Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Aggregate mesquite litter chemistry following soil-mixing and decomposition in a semi-arid grassland at the Jornada Basin LTER, 2010-2012

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:knb-lter-jrn.210301001.62
Title:Aggregate mesquite litter chemistry following soil-mixing and decomposition in a semi-arid grassland at the Jornada Basin LTER, 2010-2012
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

This dataset contains litter carbon content, nitrogen content, and associated chemistry data from a litter decomposition experiment at the Jornada Basin LTER in 2010 to 2012. To assess the role of soil-litter mixing (SLM) in aridland litter decomposition, litterbags were deployed in the Chihuahuan Desert and interrelationships between vegetation structure, SLM, and rates of decomposition were quantified. To assess the role of vegetation structure, litterbags were deployed in contrasting vegetation microsites, including grass, shrub, and bare ground microsites. This dataset contains litter chemistry data from the experiment including percent carbon, percent nitrogen, ash corrections, and the carbon to nitrogen ratio of litter in recovered bags. This study is complete.

Publication Date:2021-12-16
Language:English
For more information:
Visit: https://jrn.lternet.edu
Visit: DOI PLACE HOLDER

Time Period
Begin:
2010-04-19
End:
2012-10-31

People and Organizations
Contact:Jornada Basin LTER Information Manager (Jornada Basin LTER) [  email ]
Creator:Hewins, Daniel (New Mexico State University)
Creator:Archer, Steven (The University of Arizona)
Creator:Throop, Heather (Arizona State University)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
Mesquite litter chemistry data
Description:
Carbon, nitrogen, and combustion data from mesquite litter samples
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-jrn/210301001/62/402c118ac26602b2ec21b1ca86d5d590
Name:Mesquite litter chemistry data
Description:Carbon, nitrogen, and combustion data from mesquite litter samples
Number of Records:290
Number of Columns:13

Table Structure
Object Name:JRN301001_AggMesq_litter_chem_data.csv
Size:19138 byte
Authentication:05cff7dceacea4ef710a205612e1b6e3 Calculated By MD5
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Number of Foot Lines:0
Record Delimiter:\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,
Quote Character:"

Table Column Descriptions
 YearMonthBlockPlotSite coverCollection monthReplicateCorrected nitrogenCorrected carbonPercent ashAsh-corrected nitrogenAsh-corrected carbonC:N ratio
Column Name:year  
month  
block  
plot  
microsite  
duration  
rep  
N_corr  
C_corr  
pash  
ashN  
ashC  
CN_ratio  
Definition:Year of litterbag collection from fieldMonth of litterbag collection [ 4=April, 5=May, 10=October ]Block location in JER Pasture 11 A north to south [1-3]Replicate plot within the block [1-3]Dominant land cover where litter bags were placed (Bare, Shrub, or Grass)Collection month after litterbag deployment (# months deployed)Sample replicate [1 or 2]Percent (%) nitrogen corrected by LECO standardsPercent (%) carbon corrected by LECO standardsPercent (%) ash finalPercent (%) ash-corrected nitrogen [ ashN = N_corr + (N_corr x pash) ]Percent (%) ash-corrected carbon [ ashC = C_corr + (C_corr x pash) ]Ratio of carbon to nitrogen [ CN = ashC/ashN ]
Storage Type:dateTime  
dateTime  
integer  
integer  
string  
integer  
integer  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
float  
Measurement Type:dateTimedateTimenominalnominalnominalnominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
FormatYYYY
Precision1
FormatMM
Precision1
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1
DefinitionBlock 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2
DefinitionBlock 2
Source
Code Definition
Code3
DefinitionBlock 3
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1
DefinitionPlot 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2
DefinitionPlot 2
Source
Code Definition
Code3
DefinitionPlot 3
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Codebare
DefinitionBare ground
Source
Code Definition
Codegrass
DefinitionGrass cover
Source
Code Definition
Codeshrub
DefinitionShrub cover
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code0
Definition0 months (t0)
Source
Code Definition
Code1
Definition1 months (t1)
Source
Code Definition
Code12
Definition12 months (t12)
Source
Code Definition
Code24
Definition24 months (t24)
Source
Code Definition
Code30
Definition30 months (t30)
Source
Code Definition
Code6
Definition6 months (t6)
Source
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1
DefinitionReplicate 1
Source
Code Definition
Code2
DefinitionReplicate 2
Source
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Unitpercent
Typereal
Missing Value Code:                    
CodeNA
ExplMissing value - data not collected or otherwise unavailable
CodeNA
ExplMissing value - data not collected or otherwise unavailable
CodeNA
ExplMissing value - data not collected or otherwise unavailable
Accuracy Report:                          
Accuracy Assessment:                          
Coverage:                          
Methods:                          

Data Package Usage Rights

This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
LTER Core Research Areasinorganic nutrients, organic matter
LTER Controlled Vocabulary v1LTER, carbon cycling, carbon to nitrogen ratio, decomposition, leaf litter, litter, litter decomposition, litterbags, nitrogen, nitrogen cycling, nutrient cycling, organic matter
noneLTER, Prosopsis, exclosure, mesquite
Jornada Basin LTER dataset keywordsAeolian (Wind Related)
Jornada Basin project namesstudy 301
Jornada Basin place namesJER, Pasture 11A

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Initial notes on site and experimental design

Some metadata has been lost for this study. Below are the best approximations of the methods taken from publications, particularly Hewins et al (2017) listed below.

The field experiment was conducted at the Jornada Experimental Range (JER), near the northern terminus of the Chihuahuan Desert biome and approximately 40 km NE of Las Cruces, New Mexico, USA.

We worked in replicate (n = 3) 2.25 ha livestock exclosures (hereafter blocks) established in 2004 (Li et al. 2007). The center point for these blocks was located at 32.563°, -106.760°(lat./long.), and the three blocks were spaced approximately 1 km apart. Within each block we established replicate (n = 3) plots (50 9 30 m) separated by at least 25 m. Within each plot, we randomly designated a grass, a shrub, and a bare ground patch (hereafter microsites) for litterbag placement. Microsites were at least 10 m apart and at least 3 m downwind of any large shrubs ([0.5 m tall) to avoid wake effects (Okin 2008). Grass microsites were shrub-free and dominated by B. eriopoda or S. flexuosus. Shrub microsites consisted of a single mature P. glandulosa plant with no or minimal sub-canopy vegetation. Bare ground microsites consisted of exposed soil lacking vegetation. Microsites encompassed a minimum of 3 m2, with exact size dependent on vegetation structure. Our field sites were located on the 'sand sheet' geomorphic surface at the JER. Surface soil texture in each block was classified as very sandy (95% sand, 5% silt and clay; Li et al. 2007).

Published methods

Decomposition was quantified for leaflets of P. glandulosa, a native, deciduous N2-fixing shrub that now dominates former grasslands in the Chihuahuan Desert and southern Great Plains of North America. Leaflets were collected prior to abscission on 19–20 November 2009 and immediately air dried at 30 °C for 5 days.

Litterbags were filled with 2 g of leaflets. Empty mesh bags served as a control in each microsite to assess aggregate formation in the absence of litter. Litterbags were deployed on 19 April 2010 and retrieved after 0, 1, 6, 12, 24, and 30 months. Litterbags were arrayed along transects oriented perpendicular to the prevailing erosive winds (originating from the southwesterly direction 79% of the time; Li et al. 2007). Litterbags in grass and shrub microsites were placed below canopies, where litter typically accumulates. Litterbags were affixed to the soil surface with steel sod staples and spaced at least 30 cm apart to minimize effects of neighboring bags on surface soil movement. We deployed 162 P. glandulosa litterbags (N = 3 blocks x 3 plots/block x 3 microsites/plot x 6 collection dates/microsite) and 54 empty litterbags (N = 3 blocks x 1 plot/block x 3 microsites/plot x 6 collection dates/microsite). Litterbags were stored at -20 °C immediately following retrieval from the field.

Litterbag contents (litter + accumulated soil) were separated using a 1 mm mesh sieve. Litter was then manually dusted using small brushes to remove additional soil from leaflets. The brushed litter was frozen at -80 degrees C for 48 h, lyophilized for 48 h, weighed, and then ground to a fine powder using a ball mill (8000D Mixer/Mill, Spex Certiprep, Metuchen, NJ, USA). Subsamples of litter were combusted at 550 degrees C for 6 h to determine the inorganic matter content (% ash). Mass loss and litter C and N content (elemental analyzer; ECS 4010, Costech Analytical Technologies, Valencia, CA, USA) are expressed on an ash-free basis. The % ash was also used as a conservative index of soil accumulation that accounts only for soil adhering to litter surfaces after sieving and brushing (see Throop and Archer 2007). A large proportion of soil that infiltrates litterbags covers or mixes with litter, but does not adhere to litter surface. The mass of these bulk soils entering or exiting litterbags is responsive to wind and water transport processes and is thus likely highly dynamic relative to that of the soil-litter films that form on litter surfaces. Quantifying the magnitude and dynamics of this bulk component of the soil-litter matrix was beyond the scope of this study.

References

Hewins, Daniel B., Robert L. Sinsabaugh, Steven R. Archer, and Heather L. Throop. "Soil–litter mixing and microbial activity mediate decomposition and soil aggregate formation in a sandy shrub-invaded Chihuahuan Desert grassland." Plant ecology 218, no. 4 (2017): 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-017-0703-4

Throop, Heather L., and Steven R. Archer. "Interrelationships among shrub encroachment, land management, and litter decomposition in a semidesert grassland." Ecological Applications 17, no. 6 (2007): 1809-1823.

People and Organizations

Publishers:
Organization:Environmental Data Initiative
Email Address:
info@environmentaldatainitiative.org
Web Address:
https://environmentaldatainitiative.org
Id:https://ror.org/0330j0z60
Creators:
Individual: Daniel Hewins
Organization:New Mexico State University
Address:
,
Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003 U.S.A.
Individual: Steven Archer
Organization:The University of Arizona
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-4129
Individual: Heather Throop
Organization:Arizona State University
Id:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7963-4342
Contacts:
Organization:Jornada Basin LTER
Position:Jornada Basin LTER Information Manager
Address:
P.O. Box 30003, MSC 3JER New Mexico State University,
Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003 USA
Phone:
575-646-1739
Email Address:
jornada.data@nmsu.edu
Web Address:
https://lter.jornada.nmsu.edu/information-management/
Metadata Providers:
Organization:Jornada Basin LTER
Address:
P.O. Box 30003; MSC 3JER New Mexico State University,
Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003 USA
Web Address:
https://lter.jornada.nmsu.edu

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
2010-04-19
End:
2012-10-31
Geographic Region:
Description:Sand Sheet: Study occurred in the sand sheet geomorphic zone in the Jornada Basin. More precise geographic coordinates for this study may be requested from the JRN LTER Data Manager (jornada.data@nmsu.edu).
Bounding Coordinates:
Northern:  32.752157Southern:  32.611234
Western:  -106.844154Eastern:  -106.601697

Project

Parent Project Information:

Title:Jornada Basin LTER
Personnel:
Individual:Dr. Debra Peters
Address:
P.O. Box 30003, MSC 3JER,
New Mexico State University,
Las Cruces, NM 88003-8003 United States
Phone:
575-646-1739 (voice)
Email Address:
dpeters.jrn.lter@gmail.com
Role:Principal Investigator
Abstract:

The Jornada Basin Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) program is part of a national network of long-term ecological research sites funded by the US National Science Foundation (NSF). The Jornada LTER program has been continuously funded since 1982 to develop general principles governing changes between grassland and shrubland ecosystems based on long-term data collected in the Chihuahuan Desert. We translate our findings to dryland ecosystems around the world, and forecast the dynamics of future ecosystem states in response to changing climate and land use.

Funding:

JRN is funded by the National Science Foundation under award DEB 0618120.

Maintenance

Maintenance:
Description:completed
Frequency:notPlanned
Other Metadata

Additional Metadata

additionalMetadata
        |___text '\n    '
        |___element 'metadata'
        |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___element 'unitList'
        |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___element 'unit'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'abbreviation' = '%'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'id' = 'percent'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'multiplierToSI' = '1'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'name' = 'percent'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'parentSI' = 'dimensionless'
        |     |     |     |  \___attribute 'unitType' = 'dimensionless'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n          '
        |     |     |     |___element 'description'
        |     |     |     |     |___text 'percent, one part per hundred parts. a decimal ratio multipled by 100'
        |     |     |     |___text '\n        '
        |     |     |___text '\n      '
        |     |___text '\n    '
        |___text '\n  '

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo