Ecologists recently have been focusing on the role that trait-mediated indirect
effects can have on community structure and composition. To date, this work has primarily
focused on the effects of predator-induced behavioral plasticity on communities. However,
predator-induced morphological plasticity, which has been documented in many taxa, might
also lead to trait-mediated indirect effects. Here, I examined how predators altered the
behavior and morphology of larval wood frogs (Rana sylvatica) and leopard frogs (R.
pipiens) and how these phenotypic changes altered the outcome of competition between
the two species.
Competition in the absence of caged predators was asymmetric; when reared separately,
leopard frogs grew more than wood frogs, but when competing (without predators), wood
frogs grew faster than leopard frogs. The presence of caged predators reversed the outcome
of competition between the two anuran prey. In the presence of larval dragonflies (Anax
spp.) or caged mudminnows (Umbra limi), leopard frogs grew faster than wood frogs while
total tadpole biomass production remained unchanged. Thus, there was a predator-mediated
indirect effect.
Because predators alter both the behavior and morphology of larval anurans and both
of these traits are known to affect resource consumption and growth, both are potential
mechanisms to explain the change in competitive outcome. Changes in behavior were not
related to changes in growth, but changes in morphology (specifically mouth width and
tail length) were related to changes in growth. When competitors were added (without
predators), wood frogs increased their mouth width by 10% and their tail length by 3%,
while leopard frogs increased their mouth width by 5% and did not change their tail length.
The greater increase in mouth width for wood frogs should increase their forage intake,
since tadpoles feed by scraping periphyton; the importance of a 3% longer tail in competitive
ability is unknown. The presence of the predator threat (via chemical cues from the caged
predators) reduced both the mouth width and tail length in the two prey species to precompetition
levels. This response corresponded with the reduced competitive ability of the
wood frogs. This work demonstrates that both competitors and predators can alter prey
morphology and suggests that changes in morphology can cause trait-mediated indirect
effects.