Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Baltimore Ecosystem Study: Lawn productivity 2006-2007

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:knb-lter-bes.5016.2
Title:Baltimore Ecosystem Study: Lawn productivity 2006-2007
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

Urban grasslands cover large land areas in human-dominated landscapes, but little is known about how these landscapes cycle carbon (C). In this study, we examine turfgrass biomass and productivity at thirty-three urban grassland sites within the Gwynns Fall watershed (Baltimore, MD). These sites are characteristic of residential conditions in the region and were selected to provide contrasts in urban ecosystem structure (density of coarse vegetation and built structures) as well as historical (pre-development) land use. Aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) was measured as the sum of clipping production plus stubble, thatch, and moss production. This work provides context for understanding the impact of urban expansion on regional ecosystem C dynamics and identifies specific needs related to standardized methods for measuring turfgrass ANPP in urban grassland systems.

Publication Date:2021-09-23

Time Period
Begin:
2006-04-01
End:
2007-08-31

People and Organizations
Contact:Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies [  email ]
Creator:Jenkins, Jennifer (University of Vermont)
Creator:Groffman, Peter M (City University of New York)
Creator:Sonti, Nancy F (USDA Forest Service)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
BaltimoreLawnProductivity
Description:
Baltimore lawn productivity data
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-bes/5016/2/810ed3f45ac21eac780f84dbe08ce83a
Name:BaltimoreLawnProductivity
Description:Baltimore lawn productivity data
Number of Records:33
Number of Columns:39

Table Structure
Object Name:BaltimoreLawnProductivity.csv
Size:9654 bytes
Authentication:0c25009e3b9e8acc29e9c4a125a64dbf Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:LUHist  
Age  
Cluster  
Site_id  
BD_aver_gpercm3_0-10cm  
BD_aver_gpercm3_10-30cm  
Soil C Density_KgC_m2_to 10cm  
Soil C Density_KgC_m2_to 30cm  
Aver_N%_0-10cm  
Aver_C%_0-10cm  
CNratio_0-10cm  
Aver_N%_10-30cm  
Aver_C%_10-30cm  
CNratio_10-30cm  
Pct_Sand_0-10cm  
Pct_Silt_Clay_0-10cm  
Pct_Silt_Clay_10-30cm  
Fertilize_lawn  
Water_lawn  
Observed ht_fieldnotes  
Respir05_gC_m2_yr  
Respir06_gC_m2_yr  
Respir07_gC_m2_yr  
2005_annual_mean_soil_temp_5cm  
2006_annual_mean_soil_temp_5cm  
2007_annual_mean_soil_temp_5cm  
2005_Percent_annual_mean_soil_moisture  
2006_Percent_annual_mean_soil_moisture  
2007_Percent_annual_mean_soil_moisture  
Pct_N_Clip_2006  
Pct_C_clip_2006  
Cnratio_2006  
Pct_N_Clip_2007  
Pct_C_clip_2007  
Cnratio_2007  
2006_TotClipping_gCperm2  
2006_ANPP  
2007_TotClipping_gCperm2  
2007_ANPP  
Definition:Land use history (formerly agriculture or forest)Year house was builtHousing cluster IDUnique site IDBulk density (avg grams per cm3 at 0-10 cm depth)Bulk density (avg grams per cm3 at 10-30 cm depth)Soil carbon density (kg carbon per m2 in top 10 cm)Soil carbon density (kg carbon per m2 in top 30 cm)Soil % nitrogen at 0-10 cm depthSoil % carbon at 0-10 cm depthSoil C:N at 0-10 cm depthSoil % nitrogen at 10-30 cm depthSoil % carbon at 10-30 cm depthSoil C:N at 10-30 cm depth% sand in soil at 0-10 cm depth% silt and clay at 0-10 cm depth% silt and clay at 10-30 cm depthIs lawn fertilized? Yes = 1, No = 0Is lawn watered? Yes = 1, No = 0Lawn height (cm)2005 soil respiration (g carbon per m2 per year)2006 soil respiration (g carbon per m2 per year)2007 soil respiration (g carbon per m2 per year)2005 annual mean soil temperature at 5 cm depth2006 annual mean soil temperature at 5 cm depth2007 annual mean soil temperature at 5 cm depth2005 percent annual mean soil moisture2006 percent annual mean soil moisture2007 percent annual mean soil moisture2006 % nitrogen in grass clippings2006 % carbon in grass clippings2006 C:N in grass clippings2007 % nitrogen in grass clippings2007 % carbon in grass clippings2007 C:N in grass clippings2006 total grass clippings (g carbon per m2)2006 aboveground net primary productivity2007 total grass clippings (g carbon per m2)2007 aboveground net primary productivity
Storage Type:string  
date  
float  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:nominaldateTimerationominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratiorationominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeAg
DefinitionAgricultural
Source
Code Definition
CodeForest
DefinitionForest
Source
FormatYYYY
Precision
Unitnumber
Typenatural
Min
Max10 
DefinitionUnique site ID
UnitgramPerCentimeterCubed
Typereal
Min0.6315 
Max1.0599 
UnitgramPerCentimeterCubed
Typereal
Min0.8595 
Max1.2843 
UnitkilogramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
Min1.2937 
Max4.4216 
UnitkilogramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
Min2.557 
Max9.0624 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min0.1103 
Max0.2778 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min1.2504 
Max4.8994 
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
Min10.083 
Max31.3329 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min0.032 
Max0.1088 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min0.3364 
Max2.753 
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
Min5.3863 
Max29.663 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min24.781 
Max52.5119 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min47.4881 
Max75.219 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min33.1086 
Max81.4055 
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definitionno
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definitionyes
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definitionno
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definitionyes
Source
DefinitionLawn height (cm)
UnitgramPerMeterSquaredPerYear
Typereal
Min705.422 
Max2915.37 
UnitgramPerMeterSquaredPerYear
Typereal
Min713.586 
Max3207.13 
UnitgramPerMeterSquaredPerYear
Typereal
Min747.962 
Max2885.59 
Unitcelsius
Typereal
Min9.6564 
Max13.9904 
Unitcelsius
Typereal
Min10.187 
Max14.5719 
Unitcelsius
Typereal
Min10.4719 
Max14.884 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min21.6155 
Max31.6258 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min23.3172 
Max32.7503 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min19.6625 
Max30.7036 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min2.7135 
Max5.126 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min42.0387 
Max47.1689 
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
Min9.0972 
Max17.355 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min2.6546 
Max4.7166 
Unitpercent
Typereal
Min44.1025 
Max47.4674 
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
Min9.449 
Max17.3181 
UnitgramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
Min8.9004 
Max361.155 
UnitgramPerMeterSquaredPerYear
Typereal
Min55.0198 
Max574.856 
UnitgramPerMeterSquared
Typereal
Min
Max200.174 
UnitgramPerMeterSquaredPerYear
Typereal
Min35.2302 
Max536.71 
Missing Value Code:        
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
CodeNA
Explno data available
Accuracy Report:                                                                              
Accuracy Assessment:                                                                              
Coverage:                                                                              
Methods:                                                                              

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
LTER Core Research Areainorganic nutrients, organic matter, primary production, disturbance patterns
BES VocabularyBaltimore, MD, Maryland, Baltimore Ecosystem Study, BES, LTER, residential land
LTER Controlled Vocabularyurban, vegetation, soil
National Research & Development TaxonomyEcology, Ecosystems, & Environment, Environment and People , Urban natural resources management
ISO 19115 Topic Categorybiota, environment

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Study Design

Sites were selected to represent the range of conditions found in the region. Site selection was based on four stratifying elements hypothesized to impact productivity: housing age, prior land use (i.e. the land use immediately prior to residential development), coarse vegetation density and built structure density.

Turfgrass ANPP

The parcels selected for sampling ranged in size from 0.19 acres to 4.0 acres, with turfgrass covering varying proportions of the parcel. At a random location within each parcel covered with turfgrass, a 0.5 x 0.5 m square microplot was established for sampling turfgrass production. To estimate aboveground annual production on the turfgrass plots, we quantified clippings, as well as stubble, thatch, and moss production over a full growing season (April 1-November 15).

Clippings. The grass microplots were clipped by hand once weekly or biweekly during the growing season, and clippings were collected using a portable vacuum cleaner (Falk 1980). In order to replicate as closely as possible the conditions on residential plots in situ, plots were clipped to the average height of the rest of the homeowner’s lawn during each mowing event. Mowing height thus varied from parcel to parcel, with an average height of 8.4 cm (minimum 4.5 cm and maximum 15.0 cm). Clippings were dried for 48 hours at 75oC and weighed. A small subsample (roughly 0.1 g) of the clippings was taken from each weekly clipping collection and composited together into one site-specific sample for each parcel in each collection year. This composited clipping sample was dried and ground in a Wiley mill to pass a 40 mesh screen and analyzed for C and N content (Carlo-Erba CN analyzer).

Thatch and stubble biomass. Thatch and stubble biomass were found using a sequential coring technique (Falk 1976, Falk 1980). At 2-month intervals during the growing season (April, June, August, October), three cores (5-cm by 10-cm deep) were collected from randomly-located sites on locations within the parcel covered with turfgrass. For each core, the live and dead organic matter in the thatch and stubble components were sorted, dried, and weighed.

Moss biomass. Moss percent cover was recorded for each of the sequential cores, and moss biomass was dried and weighed.

Total ANPP. Total turfgrass production was calculated annually as the sum of live + dead production as described by Falk (1976, 1980) and Qian et al. (2003). Using this approach:

ANPP = Annual clipping production + (maximum stubble biomass * stubble turnover rate) + (maximum thatch biomass * thatch turnover rate) + (maximum moss biomass * moss turnover rate). Turnover rate = (maximum biomass – minimum biomass)/ maximum biomass (Equation 2).

The dry weight of the clippings and stubble were converted to g C by multiplying by 45.85%, the mean %C from the composite clipping samples described above. Thatch was converted to g C by multiplying thatch biomass by 57.35%. This value is based the average %C of the clippings, adjusted for the higher lignin content in the thatch compared to the shoots (Qian et al. 2003). %C of 43% was used to convert moss biomass to g C (Vingani et al. 2004).

Soil respiration

Permanent chamber bases (10 cm diameter, 2 per plot) were established within each turfgrass microplot. At each weekly site visit, soil respiration rates were measured in situ using a Li-Cor 8100 Automated Soil CO2 Flux System. Soil temperature (at 0 cm, 5 cm, and 10 cm depths) and moisture measurements were also taken weekly. Grass was not clipped within the respiration chamber collars: as a result, the measured CO2 flux is a combination of the belowground heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration, as well as the dark respiration of the turfgrass. A correction factor was used to subtract the dark respiration of the turfgrass inside the soil respiration collars. The corrected soil respiration value is thus a measure of soil and root respiration only. To develop annual estimates of soil respiration, a statistical model was developed for each study parcel, relating soil temperature at 5 cm depth to instantaneous soil respiration. This model was then used together with daily estimates of soil temperature to aggregate an annual soil respiration value for each of the study parcels in each measurement year.

Soil physical/chemical properties

Cores were sorted to remove coarse roots and rocks (> 2 mm). The roots and rocks were dried at 105C, weighed and set aside. Rock volume was determined by mass and an assumed density of 2.7 g/cm3. Subsamples of homogenized soil from each depth interval were analyzed for soil dry weight and percent moisture (48 hrs at 105 oC). Bulk density (BD) was calculated as BD = (Total Dry Mass - Rock Mass) / (Total Volume - Rock Volume). Soil texture was obtained by the hydrometer method (Gee and Bauder 1986). Total C and N were obtained by flash-combustion / oxidation using a Thermo Finnigan Flash EA 1112 elemental analyzer (0.06% C and 0.01% N detection limits). For all data, the density of C in a unit area (1 m2) was calculated as C = CfBD(1-d2mm)V, where C is carbon density, d2mm is the fraction of material larger than 2 mm diameter, BD is bulk density, Cf is the fraction by mass of organic C, and V is the volume of the soil core (Post et al. 1982).

Lawn management

A survey asking homeowners to describe their lawn care practices was administered in 2007. Results from the survey were used to confirm that the homeowners had used standard lawn management practices.

References

Falk, J.H. 1976 Energetics of a suburban lawn ecosystem Ecology 57 141 150

Falk, J.H. 1980 The primary productivity of lawns in an urban environment J. Appl. Ecol. 17 689 696

Gee, G. W. and J. W. Bauder. 1986. Particle size analysis. Pages 383-411 in A. Klute, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, Second Edition. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

Qian YL, Bandaranayake W, Parton WJ, Mecham B, Harivandi MA, Mosier AR. 2003. Long‐term effects of clipping and nitrogen management in turfgrass on soil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics: The CENTURY model simulation. Journal of Environmental Quality. 32(5):1694-700.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@environmentaldatainitiative.org
Web Address:
https://environmentaldatainitiative.org
Creators:
Individual: Jennifer Jenkins
Organization:University of Vermont
Individual: Peter M Groffman
Organization:City University of New York
Email Address:
pgroffman@gc.cuny.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-6255
Individual: Nancy F Sonti
Organization:USDA Forest Service
Email Address:
nancy.f.sonti@usda.gov
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8581-8124
Contacts:
Organization:Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Email Address:
besim@caryinstitute.org

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2006-04-01
End:
2007-08-31
Geographic Region:
Description:Baltimore County
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  39.722Southern:  39.19
Western:  -76.93Eastern:  -76.33
Geographic Region:
Description:Baltimore City
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  39.373Southern:  39.196
Western:  -76.712Eastern:  -76.528

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Urban LTER: Human Settlements as Ecosystems: Metropolitan Baltimore from 1797-2100 (1997-2005)
Personnel:
Individual: Steward TA Pickett
Organization:Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Email Address:
picketts@caryinstitute.org
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1899-976x
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: NSF 9714835

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:Complete
Frequency:
Other Metadata

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo