Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Foliar and sapwood tissue response to Ca-treatments at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, 2000 – 2015

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:knb-lter-hbr.217.3
Title:Foliar and sapwood tissue response to Ca-treatments at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, 2000 – 2015
Alternate Identifier:knb-lter-hbr.217
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

Background

Acidic deposition has caused a depletion of calcium (Ca) in the northeastern forest soils. One time application of wollastonite (CaSiO3 - 1.2 Mg ha-1 of Ca) was done at watershed 1 (WS1) of the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBEF) in 1999 to evaluate its effects on various functions of the HBEF ecosystem. This rate of application was intended to increase the existing base saturation of the soil from 10% to approximately 19%, and to increase the soil pH to the level that was estimated to exist ~50 years prior to treatment. More details on the treatment can be found at http://www.hubbardbrook.org/research/longterm/calcium/w1_overview/index.html. The overall objective of this study was to evaluate changes in foliar and sapwood metabolic parameters and microbial diversity as indicators of stress and overall health in trees exposed to Ca-supplementation. Raw data from Ca-treated WS1 are compared with WS3 (reference watershed) for cellular metabolites, exchangeable foliar chemistry (not totals) 2000-2015. These watersheds are in close proximity (less than 1.5 Km apart) with similar geology, temperature, soils, and overall climate. For more details see a list of references given below

Ca-Supplementation-Metabolic Study (WS1 & along eastern edge of WS3)

SUMMARY: The effects of Ca addition on foliar soluble (extractable in 5% HClO4) ions, chlorophyll, polyamines, and amino acids were studied in three hardwood species, namely sugar maple, yellow birch, and American beech. We further analyzed these effects in relation to elevation at Ca-supplemented WS1 and reference WS3 watersheds. During the earlier years foliar soluble Ca increased significantly in all species at mid and high elevations at Ca-supplemented WS1. This was accompanied by increases in soluble P, chlorophyll, and two amino acids, glutamate and glycine. A decrease in known metabolic indicators of physiological stress (i.e. the amino acids, arginine and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and the diamine, putrescine) was also observed. In general, these changes were species-specific and occurred in an elevation dependent manner. Despite an observed increase in Ca at high elevation for all three species, only sugar maple exhibited a decrease in foliar putrescine at this elevation indicating possible remediation from Ca deficiency. At higher elevations of the reference WS3 site, foliar concentrations of Ca and Mg, as well as Ca:Mn ratios were lower, whereas Al, putrescine, spermidine, and GABA were generally higher. Comparison of metabolic data from these three species reinforces the earlier findings that sugar maple is the most sensitive and American beech the least sensitive species to soil Ca limitation. Furthermore, there was an increase in sensitivity with an increase in elevation.

These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.

Short Name:MinochaCaAddition
Publication Date:2019-02-11
Language:English

Time Period
Begin:
2000-07-01
End:
2015-08-31

People and Organizations
Contact:Information Manager (Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study) [  email ]
Creator:Minocha, Rakesh 
Creator:Long, Stephanie 

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
foliar concentrations
Description:
Concentration of amino acids, polyamines, exchangeable ions and chlorophyll in foliar samples of four tree species on W1 and W3, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
Data Table Name:
sapwood concentrations
Description:
Concentration of amino acids, polyamines and exchangeable ions in sapwood samples of four tree species on W1 and W3, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-hbr/217/3/ee2dcb9b6c0dc1c901efc448a18d2396
Name:foliar concentrations
Description:Concentration of amino acids, polyamines, exchangeable ions and chlorophyll in foliar samples of four tree species on W1 and W3, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
Number of Records:1258
Number of Columns:52

Table Structure
Object Name:HubbardBrook_WS1-WS3_foliarAminoAcid.csv
Size:408832 byte
Authentication:a9f26e5862051179b922939bdd17961f Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 SiteNameCollDateSpeciesPlotTreeTreatmentElevationTissuexCaxKxMgxMnxPxAlxFexZnTotChloroChloro_aChloro_bChloro_ab_ratioSolProteinsPre-PutPutPost-PutPre-SpdSpdPost-SpdSpmspd/putAspGluGlnSerArgThrGlyArg+ThrArg+Thr+GlyAlaProGABAValMetIleLeuTrpPheCys(+Cystine)OrnLysHisNotes
Column Name:SiteName  
CollDate  
Species  
Plot  
Tree  
Treatment  
Elevation  
Tissue  
xCa  
xK  
xMg  
xMn  
xP  
xAl  
xFe  
xZn  
TotChloro  
Chloro_a  
Chloro_b  
Chloro_ab_ratio  
SolProteins  
Pre-Put  
Put  
Post-Put  
Pre-Spd  
Spd  
Post-Spd  
Spm  
spd/put  
Asp  
Glu  
Gln  
Ser  
Arg  
Thr  
Gly  
Arg+Thr  
Arg+Thr+Gly  
Ala  
Pro  
GABA  
Val  
Met  
Ile  
Leu  
Trp  
Phe  
Cys(+Cystine)  
Orn  
Lys  
His  
Notes  
Definition:Collection site as designated by name, StateYear samples were collectedSpecies of tree that tissue was collected fromPlot name or number within siteTree numberTreatmentRelative elevation of collection site (High, Mid, Low)Foliar or sapwood tissue5% PCA soluble Ca by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble K by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Mg by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Mn by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble P by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Al by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Fe by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Zn by ICP (per gram fresh weight)Total Chlorophyll by spectrophotometer (per gram fresh weight)Chlorophyll A by spectrophotometer (per gram fresh weight)Chlorophyll B by spectrophotometer (per gram fresh weight)Ratio of Chlorophyll A/BSoluble proteins by spectrophotometer (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Unidentified Amine Peak eluted just prior to Putrescine (quantified using Put std curve) by HPLC (not present in most samples) (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Putrescine by HPLC5% PCA soluble Unidentified Amine Peak eluted directly after Putrescine (quantified using Put std curve) by HPLC (not present in most samples) (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Unidentified Amine Peak eluted just prior to Spermidine (quantified using Spd std curve) by HPLC (not present in most samples) (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Spermidine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Unidentified Amine Peak eluted directly after Spermidine (quantified using Spd std curve) by HPLC(not present in most samples) (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Spermine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)Ratio of Spermidine to Putrescine5% PCA soluble Aspartic Acid by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Glutamic Acid by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Glutamine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Serine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Arginine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA solubleThreonine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Glycine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Arginine+Threonine by HPLC (system was unable to separate these 2 amino acids) (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Arginine+Threonine+Glycine by HPLC (system was unable to separate these 3 amino acids) (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Alanine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Proline by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble g-Aminobutyric Acid by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Valine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Methionine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Isoleucine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Leucine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Tryptophan by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Phenylalanine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Cystine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Ornithine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Lysine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Histidine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)Sample notes
Storage Type:string  
date  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
Measurement Type:nominaldateTimenominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratiorationominal
Measurement Values Domain:
Definitionany text
FormatYYYY
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeCYRS
DefinitionRed spruce Current year needles
Source
Code Definition
CodeYB
DefinitionYellow Birch (Betula alleghaniensis)
Source
Code Definition
CodeWA
DefinitionWhite Ash ( Fraxinus americana)
Source
Code Definition
CodeAB
DefinitionAmerican Beech (Fagus grandifolia)
Source
Code Definition
CodeSM
DefinitionSugar Maple (Acer saccharum )
Source
Code Definition
CodePYRS
DefinitionRed spruce Previous year needles
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code11
Definition11
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7
Source
Code Definition
Code8
Definition8
Source
Code Definition
CodeHW-High
DefinitionHW-High
Source
Code Definition
CodeHW-Mid
DefinitionHW-Mid
Source
Code Definition
CodeHW-Low
DefinitionHW-Low
Source
Code Definition
CodeHW-Mid-Low
DefinitionHW-Mid-Low
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1
Source
Code Definition
CodeRidge Top
DefinitionRidge Top
Source
Code Definition
Code12
Definition12
Source
Definitionany text
Definitionany text
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeHigh
DefinitionHigh elevation sampling location
Source
Code Definition
CodeMid
DefinitionMid-elevation sampling location
Source
Code Definition
CodeLow
DefinitionLow elevation sampling location
Source
Code Definition
CodeMid-Low
DefinitionLocation between the mid and low elevation sites
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codefoliage
DefinitionFoliar samples
Source
UnitmicromolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicromolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicromolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicromolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicromolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicromolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicromolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicromolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
Unitnumber
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmilligramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
Unitnumber
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
Definitionany text
Missing Value Code:                
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
 
Accuracy Report:                                                                                                        
Accuracy Assessment:                                                                                                        
Coverage:                                                                                                        
Methods:                                                                                                        

Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-hbr/217/3/646d1fe604ddada00657ae60de8fddbb
Name:sapwood concentrations
Description:Concentration of amino acids, polyamines and exchangeable ions in sapwood samples of four tree species on W1 and W3, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
Number of Records:485
Number of Columns:44

Table Structure
Object Name:HubbardBrook_WS1-WS3_sapwoodAminoAcid.csv
Size:125297 byte
Authentication:9e48ad4d2982f5f8c926c92cf532f444 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 SiteNameCollDateSpeciesPlotTreeTreatmentElevationTissueExchCaExchKExchMgExchMnExchPExchAlExchFeExchZnPutSpdSpmspd/putAspGluGlnSerArgThrGlyArg+ThrArg+Thr+GlyAlaProGABAValMetIleLeuTrpPheTrp+PheCys+CystineOrnLysHisNotes
Column Name:SiteName  
CollDate  
Species  
Plot  
Tree  
Treatment  
Elevation  
Tissue  
xCa  
xK  
xMg  
xMn  
xP  
xAl  
xFe  
xZn  
Put  
Spd  
Spm  
spd/put  
Asp  
Glu  
Gln  
Ser  
Arg  
Thr  
Gly  
Arg+Thr  
Arg+Thr+Gly  
Ala  
Pro  
GABA  
Val  
Met  
Ile  
Leu  
Trp  
Phe  
Trp+Phe  
Cys+Cystine  
Orn  
Lys  
His  
Notes  
Definition:Collection site as designated by name, StateYear samples were collectedSpecies of tree that tissue was collected fromPlot name or number within siteTree numberTreatmentRelative elevation of collection site (High, Mid, Low)Type of tissue collected5% PCA soluble Ca by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble K by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Mg by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Mn by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble P by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Al by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Fe by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Zn by ICP (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Putrescine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Spermidine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Spermine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)Ratio of Spermidine to Putrescine5% PCA soluble Aspartic Acid by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Glutamic Acid by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Glutamine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Serine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Arginine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Threonine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Glycine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Arginine+Threonine by HPLC (system was unable to separate these 2 amino acids) (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Arginine+Threonine+Glycine by HPLC (system was unable to separate these 3 amino acids) (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Alanine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Proline by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble g-Aminobutyric Acid by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Valine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Methionine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Isoleucine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Leucine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Tryptophan by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Phenylalanine by HPLC5% PCA soluble Tryptophan+Phenylalanine by HPLC (system was unable to separate these 2 amino acids)5% PCA soluble Cysteine+Cystine by HPLC (system was unable to separate these 2 amino acids)5% PCA soluble Ornithine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Lysine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)5% PCA soluble Histidine by HPLC (per gram fresh weight)Sample notes
Storage Type:string  
date  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
string  
Measurement Type:nominaldateTimenominalnominalnominalnominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratiorationominal
Measurement Values Domain:
Definitionany text
FormatYYYY
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeYB
DefinitionYellow Birch (Betula alleghaniensis)
Source
Code Definition
CodeRS
DefinitionRed Spruce (Picea rubens)
Source
Code Definition
CodeAB
DefinitionAmerican Beech (Fagus grandifolia)
Source
Code Definition
CodeSM
DefinitionSugar Maple (Acer saccharum )
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code12
Definition12
Source
Code Definition
Code11
Definition11
Source
Code Definition
Code8
Definition8
Source
Code Definition
Code7
Definition7
Source
Code Definition
Code5
Definition5
Source
Code Definition
Code4
Definition4
Source
Code Definition
Code3
Definition3
Source
Code Definition
Code2
Definition2
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1
Source
Code Definition
CodeRidge Top
DefinitionRidge Top
Source
Code Definition
CodeHW-Mid-Low
DefinitionHW-Mid-Low
Source
Code Definition
CodeHW-Low
DefinitionHW-Low
Source
Code Definition
CodeHW-Mid
DefinitionHW-Mid
Source
Code Definition
CodeHW-High
DefinitionHW-High
Source
Definitionany text
Definitionany text
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeRidge-Top
DefinitionLocated at the top ridge of the watershed.
Source
Code Definition
CodeMid-Low
DefinitionLocation between the mid and low elevation sites
Source
Code Definition
CodeLow
DefinitionLow elevation sampling location
Source
Code Definition
CodeMid
DefinitionMid-elevation sampling location
Source
Code Definition
CodeHigh
DefinitionHigh elevation sampling location
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codesapwood
DefinitionSapwood samples
Source
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitmicrogramPerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
Unitnumber
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
UnitnanomolePerGram
Precision0.01
Typereal
Definitionany text
Missing Value Code:                
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
Code-888.88
Expldata not available
Code-999.99
ExplSample not analyzed
 
Accuracy Report:                                                                                        
Accuracy Assessment:                                                                                        
Coverage:                                                                                        
Methods:                                                                                        

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study.

While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
Hubbard Brook Ecosystem StudyHBEF Watershed 1, HBEF Watershed 3, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Hubbard Brook LTER, inorganic ions, microbiome
LTER Network Controlled Vocabularyamino acids, biology, chemistry, chlorophyll, chlorophyll a, ecosystems, fertilization, forest ecology, plant physiology, population dynamics, soil chemistry, soil solution chemistry
LTER Network Core Research Areasdisturbance, inorganic nutrients, populations
ISO 19115 Topic Categorybiota
US Forest Service National Research & Development TaxonomyEcology, Ecosystems, & Environment, Plant ecology

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Sample Collections:

Foliage: foliar samples of red spruce [RS-CY = Current year (first year growth), RS-PY = Past year (second year growth], sugar maple, yellow birch, and American beech were collected from WS1 in locations close to the established lysimeter sites starting in 2000. Samples from the untreated reference site were collected starting in 2004. At both sites, samples were collected from mid to upper canopy by shot gun at three elevational zones designated as: low (500-550 m), mid (550-650 m) and high (650-740 m). Visually healthy needles or leaves were collected for each species (RS-10 trees/year); hardwoods (15 trees (5 trees/elevation/year) at reference site and 20-30 trees at Ca-treated site (5-10 trees/elevation/year). Dominant or co-dominant trees were selected for sampling from a population of 80-90 year-old trees. Needles were chopped into 2-3 mm size pieces using scissors. Disks, 4 mm in diameter were punched with a paper puncher from 2-4 leaves of each hardwood species, avoiding main veins. Two sub-samples were taken from each individual tree’s foliar collection. One sub-sample (approximately 200 mg FW) was placed in a pre-weighed microfuge tube that contained 5% perchloric acid (PCA). The other sub-sample (> 200 mg FW) was kept dry and all samples were transported to the laboratory on ice (Minocha et al. 2000). Samples were stored at -20 ºC until analyzed.

Sapwood plugs:

From 2005-2007 and then again in 2009, sapwood plugs from actively growing sapwood clear (no stained or rotten wood) were extracted from each tree using a drill and an increment hammer. Samples were taken at breast height, avoiding areas with obvious injury to the stem. Three sapwood plugs for broad hardwood trees and 4 for conifer trees were collected from different faces of each tree. A drill was used to first remove the bark and the cambial layer. A dead blow hammer was then used to drive the increment hammer into the exposed sapwood. A plunger was used to extract the sapwood plug into labeled Ziploc bags. Plugs were approximately 1.5 cm in length. Prior to processing, each plug was cut into 4-6 equal segments. After removing any extraneous materials such as bark or discolored wood, samples (~600 mg FW) were transferred into pre-weighed and labeled microfuge tubes. Following the addition of one mL of 5% PCA, samples were stored on ice in the field and frozen at -20oC in the lab until further analysis (Minocha et al. 2015; 2019).

Foliar and sapwood metabolic analyses:

Extractions: Soluble ions, free PAs and free AAs were extracted from the foliar and sapwood plug samples collected in 5% perchloric acid (PCA) by three freezing and thawing cycles according to procedures described previously (Minocha et al. 2000; Minocha et al. 1994). All samples were stored at -20 ºC until analysis. Separate analyses were performed for each individual tree sample.

Polyamines and Amino Acids:

Polyamines (2000-2004): Perchloric acid extracts were dansylated and quantified according to the procedure described in Minocha et al. (1990). A PerkinElmer (Norwalk, CT, USA) HPLC system consisting of Series 200 pump, autosampler and, LC 240 fluorescence detector with a 20 µl loop (10 µl injection volume) was used for quantification. A Pecosphere – 3 x 3 CR C18, 3 μm, 33 x 4.6 mm I.D. analytical column was used for the separation of PAs. Excitation and emission wavelengths were set at 340 and 510 nm, respectively. A Gilson (Middleton, WI, USA) 712 HPLC System Controller (version 1.2) was used to integrate the data.

Amino Acids (2000-2003): Amino acids data were collected starting in 1999 using PCA extracts that were dansylated and quantified according to the procedure described in Minocha and Long (2004) with a PerkinElmer Pecosphere Reduced Activity RP C18, 3µm, 100 x 4.6 mm analytical column.

Simultaneous polyamines and amino acids processing and quantification (2004-2015): Both PAs and AAs were simultaneously dansylated and quantified within a single run using the method described in Minocha and Long (2004). The dansylation reaction was terminated in these samples using L-asparagine (50 µL of 20 mg mL-1 in water) rather than Alanine (Ala), described in the original method. A new series 200 PerkinElmer HPLC system fitted with a Phenomenex (Torrance, CA, USA) SynergiTM Hydro-RP, 4 µm, 100 x 4.6 mm I.D. analytical column, a C18 SecurityguardTM, 5 µm, 4 x 3 mm I.D. cartridge guard column, and a PerkinElmer C18 Scavenger, 10 µm, 33 x 4.6 mm I.D. cartridge column was used. Excitation and emission wavelengths were set at 340 and 515 nm respectively. Data were integrated using TotalChrom HPLC software package (Perkin-Elmer, version 6.2.1).

Exchangeable Inorganic ions (soluble in 5% PCA):

Exchangeable Inorganic ions (2000-2015). The quantitation of soluble inorganic ions of Ca, Mg, Mn, K, Al and P (defined as the fraction of total ions within cells that is extractable in 5% PCA) was conducted using a simultaneous axial Inductively Coupled Plasma emission spectrophotometer (Vista CCD, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and Vista Pro software (version 4.0). Supernatants of 3x frozen and thawed samples in PCA were diluted (foliage 100x, sapwood plugs 50x) with distilled deionized water for estimation of soluble ions.

Sapwood plugs:

From 2005-2007 and then again in 2009, sapwood plugs from actively growing sapwood clear (no stained or rotten wood) were extracted from each tree using a drill and an increment hammer. Samples were taken at breast height, avoiding areas with obvious injury to the stem. Three sapwood plugs for broad hardwood trees and 4 for conifer trees were collected from different faces of each tree. A drill was used to first remove the bark and the cambial layer. A dead blow hammer was then used to drive the increment hammer into the exposed sapwood. A plunger was used to extract the sapwood plug into labeled Ziploc bags. Plugs were approximately 1.5 cm in length. Prior to processing, each plug was cut into 4-6 equal segments. After removing any extraneous materials such as bark or discolored wood, samples (~600 mg FW) were transferred into pre-weighed and labeled microfuge tubes. Following the addition of one mL of 5% PCA, samples were stored on ice in the field and frozen at -20oC in the lab until further analysis. Sapwood samples were processed for PA, AA and ion analysis as described above for foliage.

Related Publications:

Schaberg PG, Minocha R, Long S, Halman JM, Hawley GJ, Eagar C (2011) Calcium fertilization at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest increases the capacity for stress tolerance and carbon capture in red spruce (Picea rubens) trees during the cold season Trees 25:1053-1061

Minocha R, Long S, Thangavel P, Minocha SC, Eagar C, Driscoll CT (2010) Elevation dependent sensitivity of northern hardwoods to Ca addition at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH USA Forest Ecology and Management 260:2115-2125

Juice SM et al. (2006) Response of sugar maple to calcium addition to northern hardwood forest Ecology 87:1267-1280

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study
Address:
234 Mirror Lake Road,
North Woodstock, NH 03262 United States
Creators:
Individual: Rakesh Minocha
Email Address:
rakesh.minocha@usda.gov
Individual: Stephanie Long
Email Address:
stephanie.long2@usda.gov
Contacts:
Organization:Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study
Position:Information Manager
Address:
234 Mirror Lake Road,
North Woodstock, NH 03262 United States
Email Address:
hbr-im@lternet.edu
Web Address:
https://hubbardbrook.org

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2000-07-01
End:
2015-08-31
Geographic Region:
Description:Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest Watershed 1
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  43.959286Southern:  43.952053
Western:  -71.731339Eastern:  -71.726311
Geographic Region:
Description:Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest Watershed 3
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  43.962128Southern:  43.939945
Western:  -71.725502Eastern:  -71.687683

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Hubbard Brook Metabolic Studies
Personnel:
Individual: Rakesh Minocha
Role:principalInvestigator
Funding:

This work has been funded by the USDA Forest Service.

Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'microgramPerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'multiplierToSI' = '0.000001'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'microgramPerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = 'gramsPerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'massPerMass'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'micrograms per gram'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'abbreviation' = 'umole/g'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'constantToSI' = '0'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'micromolePerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'micromolePerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = 'molePerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'NA'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'a concentration unit used in oceanography. volume changes with depth, but mass does not. Not sure what the unitType should be.'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'abbreviation' = 'mg/Kg'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'milligramPerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'multiplierToSI' = '0.0001'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'milligramPerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = 'gram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'mass'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'amount of substance per mass'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'nanomolePerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'multiplierToSI' = ' '
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'nanomolePerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = 'molesPerKilogram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'amountOfSubstanceWeight'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'nanomoles per gram'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'number'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'number'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'dimensionless'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'a number'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo