Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Mass and Nutrient Loss in Decomposing Hardwood Boles on Watershed 1 at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, 1990 - present

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:knb-lter-hbr.184.3
Title:Mass and Nutrient Loss in Decomposing Hardwood Boles on Watershed 1 at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, 1990 - present
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

In 1990-1991 segments of boles from felled sugar maple (Acer saccharum), yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis) and American beech (Fagus grandifolia) trees were placed in the field to study the rate of decomposition and nutrient loss (or gain) over time. The segments incubated in the field, ranging from 0.5-1.3 meters in length, were paired with fresh segments from the same trees. The fresh segments were taken to the lab shortly after felling, dried, weighed and subsampled. Fresh samples of wood and bark were collected separately. Incubated bole segments were collected in 1993 (T1), 1997 (T2), 2001 (T3), 2007 (T4) and 2015/2016 (T5). The whole bole segments were transported to the lab, measured, dried and weighed to determine mass loss. Subsamples of the bole wood and bark were collected for chemical analysis, including C, N, H, Ca, Mg, K, Si, Al, Pb, Zn, Mn and Fe. Chemical analyses were conducted concurrently on the fresh (T0) and incubated samples. This data set includes the masses of the fresh and incubated boles along with the concentrations of the chemical analytes. Element pools in the boles can be calculated by multiplying the concentrations by the mass values. This data set includes chemical data for samples collected in 1993, 2001, and 2007 and their paired fresh samples. Samples from 1997 were measured for mass, but inadvertently discarded prior to chemical analysis.

These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.  

Publication Date:2022-04-22
For more information:
Visit: DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period
Begin:
1990-11-09
End:
2016-07-31

People and Organizations
Contact:Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study [  email ]
Creator:Johnson, Chris (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University)
Creator:Clymans, Wim (Department of Geology, Lund University)
Associate:Siccama, Thomas G. (Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, associated researcher)
Associate:Koppers, Mary Margaret (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University, associated researcher)
Associate:Denny, Ellen (National Phenology Network, associated researcher)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
w1_wood_decomp
Description:
Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest wood decomposition mass data.
Data Table Name:
LogDecompChem
Description:
Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest log decomposition chemistry data.
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-hbr/184/3/fe125f6fd399399cefc632311b3e7b79
Name:w1_wood_decomp
Description:Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest wood decomposition mass data.
Number of Records:71
Number of Columns:16

Table Structure
Object Name:w1_wood_decomp.csv
Size:7262 bytes
Authentication:c6100255b56c77f73baf0e2cb723a976 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Log  
Date_felled  
Date_prep_field  
Date_pulled_field  
Decay_time  
Rain_gauge_loc  
Tree_spec  
Total_Mass_Moist_kg  
Wood_Mass_Moist_kg  
Bark_Mass_Moist_kg  
Total_Mass_Dens_kg  
Wood_Mass_Dens_kg  
Bark_Mass_Dens_kg  
Total_Mass_Meas_kg  
Wood_Mass_Meas_kg  
Bark_Mass_Meas_kg  
Definition:Number assigned to a log segmentDate tree was felledDate log segment was placed in the fieldDate log segment was removed from the fieldAmount of time (in years) that the log segment remained in the fieldRain gauge log was situated by in the fieldSpecies of tree boleDry mass of wood and bark in the log segment calculated by the moisture methodDry mass of wood in the log segment calculated by the moisture methodDry mass of bark in the log segment calculated by the moisture methodDry mass of wood and bark in the log segment calculated by the density methodDry mass of wood in the log segment calculated by the density methodDry mass of bark in the log segment calculated by the density methodDry mass of wood and bark in the log segment after incubationDry mass of wood in the log segment after incubationDry mass of bark in the log segment after incubation
Storage Type:string  
date  
date  
date  
float  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:nominaldateTimedateTimedateTimerationominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
DefinitionNumber assigned to a log segment
FormatYYYY-MM
Precision
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
Unitnumber
Typereal
Min1.92 
Max25.27 
DefinitionRain gauge log was situated by in the field
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeACSA3
DefinitionAcer saccharum (Sugar Maple)
Source
Code Definition
CodeFAGR
DefinitionFagus grandifolia (American beech)
Source
Code Definition
CodeBEAL2
DefinitionBetula alleghaniensis (Yellow birch)
Source
Unitkilogram
Typereal
Min9.21 
Max67.46 
Unitkilogram
Typereal
Min8.25 
Max63.61 
Unitkilogram
Typereal
Min0.96 
Max7.08 
Unitkilogram
Typereal
Min8.9 
Max66.37 
Unitkilogram
Typereal
Min8.42 
Max63.68 
Unitkilogram
Typereal
Min0.61 
Max4.92 
Unitkilogram
Typereal
Min1.1508 
Max47.93 
Unitkilogram
Typereal
Min-88.88 
Max43.15 
Unitkilogram
Typereal
Min-88.88 
Max5.25 
Missing Value Code:      
Code0000-00-00
ExplLog remains in field
Code-99.99
ExplLog remains in field
               
Code-99.99
Expllog remains in the field
Code-99.99
ExplData not available
Code-99.99
ExplData not available
Accuracy Report:                                
Accuracy Assessment:                                
Coverage:                                
Methods:                                

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-hbr/184/3/4d9d8f83a2d81ccc58a71a201b2b50d2
Name:LogDecompChem
Description:Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest log decomposition chemistry data.
Number of Records:235
Number of Columns:18

Table Structure
Object Name:LogDecompChem.csv
Size:21651 bytes
Authentication:25c574e5a4d19c662c6c0e448392edd4 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Code  
Log  
Tissue  
Time  
Tree_spec  
Al_mg/kg  
K_mg/kg  
Mn_mg/kg  
P_mg/kg  
Pb_mg/kg  
Zn_mg/kg  
Mg_mg/kg  
Ca_mg/kg  
Fe_mg/kg  
Si_mg/kg  
N_mg/kg  
C_g/kg  
H_g/kg  
Definition:Lab code assigned to sample consisting of log number, tissue type, time of collection, and species codeNumber assigned to a log segmentTissue typeIncremental sampling periodSpecies of tree boleConcentration of aluminum in the sampleConcentration of potassium in the sampleConcentration of manganese in the sampleConcentration of phosphorous in the sampleConcentration of lead in the sampleConcentration of zinc in the sampleConcentration of magnesium in the sampleConcentration of calcium in the sampleConcentration of iron in the sampleConcentration of SiO2 in the sampleConcentration of nitrogen in the sampleConcentration of carbon in the sampleConcentration of hydrogen in the sample
Storage Type:string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:nominalnominalnominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
DefinitionLab code assigned to sample consisting of log number, tissue type, time of collection, and species code
DefinitionNumber assigned to a log segment
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeBark
DefinitionBark
Source
Code Definition
CodeWood
DefinitionWood
Source
DefinitionIncremental sampling period
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeACSA3
DefinitionAcer saccharum (Sugar Maple)
Source
Code Definition
CodeFAGR
DefinitionFagus grandifolia (American beech)
Source
Code Definition
CodeBEAL2
DefinitionBetula alleghaniensis (Yellow birch)
Source
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typereal
Min0.12 
Max187.83 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typenatural
Min44 
Max2832 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typenatural
Min35 
Max1159 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typenatural
Min18 
Max1134 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typereal
Min0.05 
Max25.58 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typereal
Min1.9 
Max753.6 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typenatural
Min39 
Max982 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typenatural
Min451 
Max37523 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typereal
Min2.1 
Max116.7 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typenatural
Min136 
Max10503 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typenatural
Min524 
Max19751 
UnitgramPerKilogram
Typenatural
Min429 
Max653 
UnitgramPerKilogram
Typenatural
Min41 
Max85 
Missing Value Code:    
Code-9999
ExplData not available
Code-9999
ExplData not available
Code-9999
ExplData not available
Code-9999.99
ExplNot measured
Code-9999
ExplNot measured
Code-9999
ExplNot measured
Code-9999
ExplNot measured
Code-9999.99
ExplNot measured
Code-9999.9
ExplNot measured
Code-9999
ExplNot measured
Code-9999
ExplNot measured
Code-9999.99
ExplNot measured
Code-9999
ExplNot measured
Code-9999
ExplNot measured
Code-9999
ExplNot measured
Code-9999
ExplNot measured
Accuracy Report:                                    
Accuracy Assessment:                                    
Coverage:                                    
Methods:                                    

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
LTER Core Research Areadisturbance patterns, organic matter
LTER Controlled Vocabularyecosystems, forests, watersheds, calcium, carbon, decomposition, lead, nitrogen, potassium, silicon, zinc
HBES VocabularyHBR, Hubbard Brook LTER, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study, HBES, HBEF, New Hampshire, NH, White Mountain National Forest, American beech, coarse woody debris, Watershed 1, sugar maple, yellow birch
ISO 19115 Topic Categorybiota, climatologyMeteorologyAtmosphere
National Research & Development TaxonomyClimate change, Climate change effects, Ecology, Ecosystems, & Environment

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

SAMPLING DESIGN

This study was performed at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) in central New Hampshire, USA. Most of the HBEF is northern hardwood forest, dominated by sugar maple (Acer saccharum Marsh.), American beech (Fagus grandifolia Erhr.), and yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis Britt.). Together, these three species accounted for 86% of the above-ground living tree biomass in a similarly situated stand at the HBEF when this study was initiated in 1991 (Siccama et al. 2007). This work was conducted in the area of the south-facing experimental watersheds 1-6 at the HBEF. In July 1990 and May 1991, 71 trees of the three dominant species were felled with a chain saw. The trees were approximately 50-70 years old. From each felled tree, two adjacent segments of the bole, each approximately 1.5-m long (range: 0.99 – 2.22 m), were isolated with a chain saw. After measuring the length and the diameter at each end, one of these segments was then placed on the forest floor under fully intact forest canopy. The incubated bole segments were placed on sloping ground, approximately perpendicular to contours, in two similar stands approximately 200 m apart. The other ‘fresh’ segment was taken to the lab for sampling. Each of the 71 samples incubated in situ was therefore paired with a fresh sample from the same tree.

INITIAL LABORATORY WORK

After measuring the dimensions of the fresh bole-segments, disks about 8-10 cm thick were cut from one end of each segment. The bark was separated from the wood of each disk, and both were dried at 80o C to constant weight. Subsamples were collected from the fresh wood disks by drilling from the side to the center with a 2.5-cm drill bit. The dried bark samples and the wood shavings were ground in a Wiley mill. Subsamples from the same log were composited for chemical analysis.

FIELD COLLECTION PROCEDURES

Incubated boles were collected from the field in April, 1993 (T1; 2Y); May, 1997 (T2; 6Y); May-July, 2001 (T3; 10Y); July, 2007 (T4; 16Y) and July of 2015 and 2016 (T5; 25Y). Three boles of each species (nine total) were collected in 1993, 1997 and 2001. In 2007, three beech, six maple and six birch boles were collected. In 2015/2016, all identifiable remaining boles were collected. After removing any surface litter the bole was gently rolled onto a sampling tarp, and any loose material was collected in a bag. The log was placed in the bag and returned to the laboratory for processing.

POST-INCUBATION SAMPLE PREPARATION

The incubated boles were dried at 80 oC to constant weight, which was recorded. The dry boles were laid out on kraft paper, along with the loose debris collected in the field. After measuring the dimensions of each log, we then removed the bark from the bole and gathered the bark fragments from the debris. The mass of the bark and the wood (log+loose debris) was recorded. Subsamples of the log were collected by drilling to the center of the log with a 2.5-cm bit. Log, loose debris, and bark samples were ground in a Wiley mill for chemical analysis. A wood sample for chemical analysis was created by mixing loose debris and log samples proportionally by mass. Two beech boles collected in 2001 (10Y) had so little bark remaining that it was not sampled and judged to be completely decomposed. The samples collected in 1997 (6Y) were inadvertently discarded after mass determination, so we have no chemical data for those samples. In 2015/2016, there was so much fine loose rotten wood and bark that a separate sample (mixed) is included in the archive. In total, 42 incubated boles have been collected from the field to date. Chemical measurements have been made on 106 bark samples (54 fresh, 52 decomposed) and 108 wood samples (54 fresh, 54 decomposed) plus 21 mixed tissue samples from T5.

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS

Total carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen were measured on oven-dried subsamples using a Carlo Erba EA1108 elemental analyzer. Other elemental concentrations were measured on HNO3 digests of the samples. A crucible containing approximately two grams of oven-dried sample was placed in a muffle furnace (500 oC) overnight. The ash was then dissolved into 8 mL of 6 M HNO3, filtered through a Whatman #40 paper filter, and brought to a volume of 50 mL using deionized water. The concentrations of Ca, Mg, K, P, and Mn were measured using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). All values were blank-corrected. Silica was analyzed on a sodium hydroxide extract of wood and bark samples. 100 mg of sample was extracted with 40 mL of 0.5 M NaOH for 4 hours in an 85C warm water bath. Two milliliters of extract were added to 4 mL of 0.25 M HCl. The neutralized extract was analyzed colorimetrically for Si as SiO2.

CALCULATIONS

The disks were used to calculate the initial dry masses of wood and bark for the paired sample left in the field using two different calculation methods. The density method used the density calculated for these disks and the measured bark/wood mass ratio for the fresh bole were used with the initial dimensions of the incubated bole to compute the initial masses of wood and bark. The moisture method used the moisture calculated for these disks and the measured bark/wood mass ratio to compute the mass of the in situ log. These initial log masses can be compared to the incubated bole masses to determine the mass loss during decomposition.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@environmentaldatainitiative.org
Web Address:
https://environmentaldatainitiative.org
Id:https://ror.org/0330j0z60
Creators:
Individual: Chris Johnson
Organization:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University
Individual: Wim Clymans
Organization:Department of Geology, Lund University
Contacts:
Organization:Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study
Email Address:
hbr-im@lternet.edu
Associated Parties:
Individual: Thomas G. Siccama
Organization:Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
Role:associated researcher
Individual: Mary Margaret Koppers
Organization:Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University
Role:associated researcher
Individual: Ellen Denny
Organization:National Phenology Network
Role:associated researcher

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
1990-11-09
End:
2016-07-31
Geographic Region:
Description:Watershed 1 is an 11.8 ha watershed extending from the weir at 488 m elevation to the ridge at 747 m
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  43.959356Southern:  43.952121
Western:  -71.730866Eastern:  -71.725832

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Long-Term Ecological Research at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (1988)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy J Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 8702331
Related Project:
Title:Long-term Ecological Research (LTER) at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (1992)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy J Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 9211768
Related Project:
Title:LTER: Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (1998)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy J Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 9810221
Related Project:
Title:Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBR-LTER) (2005)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy J Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 0423259
Related Project:
Title:Long-Term Ecological Research at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (2010)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy J Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 1114804
Related Project:
Title:LTER: Long Term Ecological Research at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (2016)
Personnel:
Individual: Peter M Groffman
Organization:Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Email Address:
groffmanp@caryinstitute.org
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-6255
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 1637685

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:complete
Frequency:
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'gramPerKilogram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'gramPerKilogram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = ''
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = ''
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'gramPerKilogram'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo