This data package was submitted to a staging environment for testing purposes only. Use of these data for anything other than testing is strongly discouraged.

Data Package Summary    View Full Metadata

  • Relyea, R. A. 2000. Trait-mediated indirect effects in larval anurans: Reversing competition with the threat of predation. Ecology 81:2278-2289.
  • Relyea, Rick A.; Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
  • 2024-06-28
  • Relyea, R.A. 2024. Relyea, R. A. 2000. Trait-mediated indirect effects in larval anurans: Reversing competition with the threat of predation. Ecology 81:2278-2289. ver 1. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/DOI_PLACE_HOLDER (Accessed 2024-12-27).
  • Ecologists recently have been focusing on the role that trait-mediated indirect

    effects can have on community structure and composition. To date, this work has primarily

    focused on the effects of predator-induced behavioral plasticity on communities. However,

    predator-induced morphological plasticity, which has been documented in many taxa, might

    also lead to trait-mediated indirect effects. Here, I examined how predators altered the

    behavior and morphology of larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) and leopard frogs (R.

    pipiens) and how these phenotypic changes altered the outcome of competition between

    the two species.

    Competition in the absence of caged predators was asymmetric; when reared separately,

    leopard frogs grew more than wood frogs, but when competing (without predators), wood

    frogs grew faster than leopard frogs. The presence of caged predators reversed the outcome

    of competition between the two anuran prey. In the presence of larval dragonflies (Anax

    spp.) or caged mudminnows (Umbra limi), leopard frogs grew faster than wood frogs while

    total tadpole biomass production remained unchanged. Thus, there was a predator-mediated

    indirect effect.

    Because predators alter both the behavior and morphology of larval anurans and both

    of these traits are known to affect resource consumption and growth, both are potential

    mechanisms to explain the change in competitive outcome. Changes in behavior were not

    related to changes in growth, but changes in morphology (specifically mouth width and

    tail length) were related to changes in growth. When competitors were added (without

    predators), wood frogs increased their mouth width by 10% and their tail length by 3%,

    while leopard frogs increased their mouth width by 5% and did not change their tail length.

    The greater increase in mouth width for wood frogs should increase their forage intake,

    since tadpoles feed by scraping periphyton; the importance of a 3% longer tail in competitive

    ability is unknown. The presence of the predator threat (via chemical cues from the caged

    predators) reduced both the mouth width and tail length in the two prey species to precompetition

    levels. This response corresponded with the reduced competitive ability of the

    wood frogs. This work demonstrates that both competitors and predators can alter prey

    morphology and suggests that changes in morphology can cause trait-mediated indirect

    effects.

  • N: 42.458391      S: 42.458391      E: -84.011594      W: -84.011594
  • edi.1698.1  (Uploaded 2024-06-28)  
  • This information is released under the Creative Commons license - Attribution - CC BY (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The consumer of these data ("Data User" herein) is required to cite it appropriately in any publication that results from its use. The Data User should realize that these data may be actively used by others for ongoing research and that coordination may be necessary to prevent duplicate publication. The Data User is urged to contact the authors of these data if any questions about methodology or results occur. Where appropriate, the Data User is encouraged to consider collaboration or co-authorship with the authors. The Data User should realize that misinterpretation of data may occur if used out of context of the original study. While substantial efforts are made to ensure the accuracy of data and associated documentation, complete accuracy of data sets cannot be guaranteed. All data are made available "as is." The Data User should be aware, however, that data are updated periodically and it is the responsibility of the Data User to check for new versions of the data. The data authors and the repository where these data were obtained shall not be liable for damages resulting from any use or misinterpretation of the data. Thank you.
  • DOI PLACE HOLDER
  • Analyze this data package using:           

EDI is a collaboration between the University of New Mexico and the University of Wisconsin – Madison, Center for Limnology:

UNM logo UW-M logo