
Code Definition
Code10
Definitionplot 10
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeACLE
DefinitionAchnatherum lettermanii
Source
Code Definition
CodeFETH
DefinitionFestuca thurberi
Source
Code Definition
CodePOPR
DefinitionPoa pratensis
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeblack
Definitioncolor label
Source
Code Definition
Codegreen
Definitioncolor label
Source
Code Definition
Codegreen/white
Definitioncolor label
Source
Code Definition
Codeorange/black
Definitioncolor label
Source
Code Definition
Codered
Definitioncolor label
Source
Code Definition
Codered/black
Definitioncolor label
Source
Code Definition
Codewhite
Definitioncolor label
Source
Code Definition
Codeyellow
Definitioncolor label
Source
Code Definition
Codeyellow/blue
Definitioncolor label
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6
Source
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeaphid
Definitionleaf damage by aphids, leaf hoppers, etc.
Source
Code Definition
Codechew
Definitionleaf damage by chewing insects; e.g., caterpillar, grasshopper
Source
Code Definition
Codemine
Definitionleaf damage by mining insects; e.g., flies, moths
Source
Unitpercent
Typereal
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codeblack
Definitionbulbous black pocks
Source
Code Definition
Codebrown
Definitionbrown, oozy lesions
Source
Code Definition
Codemildew
Definitionwhite powdery damage
Source
Code Definition
Coderust
Definitionreddish-colored dusty damage
Source
Code Definition
Codeyellow
Definitionyellowy discolored lesions
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeC
Definitioncontrol plot
Source
Code Definition
CodeW
Definitionwarmed plot
Source
Unitcelsius
Typereal
Unitmillimeter
Typereal
Unitmillimeter
Typereal
Missing Value Code:              
CodeNA
Explno observation
CodeNA
Explno observation
CodeNA
Explno observation
CodeNA
Explno observation
CodeNA
Explno observation
CodeNA
Explno observation
CodeNA
Explno observation
CodeNA
Explno observation
       
Accuracy Report:                                      
Accuracy Assessment:                                      
Coverage:                                      
Methods:                                      

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
LTER Controlled Vocabularyplants, herbivory, disease, warming, climate change, weather, grasses, meadows
(No thesaurus)experiment, natural enemies, repeated sampling, Poaceae, infrared heating, pathogen

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Full methodological details can be found in Lynn et al. (accepted) Journal of Ecology)

Warming experiment

In the fall of 1990 at the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (RMBL) in Gothic, CO, USA, ten permanent 10 x 3m plots were established oriented lengthwise along the ridge of a moraine. Five treatment plots were warmed year-round by overhead electric heaters (~22 W/m2 infrared radiation). The treatment warmed the soil surface (top 15cm) by ~2°C, dried the soil by ~10-20% gravimetric, and increased growing season by ~12 days through warming effects on snowmelt (Harte et al., 1995; Harte & Shaw, 1995; Saleska et al., 2002). Treatments were designed to reflect a warming scenario of doubled atmospheric CO2 based on conditions at the onset of the experiment (Harte & Shaw, 1995). Control plots without mock-heaters were alternated between warmed plots. Each plot was split into three blocks from top to bottom of the ridge, and warming effects on the abiotic environment were greatest in the top (driest) block, where we concentrated our sampling effort. Additional detail on experiment design and upkeep can be found in Harte et al., 2015, Harte & Shaw, 1995, and Rudgers et al., 2014. Other effects of long-term experimental warming included declines in soil carbon (Harte et al., 2015), increased dominance of the shrub sagebrush (Perfors et al., 2003), and increased representation of sedges over grasses without much change in total graminoid cover (Rudgers et al., 2014). On average across plots and years of this study (2015-2017), warmed plots melted out 38 days before the control plots (Julian day of 86 versus 124).

Focal plant species

We studied three dominant perennial grasses (Poaceae): Achnatherum lettermanii, Festuca thurberi, and Poa pratensis. Both A. lettermanii and F. thurberi are bunchgrasses, while P. pratensis is rhizomatous. Prior work on herbivory in the warming meadow had not included grasses (Roy et al., 2004), leaving a large portion of the plant community unstudied. Poa pratensis has significantly declined in the warmed plots compared to controls, and both A. lettermanii and F. thurberi trended towards declines in warmed plots (Rudgers et al., 2014). We focused on herbivore and disease damage to these three most common grass species to gain further insight into a potential indirect mechanism of their decline in response to warming.

Herbivory and disease measurements

In the beginning of each growing season (early to mid-June, depending on snowmelt), we used plastic zip ties to mark three randomly chosen individual tillers on each of six individuals per species per plot. Six individuals per species per the 3 X 3m upper zone made up between 60-100% of individuals of the focal species in the plots, anecdotally. This enabled us to track accumulation of damage on tillers throughout the growing season. If zip ties fell off the tillers, we randomly selected another tiller to track (~5% of observations). We sampled individuals at the top of the ridge in the first block, but for F. thurberi, we could not find the desired six individuals per plant species in plots 7-10. In this case we included individuals in the lower blocks until the desired number was achieved (see Figure S1 and S2 - no differences in the plots where this occurred).

Herbivory and, likely pathogen caused, disease damage were visually estimated by an observer, to the nearest 1% of leaf area damaged. Visual estimates of percentage damage were calibrated between two observers (one student and one expert – J.S. Lynn) by consensus. After one to two days of training, one-student observer carried out the rest of the observations for the season. In total, four observers recorded herbivory (N. Abo-Sido - 2015, I. McCowen -2016, S. Villanueva -2017, and J.S. Lynn -across years). These and similar methods of plant-enemy damage estimation are standard practice for the field (e.g., protocols from herbvar.org; Baskett & Schemske, 2018; Roy et al., 2004). Each grass tiller contained two-three leaves. Additionally, we noted the type of damage among the following classes: cell sucking damage (aphids, leaf hoppers, etc.), chewing damage (caterpillar, grasshopper), or leaf-miner damage (flies, moths). Disease was classified by symptom rather than species due to lack of funds for sequencing. We used the following classes with descriptions: powdery mildew (white powdery damage), rust (reddish-colored dusty damage), black (bulbous black pocks), brown (brown, oozy lesions), or yellow (yellowy discolored lesions) disease. We only counted disease if we could identify pathogen caused disease symptoms (e.g., spores, hyphae, molds, ooze) and no other factors (e.g., discoloration from abiotic stress or mechanical damage).

Climate data and manipulation

We used climate data from the National Atmospheric Deposition Program (http://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/siteOps/ppt/default.aspx) at the CO-10 site ID, which was approximately 50 m from the warming meadow. We investigated how fine-scale weather patterns correlated to the presence and amount of damage. We focused on temperature (°C) and precipitation (mm) as the key climatic variables. We calculated average daily temperature as the midpoint between daily minimum and maximum temperatures. Then, because we observed damage every two weeks, we averaged daily temperature values over the two weeks prior to each sampling date to obtain average conditions leading up to sampling. We summed the amount of precipitation over the two- and four-weeks prior to sampling. The two-week weather windows were chosen to cover weather variation between samplings. The four-week precipitation window was added because of the long “moisture memory” of the soil in the experiment (takes ~ four-weeks of no precipitation to reach below plant wilting point; Harte et al., 1995).

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@edirepository.org
Web Address:
https://edirepository.org
Id:https://ror.org/0330j0z60
Creators:
Individual: Joshua S. Lynn
Organization:The University of Manchester
Position:Lecturer in Global Change Ecology
Email Address:
joshua.lynn@manchester.ac.uk
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7190-7991
Individual: Nisreen Abo-Sido
Organization:Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
Position:REU student
Individual: Ian W. McCowen
Organization:Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
Position:REU student
Individual: Shermila B. Villanueva
Organization:Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory
Position:REU student
Individual: John Harte
Organization:University of California Berkeley
Position:Professor
Email Address:
jharte@berkeley.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-5140
Individual: Jennifer A. Rudgers
Organization:The University of New Mexico
Position:Professor
Email Address:
jrudgers@unm.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7094-4857
Contacts:
Individual: Joshua S. Lynn
Organization:The University of Manchester
Position:Lecturer in Global Change Ecology
Email Address:
joshua.lynn@manchester.ac.uk
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7190-7991
Metadata Providers:
Individual: Joshua S. Lynn
Organization:The University of Manchester
Position:Lecturer in Global Change Ecology
Email Address:
joshua.lynn@manchester.ac.uk
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7190-7991

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2015-05-01
End:
2017-09-01
Sampling Site: 
Description:Warming meadow associated with the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory, Gothic, Colorado, USA.
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -106.983Latitude (degree): 38.95
Altitude (meter):2920.0
Taxonomic Range:
Classification:
Rank Name:Kingdom
Rank Value:Plantae
Common Name:plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 202422
Classification:
Rank Name:Subkingdom
Rank Value:Viridiplantae
Common Name:green plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 954898
Classification:
Rank Name:Infrakingdom
Rank Value:Streptophyta
Common Name:land plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846494
Classification:
Rank Name:Division
Rank Value:Tracheophyta
Common Name:vascular plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846496
Classification:
Rank Name:Subdivision
Rank Value:Spermatophytina
Common Name:spermatophytes
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846504
Classification:
Rank Name:Class
Rank Value:Magnoliopsida
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 18063
Classification:
Rank Name:Superorder
Rank Value:Lilianae
Common Name:monocots
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846542
Classification:
Rank Name:Order
Rank Value:Poales
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846620
Classification:
Rank Name:Family
Rank Value:Poaceae
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 40351
Classification:
Rank Name:Genus
Rank Value:Festuca
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 40792
Classification:
Rank Name:Species
Rank Value:Festuca thurberi
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 40828
Taxonomic Range:
Classification:
Rank Name:Kingdom
Rank Value:Plantae
Common Name:plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 202422
Classification:
Rank Name:Subkingdom
Rank Value:Viridiplantae
Common Name:green plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 954898
Classification:
Rank Name:Infrakingdom
Rank Value:Streptophyta
Common Name:land plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846494
Classification:
Rank Name:Division
Rank Value:Tracheophyta
Common Name:vascular plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846496
Classification:
Rank Name:Subdivision
Rank Value:Spermatophytina
Common Name:spermatophytes
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846504
Classification:
Rank Name:Class
Rank Value:Magnoliopsida
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 18063
Classification:
Rank Name:Superorder
Rank Value:Lilianae
Common Name:monocots
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846542
Classification:
Rank Name:Order
Rank Value:Poales
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846620
Classification:
Rank Name:Family
Rank Value:Poaceae
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 40351
Classification:
Rank Name:Genus
Rank Value:Achnatherum
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 500933
Classification:
Rank Name:Species
Rank Value:Achnatherum lettermanii
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 507946
Taxonomic Range:
Classification:
Rank Name:Kingdom
Rank Value:Plantae
Common Name:plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 202422
Classification:
Rank Name:Subkingdom
Rank Value:Viridiplantae
Common Name:green plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 954898
Classification:
Rank Name:Infrakingdom
Rank Value:Streptophyta
Common Name:land plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846494
Classification:
Rank Name:Division
Rank Value:Tracheophyta
Common Name:vascular plants
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846496
Classification:
Rank Name:Subdivision
Rank Value:Spermatophytina
Common Name:spermatophytes
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846504
Classification:
Rank Name:Class
Rank Value:Magnoliopsida
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 18063
Classification:
Rank Name:Superorder
Rank Value:Lilianae
Common Name:monocots
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846542
Classification:
Rank Name:Order
Rank Value:Poales
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 846620
Classification:
Rank Name:Family
Rank Value:Poaceae
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 40351
Classification:
Rank Name:Genus
Rank Value:Poa
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 41074
Classification:
Rank Name:Species
Rank Value:Poa pratensis
Identifer:https://www.itis.gov
ID: 41088

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Herbivory damage but not plant disease under experimental warming is dependent on weather for three subalpine grass species
Personnel:
Individual: Joshua S. Lynn
Organization:The University of Manchester
Position:Lecturer in Global Change Ecology
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7190-7991
Role:Project leader and organizer
Abstract:

Both theory and prior studies predict that climate warming should increase attack rates by herbivores and pathogens on plants. However, past work has often assumed that variation in abiotic conditions other than temperature (e.g., precipitation) do not alter warming responses of plant damage by natural enemies. Studies over short time periods span low variation in weather, and studies over long-time scales often neglect to account for fine-scale weather conditions. Here, we used a 20+ year field warming experiment to investigate whether warming affects herbivory and disease depend on variation in ambient weather observed over three years. We studied three common grass species in a subalpine meadow in the Colorado Rocky Mountains, USA. We visually estimated herbivory and disease every two weeks during the growing season and evaluated weather conditions during the previous two- or four-week time interval (two-week average air temperature, two- and four-week cumulative precipitation) as predictors of the probability and amount of damage. Herbivore attack was 13% more likely and amount of damage was 29% greater in warmed plots than controls across the focal species, but warming treatment had little affect on plant disease. Herbivory presence and damage increased the most with experimental warming when preceded by wetter, rather than drier, fine-scale weather, but preceding ambient temperature did not strongly interact with elevated warming to influence herbivory. Disease presence and damage increased, on average, with warmer weather and more precipitation regardless of warming. The effect of warming over reference climate on herbivore damage is dependent on and amplified by fine-scale weather variation, suggesting more boom-and-bust damage dynamics with increasing climate variability. However, the mean effect of regional climate change is likely reduced monsoon rainfall, for which we predict a reduction in insect herbivore damage. Plant disease was generally unrelated to warming or weather, which may be a consequence of our coarse disease estimates that did not track specific pathogen species or guilds. The results point towards temperature as an important but not sufficient determinant and regulator of species interactions, where precipitation and other constraints may determine the effect of warming.

Funding:

NSF DBI-1262713; NSF DEB-1701221; NSF DEB-1254972

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:

This dataset is associated with a publication and will be updated as required.

Frequency:asNeeded
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'importedFromXML'
        |     |        \___attribute 'dateImported' = '2022-06-21'
        |     |        \___attribute 'filename' = 'CAP_template.xml'
        |     |        \___attribute 'taxonomicCoverageExempt' = 'True'
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'day'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'day'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text '24 hour period'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'emlEditor'
        |     |        \___attribute 'app' = 'ezEML'
        |     |        \___attribute 'release' = '2022.11.14'
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo