Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Spiders in a Desert City: What the Behavior and Microclimate of Western Black Widows Can Teach Us About the Impacts of Urbanization

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:knb-lter-cap.693.1
Title:Spiders in a Desert City: What the Behavior and Microclimate of Western Black Widows Can Teach Us About the Impacts of Urbanization
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:
With the planet rapidly urbanizing, understanding the ecological effects of urbanization is a grand challenge for modern biology. For example, increased city temperatures known as the urban heat island effect, disproportionately impact nocturnal taxa and this consideration is widely overlooked. Slight shifts in the thermal microclimate have a cascade of ramifications that directly impact species density and distribution. Animal behavior is a trait that may explain why some species thrive after urbanization when others go locally extinct. In this study we followed 22 adult females of the western black widow, Latrodectus hesperus, from both urban and undisturbed Sonoran Desert habitats. We began looking for differences between urban and desert spiders under field conditions: boldness, voracity, web size and body condition. Both urban and desert spiders were then brought to the laboratory to see how their behavior changed. We found no behavioral differences between urban and desert spiders in the field or the laboratory. We did find that spider behavior differed between the field and the laboratory. Specifically, boldness in the laboratory was significantly lower compared to the field. Voracity was more repeatable in the laboratory versus the field, and boldness was strongly positively correlated with voracity in the laboratory, but not in the field. These behavioral shifts from the field to the laboratory favor the conclusion that black widow behavior is highly plastic and context dependent. Lastly, we monitored web temperature of black widow microhabitat continuously for an entire year using thermochron data loggers. We found microhabitat temperatures differences between urban and desert sites were greatest at night and absent during the daytime. We uncovered a seasonal effect with the highest magnitude temperature difference occurring during the springtime. Additionally, behavior was significantly correlated with field temperatures; the boldest spiders come from the warmest webs. However, we found little evidence that temperature predicts spider body condition or voracity, and body condition does not predict its behavioral expression. Our results highlight the importance of studying animal behavior to increase understanding of the factors that shape distribution and density in a lethal pest species.
Publication Date:2021-12-24
Language:english
For more information:
Visit: https://sustainability.asu.edu/caplter/data/data-catalog/view/knb-lter-cap.693.1/xml/
Visit: DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period
Begin:
2019-04-30
End:
2020-06-17

People and Organizations
Contact:Information Manager (Central Arizona–Phoenix LTER) [  email ]
Creator:Clark, Ryan (Arizona State University)
Creator:Johnson, J (Arizona State University, West campus)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
693_black_widow_behavior.csv
Description:
Western black widow spider characteristics and behaviors in the field and the laboratory
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-cap/693/1/70b0c15bffa69f614eca08af8d040e53
Name:693_black_widow_behavior.csv
Description:Western black widow spider characteristics and behaviors in the field and the laboratory
Number of Records:56
Number of Columns:31

Table Structure
Object Name:693_black_widow_behavior.csv
Size:10283 bytes
Authentication:69268b9abe2c483a16ecd720af755a85 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:ID  
3rd Leg  
Habitat  
Site  
Collection Date  
Web Length  
Web Width  
Web Height  
First Field Assay Date  
First Field Voracity  
First Field Boldness  
Second Field Assay Date  
Second Field Voracity  
Second Field Boldness  
Third Field Assay Date  
Third Field Voracity  
Third Field Boldness  
First Lab Assay Date  
First Lab Voracity  
First Lab Boldness  
Second Lab Assay Date  
Secon Lab Voracity  
Second Lab Boldness  
Third Lab Assay Date  
Third Lab Voracity  
Third Lab Boldness  
Field Collection Temperature  
Field Mass  
First Lab Assay Mass  
Second Lab Assay Mass  
Third Lab Assay Mass  
Definition:individual spider identification codespider third leg measurementhabitat classificationsite locationdate spiders were collected from the fieldweb lengthweb widthweb heightdate of first observationlatency to attack artificial prey in the field (seconds)latency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the field (seconds)date of second observationlatency to attack artificial prey in the field (seconds)latency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the field (seconds)date of third observationlatency to attack artificial prey in the field (seconds)latency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the field (seconds)date of first observationlatency to attack artificial prey in the laboratory (seconds)latency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the laboratory (seconds)date of second observationlatency to attack artificial prey in the laboratory (seconds)latency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the laboratory (seconds)date of third observationlatency to attack artificial prey in the laboratory (seconds)latency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the laboratory (seconds)temperature in the field at the time of collectionspider mass at the time of collectionspider mass at first assay in the laboratoryspider mass at second assay in the laboratoryspider mass at third assay in the laboratory
Storage Type:string  
float  
string  
string  
date  
float  
float  
float  
date  
string  
string  
date  
string  
string  
date  
string  
string  
date  
string  
string  
date  
string  
string  
date  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:nominalrationominalnominaldateTimeratioratioratiodateTimenominalnominaldateTimenominalnominaldateTimenominalnominaldateTimenominalnominaldateTimenominalnominaldateTimenominalnominalratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
Definitionindividual spider identification code
Unitmillimeter
Typereal
Min2.255 
Max5.621 
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codedesert
DefinitionSonoran desert habitat
Source
Code Definition
Codeurban
Definitionurban habitat
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeCalvary
DefinitionCalvary
Source
Code Definition
CodeMoores Gulch
DefinitionMoores Gulch
Source
Code Definition
CodeNew River Road
DefinitionNew River Road
Source
Code Definition
CodeOlive
DefinitionOlive
Source
Code Definition
CodeSunburst Farms
DefinitionSunburst Farms
Source
Code Definition
CodeSunnyside Drive
DefinitionSunnyside Drive
Source
Code Definition
CodeTable Mesa East
DefinitionTable Mesa East
Source
Code Definition
CodeTable Mesa West
DefinitionTable Mesa West
Source
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Unitcentimeter
Typenatural
Min30 
Max155 
Unitcentimeter
Typenatural
Min20 
Max150 
Unitcentimeter
Typenatural
Min20 
Max190 
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Definitionlatency to attack artificial prey in the field (seconds)
Definitionlatency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the field (seconds)
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Definitionlatency to attack artificial prey in the field (seconds)
Definitionlatency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the field (seconds)
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Definitionlatency to attack artificial prey in the field (seconds)
Definitionlatency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the field (seconds)
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Definitionlatency to attack artificial prey in the laboratory (seconds)
Definitionlatency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the laboratory (seconds)
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Definitionlatency to attack artificial prey in the laboratory (seconds)
Definitionlatency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the laboratory (seconds)
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Definitionlatency to attack artificial prey in the laboratory (seconds)
Definitionlatency to emerge from refuge following disturbance in the laboratory (seconds)
Unitcelsius
Typereal
Min24.6 
Max31.4 
Unitgram
Typereal
Min0.1063 
Max0.6167 
Unitgram
Typereal
Min0.225 
Max0.578 
Unitgram
Typereal
Min0.173 
Max0.546 
Unitgram
Typereal
Min0.268 
Max0.698 
Missing Value Code:  
CodeNA
Explmissing value
   
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
CodeNA
Explmissing value
Accuracy Report:                                                              
Accuracy Assessment:                                                              
Coverage:                                                              
Methods:                                                              

Data Package Usage Rights

This data package is released to the "public domain" under Creative Commons CC0 1.0 "No Rights Reserved" (see: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) has an ethical obligation to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or coauthorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is". The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
LTER controlled vocabularyurban, arthropods
LTER core areaspopulation studies, adapting to city life
Creator Defined Keyword Setwestern black widow, latrodectus hesperus, microhabitat, urban pest, urbanization, urban pest, animal behavior, behavioral syndrome, plasticity, thermal climate
CAPLTER Keyword Set Listcap lter, cap, caplter, central arizona phoenix long term ecological research, arizona, az, arid land, sonoran desert

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:
The study area was in the greater metropolitan city of Phoenix, Arizona and the accompanying rural desert. Both habitat types occurred within the Sonoran Desert of the Southwest United States. Four urban field sites and four desert field sites were used. All field sites were located a minimum of 3.5 km apart from one another. Desert sites were located more than 25 km outside of metropolitan Phoenix, in remote locations relatively undisturbed by human development. Field sites were used if they contained a minimum of three adult female western black widows within one hectare of each other. Four to five adult female widows were monitored per site (n= 18 urban, 17 desert). A Thermochron iButton device model DS1921G-F5 was deployed with each focal spider. Devices were programmed to record the ambient air temperature of the spider web at synchronized recurring intervals. The digital thermometer measures temperature in 0.5°C increments and has a temperature range of -40°C to +85°C, with an accuracy of ±1°C in the range of -30° to +70°C. Each iButton was first housed inside a small square envelope constructed with a single layer of mylar blanket (aluminized plastic sheeting) 4cm x 2.5cm and held together with a piece of transparent tape. The mylar material was chosen because of its low cost, superior ability to reflect radiant heat, and protect against sudden heat loss due to wind or rain. Once constructed, these mylar envelopes were packaged inside common construction flagging stakes with standard office staples. The flags provided a discreet installation that would not draw attention and ward off theft or vandalism, especially in the urban habitat. Initial deployment of the flag sensors occurred in occupied adult webs only and had to be greater than 5m apart from one another. Throughout the course of the study, flags remained in place even if the spider vacated their web for any reason including collection, disturbance, or mortality. Flags were placed no less than 20cm from the ground, 5cm away from an object (tree, wall, etc.) and within 0.5m of the foraging area. I define the foraging area as the spider's primary location in the web when not constructing new web lines. This zone of the web was identified prior to flag positioning. Most flags were anchored in the ground, where a few others were affixed to a nearby structure to make it as close to the foraging area of the web. Each flag was required to be in contact with the silk of the spider's web for the initial placement. Sites were visited biweekly for data download and maintenance. After each visit, flags were returned to the original position but not required to remain in contact with the web to reduce the amount of disturbance. Over the course of the year, fifteen iButtons (≈ 42%) were lost due to theft, vandalism, flood, or battery malfunction. In total, nine urban and eleven desert digital thermometers remained at the end of the study producing 361,364 individual temperature measurements. Temperature recording began June 17th, 2019 and ended on June 16th, 2020. We estimated the nighttime average temperature of the western black widow’s microhabitat as the mean temperature from 2100-0000 hr. in 10-minute intervals. These first few hours after nightfall are by far the spider’s most active period. In contrast, we used the 3-hour interval 12 hours later (0900-1200 hr.) as the microhabitat average daytime temperature. We used the mean nighttime web temperatures during a two-week window (June 17th, 2019 to June 30th, 2019) approximately coinciding with most behavioral assays to test for correlations between web temperature and spider phenotypes (including web size). Interruptions in individual data loggers that lasted more than one day were not used in that respective month’s analysis. Beginning on the night of initial stationing of data loggers, We began conducting assays to measure boldness, voracity, and web dimensions. Behavior assays were performed between June 17th and July 11th, 2019, occurring between 2100 and 0000 hours. Behaviors were measured in a set sequence: voracity always occurred first then >15 minutes later, boldness was measured. Spiders were only assayed if 1) they were out in their web not in the refuge, and 2) were relatively motionless in foraging posture. Three repeated measures of each assay were conducted throughout the field season with 7 days always separating repeated measures. Measurements were taken for web dimensions one time on the first night of assays only. Dimensions were recorded from the widest portion of the web’s length, width, and height. Web volume was calculated as L x W x H. Voracity was calculated as latency to attack prey and is reported in seconds. A small wooden dowel about 10 cm in length was attached with tape to the end of a rechargeable electric toothbrush. Each trial commenced when a simulated prey item (tip of toothbrush apparatus vibration) was applied to the web 20 cm from the spider. Each voracity assay concluded at the point when the individual first began throwing silk at the artificial prey or after 120 seconds had elapsed with no contact. Boldness was defined as the latency to emerge from inside one’s refuge following a standardized disturbance. To simulate a disturbance, spiders were sprayed three times with short bursts of condensed air from approximately 30-40 cm away to initiate a retreat to the web’s refuge. Latency to re-emerge back into the web past the refuge entrance was recorded in seconds to a maximum of 30 minutes, with shorter latencies indicating bolder animals. At the close of the field assays, all remaining spiders were collected, weighed, and transported to the laboratory. Spiders were given eight weeks to acclimate to their new environment before any behavior assays took place. All spiders were housed individually in transparent 72-liter plastic tubs (57 × 38 × 33 cm). A refuge was attached to the wall and centered 22cm from the bottom of the container. The refuge was fashioned from a plastic condiment cup, 7cm in diameter, 4.5cm deep, and blacked out by gray utility tape. A 2.5cm hole was cut into the side of the cup for an entrance. A single wooden dowel 50cm in length positioned from the refuge entrance and attached to the opposite end of the arena was used as scaffolding to aid in establishing a web. Spiders were kept on a 12:12 reverse photoperiod at room temperature (24°-26°C) for the duration of the study. Each spider was fed one adult house cricket, Acheta domesticus, visually estimated to be roughly 50% of the spider's size each week. Feeding always occurred three days prior to each behavior assay during the study. Laboratory assays took place between August 29th and September 12th, 2019. The two behavioral assays were conducted exactly as they were in the field. Assays took place approximately one hour after the start of the dark cycle under dim red light. Each spider was weighed no more than 24-hours following each laboratory assay. Once the laboratory assays commenced, each spiders 3rd leg was photographed and then measured using ImageJ software v1.53a.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@environmentaldatainitiative.org
Web Address:
https://environmentaldatainitiative.org
Id:https://ror.org/0330j0z60
Creators:
Individual: Ryan Clark
Organization:Arizona State University
Email Address:
Rcclark6@asu.edu
Individual: J Johnson
Organization:Arizona State University, West campus
Email Address:
jchadwick@asu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-0791
Contacts:
Organization:Central Arizona–Phoenix LTER
Position:Information Manager
Address:
Arizona State University,
Global Institute of Sustainability and Innovation,
Tempe, AZ 85287-5402 USA
Email Address:
caplter.data@asu.edu
Web Address:
https://sustainability-innovation.asu.edu/caplter/
Metadata Providers:
Individual: Ryan Clark
Organization:Arizona State University
Email Address:
Rcclark6@asu.edu

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2019-04-30
End:
2020-06-17
Sampling Site: 
Description:Calvary
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -112.1205Latitude (degree): 33.6019
Sampling Site: 
Description:Moores Gulch
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -112.1325Latitude (degree): 33.9992
Sampling Site: 
Description:New River Road
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -112.1971Latitude (degree): 33.8578
Sampling Site: 
Description:Olive
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -112.181Latitude (degree): 33.5604
Sampling Site: 
Description:Sunburst Farms
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -112.1513Latitude (degree): 33.6212
Sampling Site: 
Description:Sunnyside Drive
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -112.1676Latitude (degree): 33.5927
Sampling Site: 
Description:Table Mesa East
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -112.0993Latitude (degree): 33.9738
Sampling Site: 
Description:Table Mesa West
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -112.1854Latitude (degree): 33.9839
Taxonomic Range:
Classification:
Rank Name:kingdom
Rank Value:Animalia
Common Name:animals
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 202423 (Animalia)
Classification:
Rank Name:subkingdom
Rank Value:Bilateria
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 914154 (Bilateria)
Classification:
Rank Name:infrakingdom
Rank Value:Protostomia
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 914155 (Protostomia)
Classification:
Rank Name:superphylum
Rank Value:Ecdysozoa
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 914158 (Ecdysozoa)
Classification:
Rank Name:phylum
Rank Value:Arthropoda
Common Name:arthropods
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 82696 (Arthropoda)
Classification:
Rank Name:subphylum
Rank Value:Chelicerata
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 82697 (Chelicerata)
Classification:
Rank Name:class
Rank Value:Euchelicerata
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 1117839 (Euchelicerata)
Classification:
Rank Name:subclass
Rank Value:Arachnida
Common Name:arachnids
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 1117840 (Arachnida)
Classification:
Rank Name:order
Rank Value:Araneae
Common Name:spiders
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 82732 (Araneae)
Classification:
Rank Name:family
Rank Value:Theridiidae
Common Name:cobweb weavers
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 82740 (Theridiidae)
Classification:
Rank Name:genus
Rank Value:Latrodectus
Common Name:widow spiders
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 848644 (Latrodectus)
Classification:
Rank Name:species
Rank Value:Latrodectus hesperus
Common Name:western black widow
Identifer:Integrated Taxonomic Information Service (ITIS)
Info for ID: 859132 (Latrodectus hesperus)

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Central Arizona–Phoenix Long-Term Ecological Research Project
Personnel:
Individual: Daniel Childers
Organization:Arizona State University
Email Address:
dan.childers@asu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3904-0803
Role:Principal Investigator
Individual: Nancy Grimm
Organization:Arizona State University
Email Address:
nbgrimm@asu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9374-660X
Role:Co-principal Investigator
Individual: Sharon Hall
Organization:Arizona State University
Email Address:
sharonjhall@asu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8859-6691
Role:Co-principal Investigator
Individual: Billie Turner II
Organization:Arizona State University
Email Address:
Billie.L.Turner@asu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6507-521X
Role:Co-principal Investigator
Individual: Abigail York
Organization:Arizona State University
Email Address:
Abigail.York@asu.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2313-9262
Role:Co-principal Investigator
Abstract:Phase IV of the Central Arizona-Phoenix LTER (CAP) continues to focus on the question: How do the ecosystem services provided by urban ecological infrastructure (UEI) affect human outcomes and behavior, and how do human actions affect patterns of urban ecosystem structure and function and, ultimately, urban sustainability and resilience? The overarching goal is to foster social-ecological urban research aimed at understanding these complex systems using a holistic, ecology of cities perspective while contributing to an ecology for cities that enhances urban sustainability and resilience. This goal is being met through four broad programmatic objectives: (1) use long-term observations and datasets to articulate and answer new questions requiring a long-term perspective; (2) develop and use predictive models and future-looking scenarios to help answer research questions; (3) employ existing urban ecological theory while articulating new theory; and (4) build transdisciplinary partnerships to foster resilience and enhance sustainability in urban ecosystems while educating urban dwellers of all ages and experiences. CAP IV research is organized around eight interdisciplinary questions and ten long-term datasets and experiments, and researchers are organized into eight Interdisciplinary Research Themes to pursue these long-term research questions.
Funding: NSF Awards: CAP I: DEB-9714833, CAP II: DEB-0423704, CAP III: DEB-1026865, CAP IV: DEB-1832016
Additional Award Information:
Funder:National Science Foundation
Funder ID:https://ror.org/021nxhr62
Number:1832016
Title:LTER: CAP IV - Investigating urban ecology and sustainability through the lens of Urban Ecological Infrastructure
URL:https://nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1832016&HistoricalAwards=false

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:this dataset is complete and or updates are not anticipated
Frequency:notPlanned
Other Metadata

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo