Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Long-term measurements of microbial biomass and activity at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest 1994 – present

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:knb-lter-hbr.67.23
Title:Long-term measurements of microbial biomass and activity at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest 1994 – present
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

Long-term monitoring of soil nitrate (NO3-) and ammonium (NH4+) concentrations, microbial biomass carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) content, microbial respiration, potential nitrification and N mineralization rates, and denitrification potential has been ongoing at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest since 1994. Samples have been collected in the Bear Brook Watershed (west of Watershed 6) beginning in 1994. In 1998, our sampling regime was extended to Watershed 1 in an effort to monitor and quantify microbial response to a whole-watershed calcium addition.

These data were gathered as part of the Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study (HBES). The HBES is a collaborative effort at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, which is operated and maintained by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.

Publication Date:2020-12-23

Time Period
Begin:
1994-05-01
End:
2020-07-17

People and Organizations
Contact:Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study [  email ]
Creator:Groffman, Peter M (Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies)
Creator:Martel, Lisa D (Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
HubbardBrook_CalciumProject_MicrobialBiomass_1994-2020
Description:
Hubbard Brook Calcium Project Microbial Biomass and Activity
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-hbr/67/23/94e671a78765b3ae0fc38c9b8932a65c
Name:HubbardBrook_CalciumProject_MicrobialBiomass_1994-2020
Description:Hubbard Brook Calcium Project Microbial Biomass and Activity
Number of Records:4537
Number of Columns:18

Table Structure
Object Name:HubbardBrook_CalciumProject_MicrobialBiomass_1994-2020.csv
Size:488068 bytes
Authentication:1be78bbfe789ac35a0db68a495fd7b40 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 
Column Name:Project  
Date  
Year  
Se  
Treatment  
El  
Plot  
Hor  
BIOC  
RESPC  
BION  
NO3  
NH4  
NIT  
MIN  
DEA  
H2O  
pH  
Definition:Project nameSample dateYear of sample collectionSeasonTreatmentElevationSample locationSoil horizonMicrobial biomassSoil respiration rateMicrobial biomass NSoil nitrateSoil ammoniumPotential net nitrificationPotential net N mineralizationDenitrification enzyme activityGravimetric water content gram water Per gram wet soilpH
Storage Type:string  
date  
date  
string  
string  
string  
string  
string  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:nominaldateTimedateTimenominalnominalnominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
DefinitionProject name
FormatYYYY-MM-DD
Precision
FormatYYYY
Precision
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeF
DefinitionFall
Source
Code Definition
CodeW
DefinitionWinter
Source
Code Definition
CodeSp
DefinitionSpring
Source
Code Definition
CodeSu
DefinitionSummer
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeCalciumAddition
DefinitionWatershed 1
Source
Code Definition
CodeReference
DefinitionWest of Watershed 6; Bear Brook Watershed
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeSF
DefinitionSpruce/Fir, ~790m, SF (Bear Brook); Lysimeter Site #2 (WS1)
Source
Code Definition
CodeH
DefinitionHigh, ~750m, litter traps 101-120 (Bear Brook); Lysimeter #3 (WS1)
Source
Code Definition
CodeU
DefinitionUpper, ~675m, litter traps 121-140 (Bear Brook)
Source
Code Definition
CodeM
DefinitionMid, ~600m, litter traps 141-160 (Bear Brook); Lysimeter #4 (WS1)
Source
Code Definition
CodeL
DefinitionLow, ~525m, litter traps 161-180 (Bear Brook); Lysimeter #6 (WS1)
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeLT###
DefinitionLitter Trap # (Bear Brook only)
Source
Code Definition
CodeLY#-#
DefinitionLysimeter Site # - Plot Replicate # (WS1 only)
Source
Code Definition
CodeLY#
DefinitionLysimeter Site # (WS1 only)
Source
Code Definition
CodeSF#
DefinitionSpruce/Fir Site (Bear Brook Only)
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
CodeOi/Oe
DefinitionOi and Oe horizons combined
Source
Code Definition
CodeOa/A
DefinitionOa and A horizons combined
Source
Code Definition
CodeO
Definitionhe entire O horizon: Oi, Oe, and Oa combined
Source
Code Definition
CodeMin
DefinitionThe first 10 cm of mineral soil below the A horizon (E and/or B)
Source
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typereal
Min
Max215381.04 
UnitmilligramPerKilogramPerDay
Typereal
Min
Max5924.9 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typereal
Min-0.59 
Max2505.51 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typereal
Min-1.04 
Max167.8 
UnitmilligramPerKilogram
Typereal
Min-54.56 
Max583.24 
UnitmilligramPerKilogramPerDay
Typereal
Min-4.05 
Max77.69 
UnitmilligramPerKilogramPerDay
Typereal
Min-38.68 
Max108.18 
UnitmicrogramPerKilogramPerHour
Typereal
Min-63.09 
Max16806.83 
UnitgramPerGram
Typereal
Min0.12 
Max0.87 
UnitpH
Typereal
Min2.64 
Max6.87 
Missing Value Code:                
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Code-9999.99
ExplData missing or not taken at this time
Accuracy Report:                                    
Accuracy Assessment:                                    
Coverage:                                    
Methods:                                    

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data (\"Data User\" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available \"as is.\" The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
LTER Controlled Vocabularyecosystems, forests, watersheds, primary production, ammonium, carbon, denitrification, microbes, microbial biomass, microbial activity, microbial nitrogen, mineralization, nitrate, nitrification, nitrogen, respiration, soil
LTER Core Research Areadisturbance, inorganic nutrients
HBES VocabularyHBR, Hubbard Brook LTER, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study, HBES, HBEF, New Hampshire, NH, White Mountain National Forest, HBEF Watershed 1
ISO 19115 Topic Categorybiota
National Research & Development TaxonomyEcology, Ecosystems, & Environment
(No thesaurus)HBEF Bear Brook Watershed

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

LOCATION DESCRIPTION

We have initiated a long-term effort to monitor soil nitrate (NO3-) and ammonium (NH4+) concentrations, microbial biomass carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) content, microbial respiration, potential nitrification and N mineralization rates, and denitrification potential in the experimental watersheds at Hubbard Brook. In 1994 we began sampling in the Bear Brook Watershed (west of Watershed 6). In 1998, we added Watershed 1 to our sampling regime in an effort to monitor and quantify microbial response to a whole-watershed calcium addition.

In the Bear Brook Watershed we used the “west of watershed 6 litter trap transects” described by Hughes and Fahey (1994). These are four 100 m transects, 50 m apart with five traps per transect located at low, mid, upper and high elevations - 20 traps per elevation. We sampled within 1.5 m of five traps at each elevation. Litter quality, quantity and composition have been monitored on these transects since 1984. In 1997 we sampled at the upper and high elevations and also at four locations just above and to the west of Rain Gauge 9 in a mixed stand dominated by red spruce and balsam fir. In 1998 we began regularly sampling more extensively in the spruce/fir zone, and discontinued our sampling at the "upper" site. We sampled within 1.5 m of the center of each of 5 randomly chosen sites in this spruce/fir area. Vegetation in the Bear Brook Watershed is roughly equivalent to that in Watershed 6, which is an approximately 80 year old “reference” watershed dominated by northern hardwoods (American beech, sugar maple, yellow birch) at the lower elevations with moderate amounts of red spruce, balsam fir and white birch at the “high” elevation sites.

In Watershed 1 we sampled near a subset of the lysimeter sites established for the calcium addition study. Our sites included the "spruce/fir" Lysimeter Site 2 at the top of Watershed 1, the "high" Lysimeter Site 3, the "mid" Lysimeter Site 4, and the "low" Lysimeter Site 6. These site types and elevations correspond to those in the Bear Brook Watershed. At each lysimeter site we chose 5 replicate plots that were all within ~30 m of the center lysimeter stake. We revisited the same approximate plot during each sampling date. In 1999 we marked out 2 X 3 m plots in these areas, covered them during the helicopter wollastonite addition, then uncovered them and hand-applied wollastonite. We have sampled entirely within these marked plots since the application.

SAMPLING DESIGN

Samples were collected three times each year (note the above exceptions) to correspond with key plant phenological stages: pre-green, peak green, and senescence. Sampling dates were generally in May, July, and October. We also sampled once in December 1999, two months after the wollastonite addition, to determine if there were immediate responses to the calcium. In 1994, May and July 1995, May and July 1996, and from July 1998 to July 1999 we sampled soils using a bulb corer method. In October 1995 and 1996, all of 1997, and in May 1998 we used a pin block method. From May 2000 to 2010 we sampled using a split-PVC corer method. From May 2000 on we have sampled using a split-PVC corer method.

In the pin block method, long (13.2 cm) nails are driven through holes along the edge of a 15 X 15 cm square of ~1 cm plywood that has been placed on the forest floor. There are 4 holes on each side of the pin block. These nails firmly attach the block to the soil, and enclose a "box" of soil for sampling. We use a small saw to cut away roots and soil from the edge of the nails and from underneath the block. We then remove the soil contained by the block and the nails (15 X 15 X 13.2 cm). In 1997 Oe and Oa were collected as a single horizon, and mineral soil was discarded. In other years we separated the organic soil into two layers (Oi/Oe and Oa/A horizons), discarded the mineral soil from the pin block, and used a bulb corer to take a 10 cm mineral core directly under the (removed) soil block.

In the bulb corer method, a typical flower planting and gardening bulb corer is used. These corers are metal, have a handle on top, and have a diameter that gets slightly narrower from top to bottom. The diameter at the bottom of the corer we used is 6.5 cm. Typically, anywhere from 2-8 cores are taken at a given site, depending on horizon depth and density of soils. The corer is inserted 10 cm into the soil and removed with an intact core. The core is pushed out through the top of the corer onto a plastic sheet, where horizon depths are noted and horizons are separated. The mineral soil is discarded and the remaining soil is split into two layers (Oi/Oe and Oa/A horizons). Each layer is measured and placed into a sample bag, with all cores composited by horizon. To obtain a mineral sample we dig down to the first sign of mineral soil (E or B, depending on the site) and attempt to take a full 10 cm core. If it is not possible to obtain a full 10 cm mineral core we take 2-3 partial mineral cores and combine them.

In the split-PVC corer method, a 5 cm diameter split PVC corer is used to take all samples. A split PVC corer consists of a piece of 2 inch (5 cm) PVC pipe, about 15-20 cm long, split lengthwise on both sides. The corer is actually in two pieces. We put the corer together along the cuts, and duct-tape one side -- the "hinge" side. Holding the corer firmly together, we hammer it 10-15cm into the ground. The corer is removed and then opened with the intact soil core inside. The soil is split into three layers (Oi/Oe, Oa/A, and mineral horizons). Each horizon is measured and placed into a sample bag. We typically collect 2-8 cores per site, compositing all cores by horizon.

DATA DESCRIPTION

In most cases, Oi and Oe horizons were composited into one sample, as were Oa and A horizons. Mineral samples generally consist of the top 10 cm of mineral soil beginning below the A horizon. In 1994 and May and July 1995, only Oi/Oe and Oa/A horizons were sampled. In 1997 only Oe and Oa horizons were collected, and they were composited into one sample. Samples are either collected once (July) or three times a year (May, July, and October). Samples were also collected in December 1999.

NOTE ON OUTLIERS IN THE DATA SET

All outliers were left in the data set unless it was evident that there was a contamination or laboratory procedure problem. In 2005, at the W1 high site, rep 3 of the Oi/Oe sample had biomass C, Respiration, Biomass N, Nitrification, Mineralization and DEA that were values that were, in some cases, 10 times higher than the next highest value. It was determined that since this pattern was evident in multiple lab analyses it was not due to laboratory errors, and must represent a "hot spot" of activity in the soil. These data were left in the dataset. In 2001, at the Bear Brook high elevation site, the mineral horizon had extremely high NH4 levels. This mean is the result of 5 data points, 2 of which were very high. These data were also left in the dataset.

LABORATORY PROCEDURES

Samples were stored at 4o C between sampling and analysis (from less than 1 week to up to three weeks). From 1994 to 1996 soils were sieved (>4 mm). From 1997 to 2010 soils were manually homogenized: all large rocks, roots, and other non-decomposed organic material were removed, and samples were thoroughly mixed. No more than three minutes were spent homogenizing any sample. All samples were held at field moisture before analysis. Soil water content was determined gravimetrically.

Microbial biomass C and N content was measured using the chloroform fumigation-incubation method (Jenkinson and Powlson 1976). Soils were fumigated to kill and lyse microbial cells in the sample. The fumigated sample was inoculated with fresh soil and sealed in a jar, and microorganisms from the fresh soil grew vigorously using the killed cells as substrate. The flushes of carbon dioxide (CO2) and 2 M KCl extractable inorganic N (NH4+ and NO3-) released by the actively growing cells during a 10-day incubation at field moisture content were assumed to be directly proportional to the amount of C and N in the microbial biomass of the original sample. A proportionality constant (0.41) was used to calculate biomass C from the CO2 flush in the fumigated samples. Biomass N is the total inorganic N flush in the fumigated samples.

Inorganic N and CO2 production were also measured in "control" samples. Control samples were prepared in the same fashion as those listed above, but were not fumigated. These incubations provided estimates of microbial respiration and potential net N mineralization and nitrification. Microbial respiration was quantified from the amount of CO2 evolved over the 10-day incubation. Potential net N mineralization and nitrification were quantified from the accumulation of NH4+ plus NO3- and NO3- alone during the 10-day incubation. We measured 2 M KCl extractable inorganic N in the fresh soil samples to determine the initial soil NO3- and NH4+ concentrations. Carbon dioxide was measured by thermal conductivity gas chromatography. Inorganic N was measured colorometerically using an autoanalyzer.

Denitrification enzyme activity was measured using the short-term anaerobic assay described by Smith and Tiedje (1979). Sieved soils were amended with NO3- (100 mg N kg-1), dextrose or glucose (40 mg kg-1), chloramphenicol (10 mg kg-1) and acetylene (10 kPa) and were incubated under anaerobic conditions for 90 minutes. Gas samples were taken at 30 and 90 minutes, stored in evacuated glass tubes and analyzed for N2O by electron capture gas chromatography. For more information on any of the methods described above, refer to Robertson et al. (1999).

Soil pH was measured by weighing 10 g of soil at field moisture into a small beaker. 20 ml of deionized water was added and swirled to make a slurry. After 30 minutes the pH of the slurry was measured using a pH meter calibrated using pH 4 and pH 7 buffers.

CALCULATIONS

All results are expressed on a per gram of dry soil basis. Values can be converted to a “per area” basis using data on the mass of different soil horizons found elsewhere on the data page of this website.

REFERENCES

Jenkinson, D. S., and D. S. Powlson. 1976. "The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil – V: A method for measuring soil biomass. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 8:209-213.

Robertson, G.P., C.S. Bledsoe, D.C. Coleman and P. Sollins, editors. 1999. Standard Soil Methods for Long Term Ecological Research. Oxford University Press, New York.

Smith, M.S., and J. M. Tiedje. 1979. Phases of denitrification following oxygen depletion in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 11:262-267.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@environmentaldatainitiative.org
Web Address:
https://environmentaldatainitiative.org
Creators:
Individual: Peter M Groffman
Organization:Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Email Address:
groffmanp@caryinstitute.org
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-6255
Individual: Lisa D Martel
Organization:Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Email Address:
martell@caryinstitute.org
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0156-4954
Contacts:
Organization:Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study
Email Address:
hbr-im@lternet.edu

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
1994-05-01
End:
2020-07-17
Geographic Region:
Description:Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  43.959Southern:  43.914
Western:  -71.8062Eastern:  -71.7022
Geographic Region:
Description:HBEF watershed 1 (WS1)
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  43.957001Southern:  43.949928
Western:  -71.731339Eastern:  -71.726311
Geographic Region:
Description:Bear Brook Watershed, adjacent to HBEF watershed 6
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  43.959286Southern:  43.952053
Western:  -71.743462Eastern:  -71.735649

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Long-Term Ecological Research at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (1988)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 8702331
Related Project:
Title:Long-term Ecological Research (LTER) at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (1992)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 9211768
Related Project:
Title:LTER: Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (1998)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 9810221
Related Project:
Title:Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (HBR-LTER) (2005)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 0423259
Related Project:
Title:Long-Term Ecological Research at Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (2010)
Personnel:
Individual: Timothy Fahey
Organization:Cornell University
Email Address:
tjf5@cornell.edu
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1162
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 1114804
Related Project:
Title:LTER: Long Term Ecological Research at the Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (2016)
Personnel:
Individual: Gary Lovett
Organization:Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies
Email Address:
lovettg@caryinstitute.org
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8411-8027
Role:Principal Investigator
Funding: National Science Foundation (NSF) 1637685

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:complete
Frequency:
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'pH'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'pH'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = ''
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = ''
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'pH'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'milligramPerKilogram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'milligramPerKilogram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = ''
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = ''
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'milligramPerKilogram'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'milligramPerKilogramPerDay'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'milligramPerKilogramPerDay'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = ''
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = ''
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'milligramPerKilogramPerDay'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'microgramPerKilogramPerHour'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'microgramPerKilogramPerHour'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = ''
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = ''
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'microgramPerKilogramPerHour'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'gramPerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'gramPerGram'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = ''
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = ''
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'gramPerGram'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo