Data Package Metadata   View Summary

Spatial and temporal differences in shrimp numbers (1 year, 20 pools)

General Information
Data Package:
Local Identifier:knb-lter-luq.55.347979
Title:Spatial and temporal differences in shrimp numbers (1 year, 20 pools)
Alternate Identifier:DOI PLACE HOLDER
Abstract:

We added woody debris to stream pools in three streams in an experiment designed to increase cover for freshwater shrimp. We trapped four species of freshwater shrimp during 4 months following wood additions. Stream pool morphology was estimated using maximum depth, surface area, and volume.

Publication Date:2010-03-22
Language:English

Time Period
Begin:
1995-02-01
End:
1995-05-01

People and Organizations
Contact:Covich, Alan  [  email ]
Creator:Pyron, Mark 
Associate:Melendez-Colom, Eda (University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus, data manager)

Data Entities
Data Table Name:
Shrimp and pool data(Feb - May 1995)
Description:
Shrimp and pool data(Feb - May 1995)
Detailed Metadata

Data Entities


Data Table

Data:https://pasta-s.lternet.edu/package/data/eml/knb-lter-luq/55/347979/530b4f561a89e7490140c18e83b0f432
Name:Shrimp and pool data(Feb - May 1995)
Description:Shrimp and pool data(Feb - May 1995)
Number of Records:39
Number of Columns:16

Time Period
Begin:
1995-02-01
End:
1995-05-01

Table Structure
Object Name:ShrimpsandPoolraw.csv
Size:2190
Text Format:
Number of Header Lines:1
Number of Foot Lines:0
Record Delimiter:\r\n
Orientation:column
Simple Delimited:
Field Delimiter:,

Table Column Descriptions
 Pool NumberStream NumberWoody debris treatmentAverage number ofAtyashrimps per trapAverage number ofXiphophorusshrimps per trapAverage number ofSmall Macrobrachiumshrimps per trapAverage number ofLarge Macrobrachiumshrimps per trapMaximum depthSurface areaPool volumeBoulder scoreRock scoreGravel scoreSilt scoreLeaves scoreCurrent estimate
Column Name:Pool #  
STREAM  
TREAT  
ATYA  
XIPH  
SMMAC  
LGMAC  
MAXDEP  
AREA  
VOL  
BOULDER  
ROCK  
GRAVEL  
SILT  
LEAVES  
CURRENT  
Definition:A numeric, integer, identifier used to designate the pool where samples were collectedA number that identifies the stream samples were collectedCode representing the addition ( placed parallel to flow) or not of woody debris to the monitored pool. There are no missing data.Average number ofAtya(Atya lanipes Holthuis) shrimps trapped in the pool for the entire period. There are no missing data.Average number ofXiphophorus(Xiphocaris elongata-Guérin-Méneville-) shrimps trapped in the pool for the entire period. There are no missing data.Average number ofSmall (less than or equal to 25 mm carapacelength) Macrobrachium(M. carcinus -Linnaeus-and M. crenulatum Holthuis) shrimps trapped in the pool for the entire period. There are no missing data.Average number oflarge (greater than 25 mm carapacelength) Macrobrachium (M. carcinus -Linnaeus-and M. crenulatum Holthuis)shrimps trapped in the pool for the entire period. There are no missing data.Maximum depth of pool. There are no missing data.Pool surface area; calculated by summing theproducts of width transects and the average lengths ofeach width transect. (Pool widths were measured at 0.5 m intervals; 2–5 depths along each width transect and maximum depth). There are no missing data.Pool volume; calculated bymultiplying surface area by mean depth.There are no missing data.Estimatedboulder ( greater 20 cm diameter)composition of substrata within the pool by placinga finger on the substrata at 25 inspection pointsdistributed widely within each pool; assigning it as boulder and then converting the total of boulder points in the pool to a percentage. There are no missing data.Estimated cobble ( less 20; greater 5 cm diameter)composition of substrata within the pool by placinga finger on the substrata at 25 inspection pointsdistributed widely within each pool; assigning it as cobble and then converting the total of cobble points in the pool to a percentage. There are no missing data.Estimated gravel ( less 5 cm diameter) composition of substrata within the pool by placinga finger on the substrata at 25 inspection pointsdistributed widely within each pool; assigning it as gravel and then converting the total of gravel points in the pool to a percentage. There are no missing dataEstimated silt (finesediment) composition of substrata within the pool by placinga finger on the substrata at 25 inspection pointsdistributed widely within each pool; assigning it as silt and then converting the total of silt points in the pool to a percentage. There are no missing dataEstimated leaves composition of substrata within the pool by placinga finger on the substrata at 25 inspection pointsdistributed widely within each pool; assigning it as leaves and then converting the total of leaves points in the pool to a percentage. The percent of the substrata covered by leaves was estimated and placed into 10 categories. There are no missing dataCurrent velocity (seconds for fluorescein dye to movethe pool length; divided by the pool length). There are no missing data.
Storage Type:   string  
string  
                         
Measurement Type:rationominalnominalratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratioratio
Measurement Values Domain:
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
DefinitionA number that identifies the stream samples were collected
Allowed Values and Definitions
Enumerated Domain 
Code Definition
Code1
DefinitionWood addition
Source
Code Definition
Code0
DefinitionNo addition
Source
Unitdimensionless
Precision0.1
Typereal
Unitdimensionless
Precision0.1
Typereal
Unitdimensionless
Precision0.1
Typereal
Unitdimensionless
Precision0.1
Typereal
Unitcentimeter
Precision0.1
Typereal
UnitsquareMeter
Precision0.1
Typereal
UnitcubicMeter
Typereal
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
Unitdimensionless
Typereal
UnitcentimetersPerSecond
Typereal
Missing Value Code:            
Codenone
ExplMissing Value
Codenone
ExplMissing Value
Codenone
ExplMissing Value
Codenone
ExplMissing Value
Codenone
ExplMissing Value
Codenone
ExplMissing Value
       
Accuracy Report:                                
Accuracy Assessment:                                
Coverage:                                
Methods:                                

Data Package Usage Rights

Data Policies

LTER Network Data Access Policy, Data Access Requirements, and General Data Use Agreement
approved by the LTER Coordinating Committee April 6, 2005

Long Term Ecological Research Network Data Access Policy

The LTER data policy includes three specific sections designed to express shared network policies regarding the release of LTER data products, user registration for accessing data, and the licensing agreements specifying the conditions for data use.

LTER Network Data Release Policy

Data and information derived from publicly funded research in the U.S. LTER Network, totally or partially from LTER funds from NSF, Institutional Cost-Share, or Partner Agency or Institution where a formal memorandum of understanding with LTER has been established, are made available online with as few restrictions as possible, on a nondiscriminatory basis. LTER Network scientists should make every effort to release data in a timely fashion and with attention to accurate and complete metadata.

Data[current-user:created]

There are two data types:

Type I – data are to be released to the general public according to the terms of the general data use agreement (see Section 3 below) within 2 years from collection and no later than the publication of the main findings from the dataset and,

Type II - data are to be released to restricted audiences according to terms specified by the owners of the data. Type II data are considered to be exceptional and should be rare in occurrence. The justification for exceptions must be well documented and approved by the lead PI and Site Data Manager. Some examples of Type II data restrictions may include: locations of rare or endangered species, data that are covered under prior licensing or copyright (e.g., SPOT satellite data), or covered by the Human Subjects Act. Researchers that make use of Type II Data may be subject to additional restrictions to protect any applicable commercial or confidentiality interests.

While the spirit of this document is to promote maximum availability for ecological data in either Type I or II status, there are criteria by which priority for data release may be determined. Primary observations collected for core research activities directly supported by LTER research must receive the highest priority for data release. Data collected by other sources to which LTER supported research has added value is also a high priority Other types of data including non-LTER data that was acquired for LTER research, student thesis data, schoolyard LTER data, or legacy data that already suffer from inadequate documentation or format obsolescence may be ranked a lower priority by a site with justifications provided in their data management policy. Finally, some data may be determined of lowest priority for archiving on the grounds that they are interim data that led to final products that carry the scientific value. These might include data files created during stages within an analytic workflow, raw or replicate data values that were subsequently aggregated or processed for release, or individual outputs from stochastic models.

Metadata

Metadata documenting archived/online data sets of all types listed above will be made available when, or before, the dataset itself is released according to the terms above.
All metadata will be publicly available regardless of any restrictions on access to the data.
All metadata will follow LTER recommended standards and will minimally contain adequate information on proper citation, access, contact information, and discovery. Complete information including methods, structure, semantics, and quality control/assurance is expected for most datasets and is strongly encouraged.
LTER Network Data Access Requirements

The access to all LTER data is subject to requirements set forth by this policy document to enable data providers to track usage, evaluate its impact in the community, and confirm users' acceptance of the terms of acceptable use. These requirements are standardized across the LTER Network to provide contractual exchange of data between Site Data Providers, Network Data Providers, and Data Users that can be encoded into electronic form and exchanged between computers. This will allow direct access to data via a common portal once these requirements have been fulfilled. The following information may be required directly or by proxy prior to the transference of any data object:

Registration

1. Name

2. Affiliation

3. Email Address

4. Full Contact Information

Acceptance of the General Public Use Agreement or Restricted Data Use Agreement, as applicable.
A Statement of Intended Use that is compliant with the above agreements. Such statements may be made submitted explicitly or made implicitly via the data access portal interface.

General Data Use Agreement

LUQ  data and metadata is released under public domain:  CC BY – Attribution.

Conditions of Use

The consumer of these data (“Data User” herein) has an ethical obligation to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or coauthorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available “as is.” The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.
Disclaimer

While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and documentation contained in this Data Set, complete accuracy of data and metadata cannot be guaranteed. All data and metadata are made available "as is". The Data User holds all parties involved in the production or distribution of the Data Set harmless for damages resulting from its use or interpretation.[current-user:name]

Keywords

By Thesaurus:
Core Areaspopulations
LTER Controlled Vocabularyecosystems, aquatic ecosystems, streams, organisms, animals, invertebrates, aquatic invertebrates

Methods and Protocols

These methods, instrumentation and/or protocols apply to all data in this dataset:

Methods and protocols used in the collection of this data package
Description:

Shrimp were trapped monthly for four months following woody debris additions in February 1995. Stream pools were selected, woody debris added to half of pools, and shrimp were monitored in three streams: Prieta (15 pools), Bisley 3 (12 pools) and Bisley 5 (12 pools).

People and Organizations

Creators:
Individual: Mark Pyron
Address:
Department of Biology Ball State University Cooper Life Science Building, CL 121,
Muncie, IN 47306 US
Phone:
(765) 285-8820 (voice)
Phone:
(765) 285-8804 (facsimile)
Email Address:
mpyron@bsu.edu
Web Address:
http://web.bsu.edu/biology/faculty/pyron.htm
Contacts:
Individual: Alan Covich
Address:
Ecology Building Room 139 Institute of Ecology, Odum School of Ecology University of Georgia,
Athens, GA 30602 US
Phone:
(706) 542-6006 (voice)
Phone:
(706) 542-4819 (facsimile)
Email Address:
acovich@lternet.edu
Associated Parties:
Individual: Eda Melendez-Colom
Organization:University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras Campus
Address:
University of Puerto Rico at Rio Piedras, Ponce de Leon Ave.,
San Juan, PR 00931 US
Phone:
(787) 764-0000 (voice)
Email Address:
edacorreo@yahoo.com
Role:data manager

Temporal, Geographic and Taxonomic Coverage

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to all data in this dataset:

Time Period
Begin:
1995-02-01
End:
1995-05-01
Sampling Site: 
Description:Location is at: Puerto Rico 988, El Yunque National Forest, Luquillo, 00773, Puerto Rico, 1.0 km N.Location (Bisley Watershed 3 Centroid) extracted from the Luquillo Critical Zone Observatory (LCZO)  web page: https://www.sas.upenn.edu/lczodata/map/node
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -65.7438Latitude (degree): 18.3129
Altitude (meter):218
Sampling Site: 
Description:Location is at: Puerto Rico 988 El Yunque National Forest, Luquillo, 00773, Puerto Rico 739 m N. Location (Bisley Watersheds Centroid) extracted from the Luquillo Critical Zone Observatory (LCZO)  web page: https://www.sas.upenn.edu/lczodata/content/bisley-watersheds
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -65.7443Latitude (degree): 18.3138
Sampling Site: 
Description:upstream the Ox-cart Trail on Quebrada Prieta
Site Coordinates:
Longitude (degree): -65.8184Latitude (degree): 18.3225
Altitude (meter):351

Temporal, Geographic and/or Taxonomic information that applies to Data Table: Shrimp and pool data(Feb - May 1995)


Time Period
Begin:
1995-02-01
End:
1995-05-01

Project

Other Metadata

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo