Data Package Metadata   View Summary

White oak and red maple foliar chemistry of urban and reference forests of the eastern US

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:knb-lter-bes.5007.2
Title:White oak and red maple foliar chemistry of urban and reference forests of the eastern US
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

Foliar chemistry values were obtained from two important native tree species (white oak (Quercus alba L.) and red maple (Acer rubrum L.)) across urban and reference forest sites of three major cities in the eastern United States during summer 2015 (New York, NY (NYC); Philadelphia, PA; and Baltimore, MD). Trees were selected from secondary growth oak-hickory forests found in New York, NY; Philadelphia, PA; and Baltimore, MD, as well as at reference forest sites outside each metropolitan area. In all three metropolitan areas, urban forest patches and references forest sites were selected based on the presence of red maple and white oak canopy dominant trees in patches of at least 1.5 hectares with slopes less than 25%, and well-drained soils of similar soil series within each metropolitan area. Within each city, several forest patches were selected to capture the variation in forest patch site conditions across an individual city. All reference sites were located in protected areas outside of the city and within intermix wildland-urban interface landscapes, in order to target similar contexts of surrounding land use and population density (Martinuzzi et al. 2015). Several reference sites were selected for each city, located within the same protected area considered representative of rural forests of the region. White oaks were at least 38.1 cm diameter at breast height (DBH), red maples were at least 25.4 cm DBH, and all trees were dominant or co-dominant canopy trees. The trees had no major trunk cavities and had crown vigor scores of 1 or 2 (less than 25% overall canopy damage; Pontius & Hallett 2014). From early July to early August 2015, sun leaves were collected from the periphery of the crown of each tree with either a shotgun or slingshot for subsequent analysis to determine differences in foliar chemistry across cities and urban vs. reference forest site types. The data were used to invstigate whether differences in native tree physiology occur between urban and reference forest patches, and whether those differences are site- and species-specific.

Publication Date:2020-05-30

Time Period
Begin:
2015-07-01
End:
2015-08-15

People and Organizations
Contact:Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies [  email ]
Creator:Sonti, Nancy F (USDA Forest Service)
Creator:Hallett, Richard A. (USDA Forest Service)
Creator:Griffin, Kevin L. (Columbia University)
Creator:Sullivan, Joe H. (University of Maryland)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
Urban foliar chemistry data table
Description:
Urban foliar chemistry
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-bes/5007/2/2e5643a8f84c0755e66340e29494c1e6
Name:Urban foliar chemistry data table
Description:Urban foliar chemistry
Number of Records:180
Number of Columns:15

Table Structure
Object Name:Urban_FoliarChemistry.csv
Size:27905 bytes
Authentication:2b5fa18b890e8ceb491a86eecc3423c2 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Tree_ID  
Species  
Site  
SiteType  
City  
N  
Al  
K  
Ca  
Mg  
Mn  
Na  
P  
Pb  
S  
Definition:Tree_IDUSDA Plants codeSiteSite TypeCityNAlKCaMgMnNaPPbS
Storage Type:string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:nominalnominalnominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
DefinitionTree_ID
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeACRU
DefinitionAcer rubrum L.; red maple
Source
Code Definition
CodeQUAL
DefinitionQuercus alba L.; white oak
Source
DefinitionSite
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeReference
DefinitionReference
Source
Code Definition
CodeUrban
DefinitionUrban
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeNew York City
DefinitionNew York City, NY
Source
Code Definition
CodePhiladelphia
DefinitionPhiladelphia, PA
Source
Code Definition
CodeBaltimore
DefinitionBaltimore, MD
Source
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min0.005810252 
Max0.034726271 
UnitpartPerMillion
Typereal
Min1.764780378 
Max60.26952899 
UnitpartPerMillion
Typereal
Min3920.730247 
Max15701.59694 
UnitpartPerMillion
Typereal
Min2770.82656 
Max14943.49125 
UnitpartPerMillion
Typereal
Min574.7977169 
Max3134.720428 
UnitpartPerMillion
Typereal
Min20.9685182 
Max2683.273153 
UnitpartPerMillion
Typereal
Min1.250324534 
Max76.377684 
UnitpartPerMillion
Typereal
Min770.1410715 
Max2130.529932 
UnitpartPerMillion
Typereal
Min
Max5.94499127 
UnitpartPerMillion
Typereal
Min723 
Max2961.5 
Missing Value Code:                              
Accuracy Report:                              
Accuracy Assessment:                              
Coverage:                              
Methods:                              

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data (\"Data User\" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available \"as is.\" The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
LTER Controlled Vocabularychemistry, foliage, nitrogen, aluminum, potassium, calcium, microbial biomass, magnesium, manganese, phosphorus, lead, sulfur
BES VocabularyBaltimore, MD, Philadelphia, PA, New York City, NY, Maryland
(No thesaurus)Pennsylvania, New York

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Three leaves from each tree were pressed and dried immediately after collection. Oven-dried foliage was ground to create a composite sample for each tree and was subsequently digested using a microwave-assisted acid digestion procedure (USEPA Method 3052) and analyzed for Al, Ca, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Pb, S, and P by ICP spectroscopy. Foliar N was determined by combustion with a PerkinElmer 2400 series II CHNS/O analyzer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA).

People and Organizations

Creators:
Individual: Nancy F Sonti
Organization:USDA Forest Service
Email Address:
nancy.f.sonti@usda.gov
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-8124
Individual: Richard A. Hallett
Organization:USDA Forest Service
Email Address:
richard.hallett@usda.gov
Individual: Kevin L. Griffin
Organization:Columbia University
Email Address:
griff@ldeo.columbia.edu
Individual: Joe H. Sullivan
Organization:University of Maryland
Email Address:
jsull@umd.edu
Contacts:
Organization:Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Email Address:
besim@caryinstitute.org

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2015-07-01
End:
2015-08-15
Geographic Region:
Description:Baltimore County
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  39.722Southern:  39.19
Western:  -76.93Eastern:  -76.33

Project

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:complete
Frequency:
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'partPerMillion'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'partPerMillion'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = ''
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = ''
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'ratio of two quantities as parts per million (1:1000000)'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'percent'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'percent'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = ''
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = ''
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'percent'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo